- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:55 pm to jamal
That means playing Beal at the three. It's not the worst outcome but I rather trade Ball. Ingram got superstar potential
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:56 pm to Pelefraan 1
Agreed my man 
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:57 pm to Pelefraan 1
A base trade for Beal would be Moore, Solo and #4. You would then have to add in a future first or Ingram.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:58 pm to WhoGeaux
I do not want to give up any of the future draft capital we just acquired for Beal.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:58 pm to Mystictiger
I can get down with that. We have a lot to work with so hopefully we don’t overextend. And a guaranteed signing to another contract.
This post was edited on 6/17/19 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:58 pm to Mystictiger
They can have the future 1st
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:58 pm to Pelefraan 1
I mean it's either trading ball or we are gonna go small with the 3 guard line up with Ingram at the 4 ( if ingram isnt in the deal) and zion at the 5
Posted on 6/17/19 at 1:59 pm to Fun Bunch
I would rather give up a future pick than Ingram. Ingram could be a superstar, particularly if he is paired up with guys like Jrue, Zion, and Beal.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:00 pm to roguepelican
Beal and Jrue is up there with the best back courts in the league
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:00 pm to Pelefraan 1
Do we want to pay Ingram his new big contract or do we rather take on Beal and his current contract?
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:01 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:
I would rather give up a future pick than Ingram.
Not sure I agree depending on which pick and protections.
Ingram has 1 year left on his deal.
A draft pick is a potential asset for future moves or cap controlled talent.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:01 pm to roguepelican
If this was the case, Ingram would come off the bench as the primary scorer to lead that 2nd unit offense.
Would look like Zo, Jrue, Beal, Zion and a big to rebound and rim protect.
Would look like Zo, Jrue, Beal, Zion and a big to rebound and rim protect.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:01 pm to Pelefraan 1
And I mean we have been saying we have to build through the draft and with trades. So Beal fits the criteria.
I just don’t wanna give up too much
I just don’t wanna give up too much
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:02 pm to Fun Bunch
Jrue
Beal
Ingram
Zion
(gives me)Wood
Beal
Ingram
Zion
(gives me)Wood
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:02 pm to Chad504boy
He only has 2 years left on his deal right? Not like he's locked in for 4 years.
Beal is a stud, but his contract is fair. Not really a positive or a negative
Beal is a stud, but his contract is fair. Not really a positive or a negative
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:05 pm to jamal
I can agree, biggest difference is Langford is just a little bit longer and taller and langford has developed quicker than Oladipo which could be a good or bad thing. But ultimately Both lacked a consistent outside shot and were known for tough defense and the ability to drive to the basket and looked at as a 2 or combo guard.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:05 pm to Mystictiger
quote:
A base trade for Beal would be Moore, Solo and #4. You would then have to add in a future first or Ingram.
I’d say the 2021 but I like the possibility of the “double draft” in 2022 too much. I’d like to keep Moore’s shooting on board but if it means getting Beal while dumping Solo and say the 2025 and some of those Bucks 2nd rounders let’s do it. Run Ball, Jrue, and Beal as a 3 guard and bring Ingram off the bench. Zion obviously starts at the four. I guess Oak starts at the 5? Who else could be targets in FA?
This post was edited on 6/17/19 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:05 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Ingram has 1 year left on his deal.
Valid point, but it’s still his second contract so it would be fairly affordable, considering his talent, if he reaches his ceiling.
I love having the flexibility and cheap talent, but it’s such a hit or miss proposition. If we can get Beal for the 4 and a pick next year, and our roster is
BALL
JRUE
BEAL/INGRAM
ZION
YOU/ME/SOMEONE WITH A PULSE
I can’t imagine that we would be a lottery team.
Posted on 6/17/19 at 2:08 pm to Loaner1231
I want a big that can rebound and rim protect. Someone we should be able to get on a decent contract is Willie Cauley Stein. Kings didn’t seem too high on bringing him back.
This post was edited on 6/17/19 at 2:09 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News