Started By
Message

re: 0-4 while Brees gets paid 100 million

Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:43 pm to
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Brees should have been a leader and demanded that the ball be ran when at the 1 yard line.
you're really reaching
Posted by Zipfer2022
Member since Nov 2011
3736 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

JS87


Kindly never post on this site ever again. Thanks in advance,
This post was edited on 9/30/12 at 8:54 pm
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
3480 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:56 pm to
So frustrating to see this type of logic try to be argued. It's a fricking team game, what more could Brees have done? With just a mediocre defense we win this game. It fricking Drew's fault that we literally cannot stop anyone?

Madness.....
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
10292 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

OH LOOK IT'S THAT THREAD


Sure is. Isn't there something we can put on a thread like this and make it go away?
Posted by HMTVBrian2
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
5760 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 8:59 pm to
Salary cap is taking a big jump soon, so no, it doesn't bother me.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

With just a mediocre defense we win this game. It fricking Drew's fault that we literally cannot stop anyone?


I thought the defense played its best game today. They made a big stop when it counted and they got an INT when it mattered. Our offense simply could not capitalize.
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 9:03 pm to
People do realize that Brees was filthy fricking rich before his new deal, right?

Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
3480 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 9:09 pm to
Well Breesus, you make a good point. I just can't place the blame on Drew for this, seems like 27 points would have us in a position to win.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48269 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Well then clearly we need to re-evaluate how good Mickey Loomis actually is. Because we keep spending 1st round picks on these players.



I agree with you 100 percent. Loomis built this roster, especially on Defense, and, this Defense Roster is WEAK.

But, Loomis will be here as long as he wants. Benson will never replace him, not matter what.

I have doubts about Mr. Loomis's abilities right now. In my view, he has not done a good job.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

I agree with you 100 percent. Loomis built this roster, especially on Defense, and, this Defense Roster is WEAK.


But our offensive roster is off the charts. Its hard to spend time and money on both. We are an offensive team and we give them the best stuff. To be far, we have tried to put talent on the defense. Some has not panned out. That happens. Hopefuly we get a big play maker in the offseason, either a blitzing OLB, or Pass Rushing DE and the whole team might change.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56365 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 10:05 pm to
The 100M doesn't bother me at all.

Why does it bother you. Would you feel better if he only got 90M?
Posted by HMTVBrian2
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
5760 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 10:14 pm to
Loomis is not a talent scout. The Saints draft who the coaches want to draft.

Loomis is a great, great GM in terms of contractual stuff. He crams as much into the salary cap as is possible.

The defensive roster you see today is more a product of Gregg Williams' eye for talent and MIckey Loomis accommodating him.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36667 posts
Posted on 9/30/12 at 10:16 pm to
I hope you stub your big toe as you walk in to your wife cheating on you with Greg Williams
Posted by smyce
Lafayette, La.
Member since Sep 2007
3167 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 2:52 am to
quote:

People do realize that Brees was filthy fricking rich before his new deal, right?


This is easily post of the season. When you made this post, there is zero chance you considered the flawed logic in this argument.
Posted by Ba Ba Boooey
Northshore
Member since May 2010
4705 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 2:55 am to
What a tool. Dude had at least 5 dropped passes including one from Sproles on the last drive that would have put the game away. If you want to hate on someone do it on Hartley. Guy hasn't done dick since '09
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8623 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 6:25 am to
quote:

Why do we have to wait? Ban this fricker.
Posted by HeadChange
Abort gay babies
Member since May 2009
43833 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 6:34 am to
quote:


He threw for 400 fricking yards and 3 touchdowns. Yeah this one is on him



Without a running game as well
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 6:43 am to
quote:

JS87

Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 6:53 am to
quote:

0-4 while Brees gets paid 100 million
Brees was fricking money today. And he did all that while being one dimensional on offense.
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14886 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 8:48 am to
It has become quite apparent here that most of you have relegated to screaming about Drew Brees video game like stats if anyone questions the fact that he is making 100 mil but cant win a game.

"Drew sure isn't earning all that money." "BUT BUT BUT LOOK AT HIS STATS!!!!!"
This post was edited on 10/1/12 at 8:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram