- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it a turn off to anyone else that Klutch represents Garland?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:02 am
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:02 am
That's the only thing that gives me hesitation with him. The kid would work perfectly with Jrue in that they both can play on or off ball. And we'd have full roster control over him for the next 7-years so it's not like his agent actually matters until then, but after all of this BS that Rich Paul did this past year, I just don't feel like dealing with them.
15
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:20 am to Broski
Yeah I’ve thought about that. But if we really like Garland and wind up keeping the pick we shouldn’t let something like that stop us from taking him. It’s about making the team better at the end of the day.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 5:49 am to Broski
No. Running your franchise based off who your players are represented by is foolish.
Klutch I think has around 26 clients in the NBA. It just so happens we had the one player in the league who desperately wanted to play for the Lakers.
Klutch I think has around 26 clients in the NBA. It just so happens we had the one player in the league who desperately wanted to play for the Lakers.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 5:53 am to Broski
quote:
after all of this BS that Rich Paul did this past year, I just don't feel like dealing with them.
Rest easy, broski. Griffin deals with them, not us fans.
No worries at all there. Klutch should actually love Griff; he, ultimately, executed the deal they wanted.
Griff most likely has a good relationship with LeBron.
Everything should be all good there.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:17 am to Broski
Klutch didn’t invent trying to get his client to another team
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:23 am to Broski
For me it is. If it is for Griffin, we should obviously keep it on the dL.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:26 am to Broski
You're stupid!
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:32 am to Broski
Absolutely. Rich Paul has shown he’s a scumbag. He has completely changed the way owners will handle players managed by Paul. Players have demanded a trade but the way this went down is the worst I’ve ever seen. The pelicans really are lucky the lakers have a terrible front office because most teams wouldn’t have offered near what the lakers did if they were in that situation.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:34 am to Broski
Garland is not going to be the pick if we keep it
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:43 am to Broski
I don’t understand how Garland’s stock actually went higher after only playing 5 games in college and getting injured.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:53 am to Broski
It does and should worry everyone.
He can also pull some frickery by having Garland rush and sign on July 1st, thus doing an end around and giving the Lakers the cap space they would have gotten re July 31 and fricking us.
And I do not trust him in the slightest not to do it.
He can also pull some frickery by having Garland rush and sign on July 1st, thus doing an end around and giving the Lakers the cap space they would have gotten re July 31 and fricking us.
And I do not trust him in the slightest not to do it.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:55 am to Fun Bunch
But couldn’t Paul have Garland do that if ANY team takes him at 4?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 6:58 am to xCptNemo
The Lakers will be picking at 4 no matter who the Pelicans trade the pick to, so technically he will be a Laker until July 6
So the idea is don’t pick Garland at 4 for yourself or anyone else.
I don’t think Paul would actually do it. But I certainly don’t trust the scumbag.
So the idea is don’t pick Garland at 4 for yourself or anyone else.
I don’t think Paul would actually do it. But I certainly don’t trust the scumbag.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:00 am to Lester Earl
I member when Klutch made us trade CP3 to the Clippers, made Denver trade Melo to the NYK, made Minnesota trade KG to Boston and made the Steelers trade AB to the Raiders. Anyone else member?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:06 am to Fun Bunch
I’m just saying that most teams we would want to trade with are interested in Garland at 4, at least as far as the reports go.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:14 am to Broski
quote:
That's the only thing that gives me hesitation with him. The kid would work perfectly with Jrue in that they both can play on or off ball. And we'd have full roster control over him for the next 7-years so it's not like his agent actually matters until then, but after all of this BS that Rich Paul did this past year, I just don't feel like dealing with them.
Are you concerned about Zion signing with CAA? Chris Paul is represented by CAA and he forced his way out of New Orleans.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:15 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
He can also pull some frickery by having Garland rush and sign on July 1st, thus doing an end around and giving the Lakers the cap space they would have gotten re July 31 and fricking us.
And I do not trust him in the slightest not to do it.
This isn't possible.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:25 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
He can also pull some frickery by having Garland rush and sign on July 1st, thus doing an end around and giving the Lakers the cap space they would have gotten re July 31 and fricking us.
Doesn't look like he's making AD decline $4mil to give the Lakers cap space.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:30 am to Broski
We literally just traded Klutchs client to the team he wanted to be traded to. This should not be an issue.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:02 am to Broski
As long as his dad isn't AD's dad I don't care about who represents him
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News