Started By
Message

re: Pels get the #1 pick, who would you want to draft?

Posted on 5/16/22 at 3:42 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172209 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 3:42 pm to
If we're getting pick 3 or 4, am i the only one wanting Shaedon Sharpe?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285044 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Hell, McNamara compared him to Jayson Tatum the other day. He's far closer to the other Duke wings I mentioned then the guys you mentioned.


We are talking about Pablo Banchero right

McNamara is one of the worst evaluators of talent I’ve ever seen fwiw
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35247 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Not if they got #1. Based on the current cap and tax estimates, the #1 pick would put us about $3 over the tax.

You're right, the numbers I was looking at didn't factor in the 120% of the rookie scale.

I'm sure they'd figure something out to squeak below it before the end of the season.

ETA: if we land any top 3 pick we would be in the tax. The 4th pick would be very close, would depend on the exact cap figure.
This post was edited on 5/16/22 at 3:57 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73353 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 4:04 pm to

quote:

you mean 40lbs heavier than Chet is now?


We don’t know what Chet weighs now. I’d assume he’s eclipsed 200 lb by now at least.

Either way his weight isn’t crucial to his game like Gobert
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76624 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:17 pm to
I just don't understand how people watch Jabari Smith and don't realize right away that his game meshes perfectly in the NBA.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13081 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

You're right, the numbers I was looking at didn't factor in the 120% of the rookie scale.

I'm sure they'd figure something out to squeak below it before the end of the season.

ETA: if we land any top 3 pick we would be in the tax. The 4th pick would be very close, would depend on the exact cap figure.

Agree, it would not take much to get below tax by end of the season.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73353 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Chet Holmgren’s final shooting numbers:
170-280 overall (60.7%)
129-175 on twos (73.7%)
105-125 at the rim (84%)
24-50 non rim twos (48%)
41-105 from three (39%)
71-99 free throws (71.7%)

He ended w/ a 69.1% TS% and a 68.0% eFG% on 21.6% usage w/ an offensive rating of 127.0

Time to look at their final advanced stats, starting with Chet Holmgren:
67.3% MIN%, 19.6 REB% (28.7% DR%, 8.0% OR%), 11.4 AST%, 15.7 TO%, 1.00 A/TO ratio, 1.6% STL%, 12.6 BLK%, 78.7 defensive rating, 31.3 PER, 15.0 BPM (7.5 OBPM, 7.5 DBPM), .294 win shares/40 minutes





quote:

Paolo Banchero’s final shooting numbers:
245-513 overall (47.8%)
201-383 on twos (52.5%)
127-188 at the rim (67.6%)
74-195 non rim twos (37.9%)
44-130 from three (33.8%)
137-188 FTs (72.9%)

He ended w/ a 55.7% TS% and a 52.0% eFG% on 27.5% usage w/ an offensive rating of 113.8

Paolo Banchero’s final advanced stats for 2021-22:
82.2% MIN%, 13.2% REB% (19.1% DR%, 6.4% OR%), 17.5% AST%, 13.3% TO%, 1.35 A/TO ratio, 1.9% STL%, 2.7% BLK%, 98.1 defensive rating, 24.2 PER, 7.7 BPM (5.4 OBPM, 2.3 DBPM), .191 win shares/40 minutes




quote:

Jabari Smith’s final shooting numbers:
183-427 overall (42.9%)
104-239 on twos (43.5%)
41-63 at the rim (65.1%)
63-176 non rim twos (35.8%)
79-188 from three (42%)
131-164 free throws (79.9%)

He ended w/ a 57.0% TS% and a 52.1% eFG% on 27.6% usage w/ an offensive rating of 116.5

Jabari Smith’s final advanced stats for 2021-22:
70.9% MIN%, 13.6% REB% (23.5% DR%, 3.5% OR%), 14.0 AST%, 11.1% TO%, 1.08 A/TO ratio, 2.1% STL%, 3.8% BLK%, 90.7 defensive rating, 25.1 PER, 11.1 BPM (7.4 OBPM, 3.8 DBPM), .227 win shares/40 minutes


Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15511 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

We are talking about Pablo Banchero right

McNamara is one of the worst evaluators of talent I’ve ever seen fwiw


Yes Banchero, but the point was he's a wing, not an interior big.
This post was edited on 5/16/22 at 5:41 pm
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15511 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand how people watch Jabari Smith and don't realize right away that his game meshes perfectly in the NBA.


I think the very fact that he's a consensus top three pick in this draft says people do realize this. But so are Chet and Paolo, and people don't draft for today, but rather 5-6 years down the line.
Posted by Pelicans4Real
Member since Jun 2019
168 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:48 pm to
I want Sharpe or Chet
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285044 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Yes Banchero, but the point was he's a wing, not an interior big.


Is a stretch 4 a wing now? Im just asking, I don’t know how that’s categorized

He’s very different than Tatum though. Could you imagine him trying to guard Tatum? Ain’t happening
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285044 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 5:55 pm to
Put that in a spread sheet, sandy
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15511 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Is a stretch 4 a wing now? Im just asking, I don’t know how that’s categorized

He’s very different than Tatum though. Could you imagine him trying to guard Tatum? Ain’t happening


I think of him in the mold of a Giannis, Tobias Harris, etc. Guys you could really call a 3 or a 4, but are more wing oriented players. Duke coaches specifically named him as a wing as well, which I think is telling.

I think the defense is the big question mark with him. I think 1-on-1 defense is less of a concern and things you have to do off ball are where the big concerns come in. He was actually really good defending on the perimeter, iso situations, defending the ball in the PnR, etc. But when he had to defend the roll man in the PnR, or rotate, etc is where his tape is pretty bad.

It's well said in Kevin O'Connor's scouting report on him:

quote:

A strong and quick defender who could potentially develop into a versatile on-ball stopper. He can slide laterally against smaller guys and might be best suited as a small-ball 5 due to his comfort switching screens.

very game, he has instances when he doesn't even bother to contest a shot or rotate to help. He’ll sometimes lose track of his man and he could be better about boxing out more frequently. Banchero shoulders a lot of responsibility on offense, so he might be conserving energy.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62442 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 6:08 pm to
I think there are 2 different conversations happening here. Will Chet be a good NBA player and will Chet be a good NBA center. I think there's a lot less certainty about him becoming a good center vs. a good player because of the weight issue.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76624 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

I think the very fact that he's a consensus top three pick in this draft says people do realize this. But so are Chet and Paolo, and people don't draft for today, but rather 5-6 years down the line.



My point is Jabari is a consensus #1 in my eyes.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15511 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

My point is Jabari is a consensus #1 in my eyes.


He probably has the highest floor, but I think it's hard for some to justify taking a role player #1. I was listening to an NBA draft pod the other day and they were talking about how Jabari isn't a guy that you can give the ball and tell him to go get a basket. You'd be taking a guy that isn't a #1 with the first overall pick. This is all hypothetical of course, maybe he will become that.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285044 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

I think there's a lot less certainty about him becoming a good center vs. a good player


I just don’t think his position categorization is relevant at all
This post was edited on 5/16/22 at 6:50 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285044 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Giannis, Tobias Harris, etc. Guys you could really call a 3 or a 4, but are more wing oriented players.


I mean I could get on board with Harris but neither one of those guys have the ball mobility of Giannis to get to whatever spot he wants to on the court.


Im probably selling him short, and maybe it’s my bias but I see a KAT/ Al Horford mix.

Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76624 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

You'd be taking a guy that isn't a #1 with the first overall pick.


Chet wasn't a #1 at Gonzaga
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62442 posts
Posted on 5/16/22 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

I just don’t think his position categorization is relevant at all


For the people that think he's a "perfect fit" with Zion, who is guarding centers? Over the next few years you can stagger and use bench minutes to make it not matter, but starting in year 3 it probably becomes an issue to resolve if he can't be your main rim protector.

I'm not saying don't draft him, but there really isn't a consensus #1, so if you get the #1 pick, what you think that player will likely be in 3-5 years might be the tie breaker when picking. Honestly, if he's not a center he probably has a lot more trade value in 3-5 years if you need to trade him because he's too redundant.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram