Started By
Message

re: Offseason player trade rumors thread

Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:25 pm to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29791 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

I really don’t understand what the Thunder are doing if they trade Shai.



maybe they don't want to pay him that much b/c they don't think he's worth it, like Sexton, but know that's what he wants, and that someone else will give him a max.


quote:

I think the picks you outlined are probably fair, but why the hell would OKC want more draft picks? They already have like 25 in the next 8 years.



that i don't understand. I"m not sure what they are trying to do.
Posted by LesGeaux45
Member since Nov 2009
9255 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

They shouldn't be. Locking into SGA as your top dog is doomed to fail like Butler in Chicago and George in Indy.


Yep. I think it's a much different story if they get a top 3 pick. Falling all the way to sixth AND not getting the Houston pick is a pretty terrible outcome for them. If they sign SGA to the max, they'll have him, Poku, Dort, Scottie Barnes maybe, Kemba, and a bunch of other stuff. They're still years away from sniffing contention at this point. I think that's why they at least think about seeing what they can get for SGA.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:40 pm to
Stop it guys.

Just stop.

You aren’t getting SGA for our poo poo platter of draft picks.

OKC has no incentive to do it. None, zilch. Stop it
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29791 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

How good his defense is, leadership, handle, crunch time creation are all things I'd want to know more about before trading half the warchest for him



That's where i stand on him, and why i would'nt say i'm ready to unload a ton of assets for him. I don't know enough about him.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

our poo poo platter of draft picks.



Everybody acts like the Pels have a bunch of picks in the late 20's, that's not what they have at all. It's 2 bundles of picks. After what we saw in the playoffs, do you think the Lakers will have no down years between now and 2025?

I think betting on injury, decline, or both if you had picks all 4 years is a decent bet to make. If you only had 1 or 2 of them it's not as attractive because you don't know when tragedy will strike.

To get value you have to trade an entire bundle, like all of the Lakers picks/swaps together. I also think the noise from Zion's family makes our own pick/swap in 2 years worth betting on for other teams.

This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 3:50 pm
Posted by PelsForLife
Member since May 2019
474 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 3:49 pm to
You guys are crazy if you wouldn't trade the warchest for SGA. Dude is posting crazy numbers and doesn't turn the ball over. He's same age as NAW, younger than Tatum. Has 50% fg and 42% 3pt this season. Better PER than Tatum this season as well.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13488 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

You guys are crazy if you wouldn't trade the warchest for SGA. Dude is posting crazy numbers and doesn't turn the ball over. He's same age as NAW, younger than Tatum. Has 50% fg and 42% 3pt this season. Better PER than Tatum this season as well.


I agree with a lot of what you say, except that he does turn the ball over. He averages 3 turnovers a game. Also, would need to know how his foot injury has healed.
This post was edited on 6/25/21 at 4:18 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20704 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Cannot see it. Since when does a soon to be 23 year old not "fit their timeline?"


If he's tired of losing and has asked for a trade, and they are at risk of creating a bad locker room with a young team by having their best player as a malcontent.

That's all just speculation, but I don't know why it's improbable.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:45 pm to
It’s pretty much irrelevant, You aren’t getting SGA for the tenth pick and a bunch of Lakers and Bucks picks

You aren’t getting him period

OKC is not in a seller mode. They aren’t going to make a bunch of what-if decisions years out
that they don’t need to.

SGA will be starting for OKC opening day.

Brogdon will be starting in IND opening day.

The reason we want these players is because they are good players on good deals, that fit our culture. Stop and consider that the teams that acquired them also believe that.
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
10040 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

It’s pretty much irrelevant, You aren’t getting SGA for the tenth pick and a bunch of Lakers and Bucks picks

You aren’t getting him period



Yeah? Well now I want it to happen even more.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 2:37 pm to
Sounds like the Raptors wouldn't be looking to trade core pieces and start over either:

quote:

“This year was a bit of an aberration for us...We totally expect to be competitive next year.”

The Raptors jumped to 4th in the Draft Lottery! Their GM, Bobby Webster, tells Justin Termine & Eddie Johnson he expects a rebound next season.

LINK
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20704 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 2:42 pm to
I just really get the feeling that the play-in has forever changed the dynamics of the NBA trade market. With more teams believing that they can make the postseason, there will always be fewer willing to sell off key pieces in exchange for picks.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 2:59 pm to
That probably makes going all in for SGA even more the move to make this offseason. Disgruntled stars control where they go to a large degree. If the Pels don't become a middle of the pack playoff team, it won't matter what assets they have when a disgruntled star wants out.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26065 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:02 pm to
I’m down for pushing in the chips for SGA, but what does that look like? What does it take and where does that leave us for the next move? He isn’t the only move we need to make if we are moving on from pieces like BI/JAX/NAW to make it happen.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466275 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

SGA is available to sign a 5/$168M max extension this offseason, and now we hear he might be available for trade. Maybe OKC isn't interested in giving him that, just like Cleveland isn't interested in giving Sexton a max extension. once you sign that extension, you can't be traded for a year.
Do you think SGA is worth $34M/yr? Do you realize if you get him and sign him to that, then you'll have BI/SGA/Zion making $100M+/yr in 2 years. We'd have zero flexibility, so i ask again, is SGA going to make us a championship contender? Is that who you want to unload the war chest on?

he's as good as any potential 3rd option

and any legit 3rd option we acquire will have the same salary concerns with Zion/BI

so is your argument that we should give up on getting an elite guy to pair with Zion/BI?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466275 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

I’m down for pushing in the chips for SGA, but what does that look like?

i'm curious, too

if SGA isn't on their timeline then NAW/Hayes shouldn't be, either
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

if SGA isn't on their timeline then NAW/Hayes shouldn't be, either


Bledsoe + 10 + 3 future picks? For the future picks give them unprotected the best of Pels/Lakers picks for the next 3 years?

OKC ended up 6th in what is considered a 4-5 player draft. With 10 added to their 6, 16, 18 maybe they can move into the top 3 this year and between their own picks and the best of our next several picks they increase their odds of landing a foundation player.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

now we hear he might be available for trade.

Nowhere has that been reported

Media speculation does not equal insider confirmation.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466275 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:19 pm to
the only issue with that is that I"m sure SGA would likely be a better chip + 6 to move into the top 3

you can't tell me SGA wouldn't be perfect to deal to Toronto at 4, also. 4 and 6 would be a good start
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/27/21 at 3:22 pm to
The last thing we need is Griffin desperate for a player Presti has other bidders for.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 39
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 39Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram