- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harper and Bailey - Rutgers Basketball
Posted on 2/19/25 at 11:21 am to Balsamic_duck
Posted on 2/19/25 at 11:21 am to Balsamic_duck
quote:
I really want Harper if we don’t land Flagg.
dunno man...
Bailey is 6'10" and can play G/F...
Harper is 6'6" and plays G only...
Bailey averages 18.6ppg, 46.6% FG, 36.6% 3PT, 7.4 REB, 1.2 AST
Harper averages 18.5ppg, 44.7% FG, 32.1 % 3PT, 4.7 REB, 4.0 AST
if we don't get Flagg, i'd have a hard time passing up Bailey for Harper
Posted on 2/19/25 at 11:30 am to chRxis
quote:
Bailey is 6'10" and can play G/F...
No, he can't.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 11:50 am to chRxis
quote:
Bailey is 6'10"
Dude's going to be 7'4" by March Madness.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:03 pm to brmark70816
quote:
No, he can't.
yeah, he can... he does... doesn't play much at G now, but in spot duty, to give a little flexibility in certain situations, he absolutely could..
a line up with Murray at point, him and Trey at 2 and 3, whichever playing whichever spot, to go with Zion at the 4 and Missi at 5.... that's a lot of length and athletic ability at the wings... good luck defending it
Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:06 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Dude's going to be 7'4" by March Madness.
dunno, but Rutger's website has him listed at 6'10", 210 lbs... he's got a good frame, even if he's not 6'10", if he's 6'9" or 6'8", he's still physically able to get in there day 1 and hold his own on the court...
Posted on 2/19/25 at 2:38 pm to chRxis
quote:
a line up with Murray at point, him and Trey at 2 and 3, whichever playing whichever spot, to go with Zion at the 4 and Missi at 5.... that's a lot of length and athletic ability at the wings... good luck defending it
So basically the same thing we had with Ingram?
I'm not trying to be a downer, but 6'10 guys shouldn't play guard. Lift a weight or two and they could just play SF or better yet, PF. Guys his size, especially professional athletes should fill out and gain weight. He'll be a big arse wing. But he's not, and shouldn't, play SG..
Posted on 2/19/25 at 3:11 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Dude's going to be 7'4" by March Madness
Which he’ll watch from home.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:57 am to brmark70816
quote:
Lift a weight or two and they could just play SF or better yet, PF.
have you SEEN Bailey? the dude ain't exactly a twig
quote:
But he's not, and shouldn't, play SG..
no one, including me is advocating that that should be his primary position... but he gives you greater flexibility, in certain situations, more so than Harper...
what's hard to understand about that?
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:05 am to brmark70816
quote:
Bailey is 6'10" and can play G/F...
No, he can't.
The 6'10 200lb guard averaging 7.5 rebounds can't play SF?
Maybe less effective at PG and PF but SG/ SF are still forward and guard positions believe it or not.
And he's 18 y/o at 6'10. Dude could be 7' and 230 by the time he's 20 which would be comparable to Ben Simmons who is a PG/ PF.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 11:12 am to Dantheman504
Rutgers beat Washington yesterday with Harper scoring 34 point and Bailey scoring 18
Posted on 2/20/25 at 12:38 pm to chRxis
quote:
dunno, but Rutger's website has him listed at 6'10", 210 lbs... he's got a good frame, even if he's not 6'10", if he's 6'9" or 6'8", he's still physically able to get in there day 1 and hold his own on the court...
He is probably closer to 6'7" than 6'10" from what I see on the court, but that doesn't mean he can't play some PF. Frankly, your lineup is effectively a combo guard, 3 small forwards, and a defensive center. It's a weird lineup. What you gain in length, you lose in lateral quickness. Length is great at the rim and in passing lanes, but you're going to suffer defensively against penetration and movement.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 12:44 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
I don't get the fascination with height and length. The Thunder and Cavs are killing other teams and they are not long. The league is going away from that..
Posted on 2/20/25 at 1:07 pm to sportsfan
Harper is awesome but I hate Bailey’s game. Harper has been dealing with a high ankle sprain.
The big 10 is a great basketball conference, tho.
A lot of their losses are close, by 1 or 2 possessions. Put on the tape vs Bama & Harper was the best player on the floor
The big 10 is a great basketball conference, tho.
A lot of their losses are close, by 1 or 2 possessions. Put on the tape vs Bama & Harper was the best player on the floor
Posted on 2/20/25 at 1:41 pm to Lester Earl
Starting to wonder about some of yall. The thunder arent long? See Chet SGA and Jwill.
Here is a video of Ace and Giannis. Giannis is about 7'. Ace looks slightly smaller. Also Giannis grew after being drafted. Positing Ace might as well is unlikely but not unheralded.
Giannis, Dylan, & Ace
Here is a video of Ace and Giannis. Giannis is about 7'. Ace looks slightly smaller. Also Giannis grew after being drafted. Positing Ace might as well is unlikely but not unheralded.
Giannis, Dylan, & Ace
Posted on 2/20/25 at 2:49 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
He is probably closer to 6'7" than 6'10" from what I see on the court,
then that settles it then, as clearly your eyeballs and vision are superior and elite... i'll notify Rutgers that you settled it for them and they can change his height now
Posted on 2/20/25 at 2:53 pm to six4lsu
quote:
Starting to wonder about some of yall. The thunder arent long? See Chet SGA and Jwill.
They just got back Holmgrem and Hartenstein. Without them, they were very small and still rolled. They have started 6'6 Williams at PF and 6'4 Dort at SF (he's jacked through). SGA is technically the SG, cause they start Wallace a ton. Their top 2 subs are Wiggins and Joe, who both are about 6'6. It's just not a huge team.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 6:38 pm to brmark70816
Yeah bc of positional size and length. Honestly Ive never heard anyone say height and length are overrated in basketball. Of course you have to shoot but especially if you dont have positional height and length.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:21 pm to chRxis
quote:
then that settles it then, as clearly your eyeballs and vision are superior and elite... i'll notify Rutgers that you settled it for them and they can change his height now
Wanna take a ban bet on which he's closer to at the combine?
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:23 pm to six4lsu
quote:
Here is a video of Ace and Giannis. Giannis is about 7'. Ace looks slightly smaller. Also Giannis grew after being drafted. Positing Ace might as well is unlikely but not unheralded.
Giannis, Dylan, & Ace
That's the same day Ace told Gianni's he was 6'7"
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:43 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Wanna take a ban bet on which he's closer to at the combine?
no, b/c i dont' really give a frick... again, i went with what Rutgers has... neither you nor I KNOW, for certain, what his height is... you may be right, i may be wrong... so what? i , like you, won't lose any sleep over it...
Popular
Back to top


2



