- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Source
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:38 am to Jon1798
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:38 am to Jon1798
Brogdon long term offers us the same thing Moore does, he is best suited at the 1-2 as a big guard.. We would likely be forced to play him out of position at the 3 just like we are doing with Moore, so we would still be overloaded at guard and done nothing to fix our problem at the wing, and you gave away 2 of our best trade assets
1
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:53 am to NOSHAU
The Bucks aren’t trading Brogdon AND Bledsoe, though I know others discussed above. And they certainly aren’t taking on Hill to do it.
And highly highly unlikely the Wizards trade Beal for anything much less that. Not their style.
And highly highly unlikely the Wizards trade Beal for anything much less that. Not their style.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 11:02 am to Soggymoss
Are you considering Johnson as one of our best trade assets? I mean, I know what you are saying, but funny to hear.
I think Brogdon and Moore are fairly similar yes. But I see Brogdon as younger, better, and ultimately cheaper I believe. He gives you another ball handler(which we need), and a great shooter(which we need).
And full disclosure, I think Randle is atrocious defensively. I don’t think we lose much with bigs of Davis, Mirotic, Okafor and Lopez.
In short, I think we are better this year and for years to come considering Randle is set to leave for nothing. I would love to trade Randle for a long term SF starter, I just don’t think that is out there. Depending on how you feel about Harrison Barnes maybe.
I think Brogdon and Moore are fairly similar yes. But I see Brogdon as younger, better, and ultimately cheaper I believe. He gives you another ball handler(which we need), and a great shooter(which we need).
And full disclosure, I think Randle is atrocious defensively. I don’t think we lose much with bigs of Davis, Mirotic, Okafor and Lopez.
In short, I think we are better this year and for years to come considering Randle is set to leave for nothing. I would love to trade Randle for a long term SF starter, I just don’t think that is out there. Depending on how you feel about Harrison Barnes maybe.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 11:05 am to Jon1798
quote:
The Bucks aren’t trading Brogdon AND Bledsoe
I think Randle/Moore for Bledsoe/Brogdon is a pretty even trade. For the expirings Randle > Bledsoe and the Bucks are the ones with the interest. For the players locked up longer term Brogdon > Moore but not by that much considering Brogdon will be getting a nice raise next season.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 11:09 am to TigerinATL
It’s not crazy, don’t get me wrong. But that is the entire starting backcourt for the #1 seed in the east. One of them for Randle (if any of this is even true), I could possibly understand. But that’s insanity if they trade two starters from a team doing so well. Just my opinion on this one of course.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 11:29 am to Jon1798
The only.reason Johnson is one of our best trade assets (not like we have a myriad of them) is because he is a 6 million dollar expiring that can be used as a salary filler for a bigger deal...
The Bucks could even turn around and flip him for another player if they wanted
The Bucks could even turn around and flip him for another player if they wanted
Posted on 1/4/19 at 12:09 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
Yep, Memphis got Holiday for 2 2nd rounders, yet Dell sits there and does nothing...
just to clarify, the trade was:
TO CHI: marshon brooks, wayne selden, MEM 2019 2nd rnd pick and MEM 2020 2nd round pick
TO MEM: justin holiday
thats pretty fricking good deal for CHI...
quote:
We couldve sent Clark and Diallo with a 2nd for him, or any of the other guys we dont play
they got well more than that for holiday from MEM. selden can play (as we know) and those two picks are good ammo
Posted on 1/4/19 at 1:18 pm to Jon1798
quote:You are probably right. If you substitute Maker for Brogdon, they may do it. Would the Pels?
The Bucks aren’t trading Brogdon AND Bledsoe, though I know others discussed above. And they certainly aren’t taking on Hill to do it.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 4:44 pm to PeliPelifactory
quote:If this were ever on the table, you have to think the Pels would jump all over this at this point.
Offer: Brogdon Maker 2nd for Randle
Posted on 1/28/19 at 4:47 pm to NOSHAU
It never really made sense though. I can see them wanting Randle hoping that the rental was enough to sell him since they aren't a FA destination, but Brogdon seems like too much to give up for what's possibly a rental.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 4:49 pm to TigerinATL
quote:Unless they do not think they can re-sign him. Doubtful it was ever really an option, but if so, makes all the sense to jump all over this.
It never really made sense though. I can see them wanting Randle hoping that the rental was enough to sell him since they aren't a FA destination, but Brogdon seems like too much to give up for what's possibly a rental.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 5:17 pm to pawel
quote:
There is controversy about his age since the 2016 draft. He MIGHT be 2-4 years older. 'Might' does not mean 'is'. But...might.
I remember when baseball had (maybe still has, don't follow MLB anymore) issues with this with Venezuelan and Dominican players being several years older than their listed age.
What's the story here?
Page 9 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News