- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pels trade to 13
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:06 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We don’t have a draft position next year.
We absolutely will have a draft position next year and if we have the typical injury luck it will be a top 10, likely top 5 spot. Unfortunately we gave up the pick that goes with it.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wait...what?
I don’t think you are but you are entering troll status when you literally post prompts on why to “temper” being hopeful our picks will be a success.
Not only do you or I NOT know, neither does an article, AI, or paid analysts. Let it play out ffs
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:10 pm to Soggymoss
One of those trades that’s so bad it’s really indefensible. Anyone saying they like this trade knows little to nothing about the NBA, just a fact.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:14 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
Not only do you or I NOT know
You don't have to. We have data to give us %s on these decisions.
It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.
Your argument is barbershop bullshite.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.
Fair. You judge in real time… but %’s versus what ultimately plays out with results will be definitive. I hope you are incorrect in your assessment vs. results
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
All these arm chair gms..lmao there's a reason yall flipping burgers and not working for the nba..
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In poker, going all-in for 5x pot on the turn when you have a 2-outer can work if that 5% hits on the river, but does that make it a good decision in hindsight if you find yourself on the good side of that variance? Or was it always a bad decision with a small chance of working out (without the expected value to justify the risk)?
I agree that this is a bad trade, but this is a really poor way to explain why.
It’s more simple than that, and almost the opposite of the way you framed it. They acquired a relative known in exchange for a statistically more valuable unknown (next year’s pick / the river). They sacrificed reward to hedge risk.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to RIPMachoMan
There’s just absolutely no reason to give an unprotected pick up for a guy like Queen.
It could play out in our favor but it’s still bad process
It could play out in our favor but it’s still bad process
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.
But we KNOW what they got right now. We don’t truly know what they gave up outside of the statistical probability that it ends up being more valuable than what they got.
You should study up on statistics, risk, and probabilities before acting like you understand them.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OK so we have a huge data set to get some real good projections by tier and y'all would rather reference outliers.
Hey SFP, remember the low chances the mentioned of us getting a top 4 pick?
No low chances is a good thing with a player not busting or being meaningful.
I love when people argue themselves basically.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:33 pm to BilJ
quote:
There’s just absolutely no reason to give an unprotected pick up for a guy like Queen. It could play out in our favor but it’s still bad process
It’s a bad trade.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:36 pm to TigahJay
quote:
One of those trades that’s so bad it’s really indefensible. Anyone saying they like this trade knows little to nothing about the NBA, just a fact.
Yep, it has nothing to do with Queen at all. If you like this trade then your opinion about the NBA is invalid because I know you’re a dumbass. It’s about value and the value on this trade is awful, even if Queen becomes the next Jokic
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:39 pm to Balsamic_duck
I want to make it clear, I like Queen, I think 13 is a great spot to get him. Trading next years pick unprotected ALONG with 23 just to move up 10 spots to get him is fricking awful
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:46 pm to BilJ
Apologies for changing the subject and talking about the guy that we drafted, but I'm going to do it anyway.
I don't follow college basketball, so I didn't know shite about Queen until earlier tonight. But watching some highlights, he's going to be a lot of fun to watch. Whenever he gets a defensive rebound, he reminds me a lot of a (much) less athletic Blake Griffin. Both are elite fast-break facilitators that can give your team a sneaky basket per game with a great half/full court pass. If the post-rebound pass isn''t available, both are willing to play point forward with a fast pace. They have nearly identical measurements. But watching Queen's highlights, the athleticism difference between the two is apparent. It's kind of shocking how effective Queen is attacking the basket given how lumbering he is. He gets praise for top tier footwork and decision making, and that looks to be what makes him so effective. Hopefully that translates to the pros. With the lack of athleticism, he definitely needs to work on a jumpshot to keep defenders honest.
I don't follow college basketball, so I didn't know shite about Queen until earlier tonight. But watching some highlights, he's going to be a lot of fun to watch. Whenever he gets a defensive rebound, he reminds me a lot of a (much) less athletic Blake Griffin. Both are elite fast-break facilitators that can give your team a sneaky basket per game with a great half/full court pass. If the post-rebound pass isn''t available, both are willing to play point forward with a fast pace. They have nearly identical measurements. But watching Queen's highlights, the athleticism difference between the two is apparent. It's kind of shocking how effective Queen is attacking the basket given how lumbering he is. He gets praise for top tier footwork and decision making, and that looks to be what makes him so effective. Hopefully that translates to the pros. With the lack of athleticism, he definitely needs to work on a jumpshot to keep defenders honest.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:58 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
It’s about value and the value on this trade is awful, even if Queen becomes the next Jokic
so you telling me, if Queen becomes a great player, and the player that Atlanta gets next year doesn't pan out, you'd still hate this trade b/c of YOUR perceived value of the pick we just traded?
seems like so many of y'all are more worried about the perception of looking like we are so saavy and trying to outsmart everyone and trying to be like OKC with stockpiling picks/assets, that when we actually utilize some of the assets we have acquired, you are automatically pissed/unhappy with whatever it is we've just done b/c we've spent some of the capital we've acquired...
at some point, we can't just hold on to all the picks and not actually pick people, or use those picks to trade up to grab someone we feel is worth it, regardless of what the hypothetical, perceived value of the commodity we are giving up is....
we got better tonight... and y'all worried about this next year's draft pick we traded away in order to do that, when realistically, no one knows how good these guys we just got may end up being....
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:08 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:
All these arm chair gms..lmao there's a reason yall flipping burgers and not working for the nba..
This organization would have been better off if Dumars was flipping burgers and Griff was selling cars….
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:10 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
He's like Sengun.
Seems like a fair comp for Queen.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:10 pm to chRxis
quote:
when we actually utilize some of the assets we have acquired
We did this last year. Ended up costing us the 21 year old runner up DPOY and three first round picks for Murray and the ability to move up ten spots in the draft…...
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:16 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
We did this last year. Ended up costing us the 21 year old runner up DPOY and three first round picks for Murray and the ability to move up ten spots in the draft…...
ok, but now you are conflating Griffin's decisions with Dumars'.... pick a lane... they are two different GMs with different philosophies and approaches....
you can't saddle Dumars with Griff's decisions, to try to tip the scales in favor of your opinion of the current state of the team....
Popular
Back to top


0







