- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kings would’ve swept us
Posted on 4/17/23 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 4/17/23 at 10:09 pm
They are physical and relentless on D
Posted on 4/17/23 at 10:28 pm to Louisianabound88
They all would have swept us
Posted on 4/17/23 at 10:40 pm to saints5021
Pels would beat the Clippers in a 7 game series
Posted on 4/17/23 at 10:44 pm to Delusional
red velvet on pelicans would have been nice
Posted on 4/17/23 at 11:34 pm to Delusional
Probably bc we have their number
But Playoff Kawhi is a different animal, so possibly not
But Playoff Kawhi is a different animal, so possibly not
Posted on 4/17/23 at 11:50 pm to Louisianabound88
Absolutely. I’m not sure anyone can stop them outside of maybe Boston or Memphis.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 1:37 am to saints5021
quote:
They all would have swept us
Posted on 4/18/23 at 6:21 am to Froman
quote:
I’m not sure anyone can stop them outside of maybe Boston or Memphis.
not memphis.
their bigs Adams and Clarke are out.
they can't deal with Davis.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:33 am to Jnola
quote:
red velvet on pelicans would have been nice
They don’t want to hear that. Could have had Fox and Barnes too. You get Lance and CJ instead.
The denial on this board is real.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:40 am to LivingstonLaw
quote:
Could have had Fox and Barnes too
I'll entertain.
For Josh Hart and a pick? What are you giving up to get Fox/Barnes?
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:44 am to LivingstonLaw
quote:
Could have had Fox and Barnes too. You get Lance and CJ instead.
The Pels were reportedly going hard after Fox before any serious mention of CJ and the Blazers came out. The problem is Sac didn't want our picks, they wanted Sabonis and Indy didn't want our picks, they wanted Haliburton. Which probably seems like the right choice in hindsight for both teams.
After several days of hot and heavy rumors of the Pels trying to work a 3 way with Sac and Indy the rumors start shifting to CJ. Why? Because the Pels chose CJ over Fox? No, because they didn't have what Indy wanted, which means they didn't have what Sac wanted, so they went to Plan B which was CJ.
I wanted Fox way more than CJ, so I was disappointed, but that's the way it went down. The narrative you're pushing so you can feel more justified bitching and moaning about the team is just wrong.
People have been doing the same thing with Beasley and Vanderbilt acting like the Pels chose not to outbid the Lakers. Utah was looking for a specific outcome which included dumping Conley for an expiring. The Lakers outbid the Pels because with Westbrook's contract the Lakers had what Utah was looking for and the Pels didn't.
A bunch of future picks with ambiguous value isn't the deal maker a lot of people seem to think it is. Even Ainge got turned down trying to give up 4 picks for 1 while he had his war chest. It happens.
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 8:51 am
Posted on 4/18/23 at 9:49 am to Louisianabound88
Lol, I bet you that the Warriors win that series. Nothing has happened yet, lol.
Kings are very good, but the Warriors are weathered and are just a better team.
Kings are very good, but the Warriors are weathered and are just a better team.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 10:04 am to CelticDog
quote:
their bigs Adams and Clarke are out
IMO Clarke is a huge loss for them. He’s basically a Zion ‘lite’ and his athleticism and motor is a major weapon coming off the bench, particularly when paired with JJJ inside. They are much less dangerous without him.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 10:17 am to SaintEB
quote:
entertain. For Josh Hart and a pick? What are you giving up to get Fox/Barnes
That is an easy one. FATTY
Posted on 4/18/23 at 10:42 am to LivingstonLaw
quote:Dude is still rolling with this all because of an article stating the Pels were interested in Fox
Could have had Fox
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:09 am to shel311
It wasn’t just an article, jack arse. They had a deal worked out. Sacramento went another way, and the Pels went a different way.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:28 am to LivingstonLaw
quote:They definitely could NOT have had Fox. You are just creating your own story. The Kings traded away Haliburton and chose Fox over him.
They don’t want to hear that. Could have had Fox and Barnes too. You get Lance and CJ instead.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:30 am to fightingtigers98
quote:There was never any mention of a deal being worked out, just interest. What was the deal if you are so sure?
It wasn’t just an article, jack arse. They had a deal worked out. Sacramento went another way, and the Pels went a different way.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:35 am to fightingtigers98
quote:Provide a link.
It wasn’t just an article, jack arse. They had a deal worked out
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 11:36 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News