- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you trade 8 for 13 and 15?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
If we can dump Graham and temple, yes. Absolutely.
0
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Always have to have a long-term plan and be looking at the big picture.
well of course, but he's not hurting the long term plan either right now. He can be dumped at any point if you wanted to. You don't just do it to do it.
quote:
If it's between Mark Williams and Temple, I care. A lot.
Hate to break it to you, but you aren't drafting an all star there, and you're unlikely to even get a starter even if they do pan out well. But i do understand that it makes more sense to take that chance on pick 15 than to keep Temple, but my point is there's other ways to create that roster spot if that's what the goal is.
Hell Sacramento is said to want to move away from Barnes and get younger. You know Jax/DG make the same exact amount that Barnes does. Barnes would be a great vet to bring in for Trey to learn with, on top of the fact that he would help us win now.
I get why people want to do it, but i'm 100% against trading 8 to move to 13 & 15 regardless of the roster spot situation. That's just my opinion. If we are going to trade back, then i want a player back that i already know what he can bring to the table.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:10 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
but you aren't drafting an all star there, and you're unlikely to even get a starter even if they do pan out well.
You don’t need an all star, da frick is this shite
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:14 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Hate to break it to you, but you aren't drafting an all star there
I didn't say we were. We're not drafting one at 8, either, almost assuredly.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:23 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Hate to break it to you, but you aren't drafting an all star there, and you're unlikely to even get a starter even if they do pan out well.
Nope Not on herb
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You don’t need an all star, da frick is this shite
First of all, who said anything about needing an allstar?
Secondly, everyone needs more all-stars.
Finally, you completely missed the point. I'm simply saying to stop coveting a pick at 15 like it's going to be anything more than a role player at best. Not that we don't need more role players, but expecting to draft one isn't good odds.
I'm more on the either move up and try to draft an all star level player like Ivey, or move down and get back a veteran role player like Huerter.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 2:59 pm to TeddyPadillac
Teams with multiple picks are expected to try to move up in the draft, @Sam_Vecenie
and @johnhollinger
write.
Teams to watch include:
? OKC (Nos. 2, 12 and 30)
? SAS (Nos. 9, 20, and 25)
? CHA (Nos. 13 and 15)
? MEM (Nos. 22 and 29)
plenty of buzz about teams wanting to move up.
and @johnhollinger
write.
Teams to watch include:
? OKC (Nos. 2, 12 and 30)
? SAS (Nos. 9, 20, and 25)
? CHA (Nos. 13 and 15)
? MEM (Nos. 22 and 29)
plenty of buzz about teams wanting to move up.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:19 pm to cgrand
quote:Not really in a big hurry to move down.
Teams with multiple picks are expected to try to move up in the draft, @Sam_Vecenie
and @johnhollinger
write.
Teams to watch include:
? OKC (Nos. 2, 12 and 30)
? SAS (Nos. 9, 20, and 25)
? CHA (Nos. 13 and 15)
? MEM (Nos. 22 and 29)
plenty of buzz about teams wanting to move up.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 8:13 pm to Fun Bunch
I'm with you 100% if the Pels could pull Williams and Dieng.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 9:27 pm to gerard07
Idk I'd rather Malaki and Williams if possible
Posted on 5/26/22 at 10:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Da fuq is this?
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:12 am to NOSHAU
I’d give OKC 8 for 12 this year and their next year unprotected 1st
Posted on 5/27/22 at 10:03 am to Louisianabound88
quote:
I’d give OKC 8 for 12 this year and their next year unprotected 1st
They may not take that for Zion
Posted on 5/27/22 at 10:27 am to Louisianabound88
quote:
I’d give OKC 8 for 12 this year and their next year unprotected 1st
Lmao I'm sure we'd jump at that deal, but OKC has to agree to it as well.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 10:46 am to Louisianabound88
quote:this isn’t 2K man
I’d give OKC 8 for 12 this year and their next year unprotected 1st
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News