Started By
Message

re: Pels trade to 13

Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
8348 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

We don’t have a draft position next year.


We absolutely will have a draft position next year and if we have the typical injury luck it will be a top 10, likely top 5 spot. Unfortunately we gave up the pick that goes with it.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
8579 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Wait...what?


I don’t think you are but you are entering troll status when you literally post prompts on why to “temper” being hopeful our picks will be a success.

Not only do you or I NOT know, neither does an article, AI, or paid analysts. Let it play out ffs
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 10:11 pm
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
11028 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:10 pm to
One of those trades that’s so bad it’s really indefensible. Anyone saying they like this trade knows little to nothing about the NBA, just a fact.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466158 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Not only do you or I NOT know

You don't have to. We have data to give us %s on these decisions.

It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.

Your argument is barbershop bullshite.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
8579 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.


Fair. You judge in real time… but %’s versus what ultimately plays out with results will be definitive. I hope you are incorrect in your assessment vs. results
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
38153 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to
All these arm chair gms..lmao there's a reason yall flipping burgers and not working for the nba..
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1611 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

In poker, going all-in for 5x pot on the turn when you have a 2-outer can work if that 5% hits on the river, but does that make it a good decision in hindsight if you find yourself on the good side of that variance? Or was it always a bad decision with a small chance of working out (without the expected value to justify the risk)?


I agree that this is a bad trade, but this is a really poor way to explain why.

It’s more simple than that, and almost the opposite of the way you framed it. They acquired a relative known in exchange for a statistically more valuable unknown (next year’s pick / the river). They sacrificed reward to hedge risk.


Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162088 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:25 pm to
There’s just absolutely no reason to give an unprotected pick up for a guy like Queen.

It could play out in our favor but it’s still bad process
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1611 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

It's not about KNOWING. It's about making the best decision for the highest EV and that is judged in real time.


But we KNOW what they got right now. We don’t truly know what they gave up outside of the statistical probability that it ends up being more valuable than what they got.

You should study up on statistics, risk, and probabilities before acting like you understand them.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13269 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

OK so we have a huge data set to get some real good projections by tier and y'all would rather reference outliers.


Hey SFP, remember the low chances the mentioned of us getting a top 4 pick?

No low chances is a good thing with a player not busting or being meaningful.

I love when people argue themselves basically.
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1611 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

There’s just absolutely no reason to give an unprotected pick up for a guy like Queen. It could play out in our favor but it’s still bad process


It’s a bad trade.
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
4332 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

One of those trades that’s so bad it’s really indefensible. Anyone saying they like this trade knows little to nothing about the NBA, just a fact.


Yep, it has nothing to do with Queen at all. If you like this trade then your opinion about the NBA is invalid because I know you’re a dumbass. It’s about value and the value on this trade is awful, even if Queen becomes the next Jokic
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
4332 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:39 pm to
I want to make it clear, I like Queen, I think 13 is a great spot to get him. Trading next years pick unprotected ALONG with 23 just to move up 10 spots to get him is fricking awful
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
50200 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:46 pm to
Apologies for changing the subject and talking about the guy that we drafted, but I'm going to do it anyway.

I don't follow college basketball, so I didn't know shite about Queen until earlier tonight. But watching some highlights, he's going to be a lot of fun to watch. Whenever he gets a defensive rebound, he reminds me a lot of a (much) less athletic Blake Griffin. Both are elite fast-break facilitators that can give your team a sneaky basket per game with a great half/full court pass. If the post-rebound pass isn''t available, both are willing to play point forward with a fast pace. They have nearly identical measurements. But watching Queen's highlights, the athleticism difference between the two is apparent. It's kind of shocking how effective Queen is attacking the basket given how lumbering he is. He gets praise for top tier footwork and decision making, and that looks to be what makes him so effective. Hopefully that translates to the pros. With the lack of athleticism, he definitely needs to work on a jumpshot to keep defenders honest.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
12879 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:49 pm to
He's like Sengun.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

It’s about value and the value on this trade is awful, even if Queen becomes the next Jokic

so you telling me, if Queen becomes a great player, and the player that Atlanta gets next year doesn't pan out, you'd still hate this trade b/c of YOUR perceived value of the pick we just traded?

seems like so many of y'all are more worried about the perception of looking like we are so saavy and trying to outsmart everyone and trying to be like OKC with stockpiling picks/assets, that when we actually utilize some of the assets we have acquired, you are automatically pissed/unhappy with whatever it is we've just done b/c we've spent some of the capital we've acquired...

at some point, we can't just hold on to all the picks and not actually pick people, or use those picks to trade up to grab someone we feel is worth it, regardless of what the hypothetical, perceived value of the commodity we are giving up is....

we got better tonight... and y'all worried about this next year's draft pick we traded away in order to do that, when realistically, no one knows how good these guys we just got may end up being....
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13813 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

All these arm chair gms..lmao there's a reason yall flipping burgers and not working for the nba..


This organization would have been better off if Dumars was flipping burgers and Griff was selling cars….
This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 11:09 pm
Posted by Mad Scientist26
Member since Jul 2018
2268 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

He's like Sengun.


Seems like a fair comp for Queen.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13813 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

when we actually utilize some of the assets we have acquired


We did this last year. Ended up costing us the 21 year old runner up DPOY and three first round picks for Murray and the ability to move up ten spots in the draft…...

This post was edited on 6/25/25 at 11:12 pm
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

We did this last year. Ended up costing us the 21 year old runner up DPOY and three first round picks for Murray and the ability to move up ten spots in the draft…...


ok, but now you are conflating Griffin's decisions with Dumars'.... pick a lane... they are two different GMs with different philosophies and approaches....

you can't saddle Dumars with Griff's decisions, to try to tip the scales in favor of your opinion of the current state of the team....

first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram