Started By
Message

re: Our Best 3 Players Do Not Fit Together

Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
8712 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

If it doesn’t bother BI (which we’ll see) and it helps us win more games, I’m all for it. Does that help explain where I’m coming from?


It does and I get that. I still think its a bit concerning that the thing he does best- scoring- is whats being minimized for him to fit in. Which brings me back to whether hes the right fit but I do get where you’re coming from.
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
6767 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Which brings me back to whether hes the right fit but I do get where you’re coming from.


I have great concerns that BI and Zion will fit. And for someone who greatly appreciates that BI actually wanted to be here and is loved by his teammates, I can acknowledge the best thing for this team may be to trade him. I’m just saying we have seen very little of Zion and BI together, much less an in shape Zion and BI together. And I feel like progress was being made the last few weeks as to them playing better together. But maybe I’m seeing what I want to see. If you can’t lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
8712 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

I have great concerns that BI and Zion will fit. And for someone who greatly appreciates that BI actually wanted to be here and is loved by his teammates, I can acknowledge the best thing for this team may be to trade him. I’m just saying we have seen very little of Zion and BI together, much less an in shape Zion and BI together. And I feel like progress was being made the last few weeks as to them playing better together. But maybe I’m seeing what I want to see. If you can’t lie to yourself, who can you lie to?


Well I think the play-in/playoffs will tell us a lot. Because the BI extension will be a huge turning point (good or bad) for this Griffin tenure. I have serious doubts but we shall see what they can do.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1133 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:39 am to
It ultimately doesn’t matter.. but the Pels at 49 wins would have been the 3 seed last season. The Western conference being historically brutal this season has altered our perspectives on topics
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
3102 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Its painfully obvious that they do not fit together, but they are all good players.

Its sort of a good problem to have in a way.


This is it. Zion, BI and CJ are all good players. They just dont fit together. You cant get rid of Zion cuz he's your best player, and you cant get rid of CJ because he takes the majority of your 3. That leaves BI as the odd man out
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61461 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This is it. Zion, BI and CJ are all good players. They just dont fit together. You cant get rid of Zion cuz he's your best player, and you cant get rid of CJ because he takes the majority of your 3. That leaves BI as the odd man out


The problem with that logic is a BI trade will likely be seen by the players as a downgrade for money reasons unless you bring back a similar talent in the trade. There’s no quicker way to lose a team than openly telling them you aren’t serious about winning. A money move with Tyson Chandler was pointed to after the fact by David West as the move that killed the CP3 era.

On top of that, you in theory drafted a replacement for CJs shooting in Hawkins. Shift Trey to starter and give Hawk 6th man minutes and how much do you miss CJ’s shooting?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25466 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:17 am to
That's why i've been adament about the type of player you get in return if you're going to trade BI. It needs to be someone that's at a minimum an equal value guy at a different position, PG or Center. The look has to be that Trey takes BI's spot, and the new player takes JV's spot, whether at the 5 or at the 1.
The move needs to be for someone like Bam, or KAT, or Markannen.
Really hoping the Wolves get beat by the Suns and they realize Edwards needs guard help and playing with KAT/Gobert isnt' really working. A simple swap of BI for KAT really does improve both teams.


And you can easily point to the reason it appears BI and Zion don't work, b/c the way we utilized both of them early in the season offensively is basically for one on one situations. This team always plays better when they are moving the ball. When BI and Zion were both averaging 6 assists a game is when we were at our best. Didn't matter if they were scoring 25 or 15, when they both had 6+ assists we typically won the game.
They were playing great together in February and March. They each averaged 6 assists per game. BI was only scoring 20ppg, and Zion 24ppg. We went 15-6 during that stretch before BI got hurt.


Zion set 24 picks all year this year where he rolled to the basket

24.

He played in 69 games and set 24 picks. Let that sink it.

Giannis is someone who dominates the ball, and even he set 140 picks this year as the roll man.
Lebron set 123 picks this year as the roll man.


24 is a pathetic number, and that's a coaching blunder.

Trey has only set 35 picks and rolled, and he's literally one of the most effecient pick setters in the league wiht a 1.49 PPP when he sets a pick and rolls to the goal. And i'm sure if i could see a stat where it shows setting a pick and popping out for a shot, he'd have an even higher PPP.


What i find very odd is that there's been 1,243 possessions this year where we set a pick on the ball handler, but we only roll to the goal on 338 of them, basically a quarter of the time.

The Celtics have 1290 possessions with ball screens, and 482 of them resulted in someone rolling to the goal, and they shoot more 3's than anyone.

So we aren't going to roll to the goal when we set picks, but the guys we are leaving out after the pick aren't real threats to shoot a 3 in JV and Nance. What was the point of the pick? Why do you think BI and Zion are always facing a wall of defenders?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115598 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:20 am to
quote:

That's why i've been adament about the type of player you get in return if you're going to trade BI. It needs to be someone that's at a minimum an equal value guy at a different position, PG or Center.


I do agree here. It would be hard to do, but you have to do a star for star type of deal.

You can't trade for a bunch of spare parts and sell it as a fit/depth move.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110742 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

The problem with that logic is a BI trade will likely be seen by the players as a downgrade for money reasons unless you bring back a similar talent in the trade.
Winning cures all. The idea of any trade, but obviously a massive trade, is to get better. If you get better, problem solved.

Now if it's a miscalculation and it makes us worse, well then I'm not sure how much it matters if you've lost the locker room or if they're totally bought in, either way you're screwed.

So I don't see that as a reason not to do a trade.
quote:

On top of that, you in theory drafted a replacement for CJs shooting in Hawkins. Shift Trey to starter and give Hawk 6th man minutes and how much do you miss CJ’s shooting?

CJ does a shite ton more than just shooting, a lot of things that Hawkins has not shown he can do and some things that we know he will never do. It's a lot more than just shooting going from CJ to Hawkins.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61461 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 10:03 am to
quote:

So I don't see that as a reason not to do a trade.


I'm not saying don't trade BI, but you can't trade a quarter for dimes. They have to find a better deal than that if they move him.

quote:

CJ does a shite ton more than just shooting, a lot of things that Hawkins has not shown he can do and some things that we know he will never do. It's a lot more than just shooting going from CJ to Hawkins.


He does, and if there weren't a salary cap/tax you probably don't think about trading him. However, I'm not suggesting year 2 Hawk = 80% of CJ. I'm suggesting Trey to the starting lineup and Hawk getting a big enough role off the bench allows you to money ball most of CJ's production.
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 10:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram