Started By
Message

re: Lol Hayes is JaVale McGee 2.0

Posted on 6/22/19 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Am I off thinking Hayes might develop into a Rudy Gobert type?


Maybe his potential, but you'd be more accurate if he's capela
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78196 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

It also is not clear why getting off it is so important unless you really think there is a big move needed to be made this FA period that requires that cash?


Like say a starting stretch 5? Shooters?

For a guy who continues to talk about how we need shooters, why don’t you want us to have the mo eh to pay for them?
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Like say a starting stretch 5? Shooters?

For a guy who continues to talk about how we need shooters, why don’t you want us to have the mo eh to pay for them?




So who is this mythical stretch 5 that requires that extra cap space? Dedmon? Gasol? Lopez? Horford? Because your argument is hinging on that contract being a negative(it isn't) and it freeing up needed space ASAP because of FA moves that couldn't be made without it.

Most aren't getting more than 20 mil a year and if they do you don't want to be the team paying it.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 3:52 pm
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:27 pm to
An expiring isn't an asset until that deadline. That's the argument
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

An expiring isn't an asset until that deadline. That's the argument




Then following this logic, there is still no real need to take a lesser return to get off it unless you have some clear imminent use for it. Which is the accompanying argument being made.

And maybe Griffin does, but I go down the list of FA's and they are either going to require overpays, or you get to guys that probably fit under the 18 million we had and arent major needle movers.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78196 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

So who is this mythical stretch 5 that requires that extra cap space?



Then you named like 3. So not super mystical.

We could also add another shooter

Idk why you were fine with just Garland or Hunter but you seem really upset that we have the money to add 2 decent 3 point shooters to space the floor
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
6046 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 6:50 pm to
That one player isn't getting all $30m...we need multiple veterans and are now in a position to make an uneven trade such as Moore for Marvin Williams.

Griff has a plan for it...let's wait and see.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:27 pm to
So you would pay 30 million for one of those players? You still aren’t really articulating any point here. Why is that extra salary so critical?

Because with garland or Hunter you still have 18 million to spend on shooters. Then you have Hill’s expiring to use closer to the deadline to facilitate more assets.

I need a more convincing case as to why you sacrifice the ten pick for the 17th to get out of an asset that was poised to be positive near the deadline? Because Lowe reported that was the sticking point and we settled for that.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 8:30 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20669 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

I go down the list of FA's and they are either going to require overpays, or you get to guys that probably fit under the 18 million we had and arent major needle movers.


Here's the thing, though. If all the good free agents this year are getting more money, are they really getting overpaid? Or is this just natural and the way the NBA works?

We still need another pure PG and at least one big (preferably two). Let's say we just get Darren Collison and Niko Mirotic. That would likely eat up all the cap room that we have, and neither of them really excites me -- they just fill needs.

Griffin is not going to let that cap space go unused. Nor should he. We need it, and I bet we need the $5 million that trading Moore will get us too.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Here's the thing, though. If all the good free agents this year are getting more money, are they really getting overpaid? Or is this just natural and the way the NBA works?


I mean sure, from an economic perspective they are getting what the market will bear, but from a value position players are poised to get notably overpaid. There is notably more demand than supply of talent and that will drive up the price on a lot of players like it has always done.

I actually hope Griffin isn't hellbent on using his cap space no matter what. If I'm Griffin I have a board and a conservative valuation of guys I want to target and a very low threshold to exceed that before I walk away. This is a young team, it will be fun to watch whether it is Christian Wood, Hayes, and Okafor sharing minutes or throwing in Mirotic(who I would not want to overpay for) or Gasol. And I don't think such acquisitions significantly change the trajectory of the team in the next few seasons, and aren't players on our time schedule anyways, so I wouldn't invest significant resources or sacrifice future flexibility with longer contracts to attain them.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 9:06 pm
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31889 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Then following this logic, there is still no real need to take a lesser return to get off it unless you have some clear imminent use for it. Which is the accompanying argument being made.


Precisely why you want 10mil. As for the picks, going into this draft, you could also argue that most players 4-10 have equally high chance of busting. None of them being groundbreaking.

quote:

And maybe Griffin does, but I go down the list of FA's and they are either going to require overpays, or you get to guys that probably fit under the 18 million we had and arent major needle movers.


10 mil is the difference between 1 decent FA and a bench guy with upside vs 2 decent free agents.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78196 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:18 pm to
I hope We take advantage of having a very young team and maybe see if we can use this money to get some good vets on shorter contracts. That basically will expire by the time we really have to pay any of these kids.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:21 pm to
quote:


10 mil is the difference between 1 decent FA and a bench guy with upside vs 2 decent free agents.



I doubt it in this market. But I hope your optimism beats my realism.

Still not enough for me to want to take this deal over playing hard on the 8 and 10 or better, staying put.



Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

That basically will expire by the time we really have to pay any of these kids.


That is also why I am not in favor of really trying to go big in FA unless by some magic we can get one of the elite guys or one of the solid role players without overpaying or committing major years.

Ingram's contract is up at the end of the season.

Jrue and Ball's contract is up the following offseason.


If I didn't feel this market was going to be notably inflated, or we had a clearer picture of what Zion will be, and how Ball/Ingram/Jrue fit in all this(or don't), I'd be open to taking some risks. But a good free agency for me is either getting an elite guy by some miracle or making wise, conservative signings with flexibility in mind knowing it is impossible to accurately project what this roster will need three seasons from now in terms of second-tier role players and you don't want their contracts limiting your ability to sign or let walk players.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 9:32 pm
Posted by BayouRat15
DAUPHIN ISLAND,AL
Member since Jan 2004
10182 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 9:30 pm to
I'm here for the Saturday night party
Posted by Imember
Houston
Member since May 2019
323 posts
Posted on 6/23/19 at 1:33 am to
I don’t know about realism. This back and forth is more an optimism vs pessimism. You don’t believe Hayes will develop a shot. Some believe he can. I haven’t seen anyone state that his shot is “good to go” as you mentioned. Most seem to be pretty realistic, erring on the optimistic.

You don’t want to spend a ton on a 5, right? Check. They got the top draft 5 (according to most) who won’t break the bank. You want shooters but don’t like giving up the Solo contract. They cleared cap space for shooters. You (we) aren’t aware of imminent use of the space because FA hasn’t started yet. They had the chance to unload and took it.

As far as #4, only Garland (we think) and Hunter even have the shooting chops you’re looking for. I would have been excited (except for his link to the shite posse Klutch clan) and alleged horrid defense. (Do you think he’ll play good enough defense to stay in the floor?). No one else available shoots any better then the players already on the team and the two available have big question marks.

Picked a 5 with tons of potential. Grabbed a shooter in NAW. Picked up yet another future first (maybe). Cleared cap space to open up opportunity. (And yes, saved Gayle some $ as we continue to build). Pels didn’t hit a home run with the trade. But doesn’t seem like they bunted a fly back to the pitcher (to shake up analogies) like you are kind of making it sound.
This post was edited on 6/23/19 at 6:41 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78196 posts
Posted on 6/23/19 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

I need a more convincing case as to why you sacrifice the ten pick for the 17th to get out of an asset that was poised to be positive near the deadline? Because Lowe reported that was the sticking point and we settled for that


I mean That’s called a negotiation.

We wanted 8 and 10

They didn’t want to give 10

So we made them take a Solo.

The reason people like expiring contracts is cap space.

It’s never a bad thing to get rid of a bad contract.

And we have plenty of trade assets if we want a piece at the deadline
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3842 posts
Posted on 6/23/19 at 10:47 pm to
I could live with the Capela comparison
Posted by Jrue
Member since Sep 2015
29 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:30 pm to
Bump
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19097 posts
Posted on 7/8/19 at 10:44 pm to
Did McGee ever murder some chump on ESPN?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram