Started By
Message

re: Early Trade Speculation...

Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:08 am to
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I just can’t understand the logic of spending even more assets in a trade to continue to build around Zion when he’s coming off his 4th year out of 6 playing 30 games or less.


Because you can't look at it as "spending more assets to build around Zion"

Adding that player either enhances our team and contending abilities or makes trading Zion easier because we have another star on the roster.

Its "building around Zion" by default as Z is our best player. But its really "building for the future".

If we actually land a player that will be on the roster for 3+ years and makes us better then what do we really lose trading 2-3 picks that may end up in the 20's?

Worst case scenario is that you trade Zion, get your picks back or young assets, and still have another star to build around.

You aren't doing it for Zion, you are doing it for the franchise. If it works out for Zion then great if it doesn't then ship his arse out and restart in a possibly better position than before.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 10:09 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:21 am to
With these (5) assets we could have $65-$70MIL available:

CJ: $30.6MIL
Olynyk: 13.4MIL
Jose: $4.5MIL
Hawk: $4.5 MIL

Bruce Brown: S&T $10-$15MIL

We could take back $35MIL from trading CJ and $27 MIL from trading Olynyk/ Hawk/ Jose.

So lose those guys but add $35mil/ $27MIL/ $15MIL/ Top 5

Any (2) of Bane/ Ayton/ Bridges/ Claxton/ Hero/ Porzingas/ Poole/ Quickly/ Barrett/ Allen/ Kuzma/ JJJ/ Wiggins/ Vassell/ Randle/ Lamelo/ Maxey/ MPJ/ Brunson/ Sexton/ Collins/ Green/ Keldon J/ Josh Hart/ Robinson/ Monk/ Pat Williams

Some of those contracts we may be able to take back (3) of those group. And still have a TPE from Brown.

The $53MIL between those (4) players means we can take back up to $66MIL back and have a solid TPE from Brown to add another glue piece.

So we could technically bring in (3) of Cam J/ Allen/ Sexton/ Claxton/ Miles Bridges/ Josh Hart/ Monk/ Collins
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 4:35 pm
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31892 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Idk why everyone is so obsessed with just getting Cooper. It’s unlikely to happen. But this is one of the deepest drafts in a while and you’re still going to get someone who probably would’ve been the first pick last year to add to an ok roster. It’s been a rough season, I think it’s embarrassing they haven’t fired Willie, but this board is way too negative about things. Harper, Bailey, Tre Johnson, etc could all easily end up being franchise pieces.


It's deep similarly to the 2019 draft.

Zion was a generational talent, just like Flagg.
Morant, Barrett, Garland, Hunter were all talented as well you still want that #1 guy. Let's say in the best case we land 1 and trade for 4. Wouldn't you feel better about moving zion because you have Flagg rather than say harper? Because I sure would.
Posted by tigre704
Member since Nov 2018
1840 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Wouldn't you feel better about moving zion because you have Flagg rather than say harper? Because I sure would.


This is where I feel like there’s a disconnect. Why move on at all? If you were able to get a franchise piece on a rookie contract, why not play it out for 2 years and see what you have? Personally I love the guards in this class. Not as much as Cooper but I’m certain at least one of them is going to hit. Harper especially. The Pels problem isn’t that they have Zion. The problem is the reliance and need for him to be healthy in order to win. If you draft a player that can take that mantle away from Zion and he becomes a 2nd/3rd option you end up being in a much better spot.

The big problem Griff is tasked with is that you’re just not going to get a better basketball player than Zion in a trade. The return isn’t going to be there besides picks, and frankly Zion carries so much bad press with his name that I doubt one of these loser franchises would ever be willing to take that chance on him.


If the Pels could get a deal commensurate with Zion’s ability on the court, they should do that immediately. The problem is I just don’t see that happening and so you’re just stuck.
Posted by 504Voodoo
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
13766 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:09 pm to
Sabonis isn't a star. He would be a very good #3 option on a championship team, but you aren't competing at a high level if he is your #1 or #2 option.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

He would be a very good #3 option on a championship team, but you aren't competing at a high level if he is your #1 or #2 option.


This isn't true. Sabonis is 100% a #2. He's averaging 19pts/ 13 reb/ 7.5 ast the last (3) years.

He is a bad #2 on a team like ours because you can't have your #1 and #2 at PF/ C. He is 100% a #2 on a team with a star PG/ SG.

The issue there is having a perfect #3 and role players.

When you have teams like OKC/ BOS your #2 and #3 can be way closer in skill than a team with no bench and (2) stars.

If Sabonis goes to GSW he is #2 and Jimmy is #3.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 12:34 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103115 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

If Sabonis goes to GSW he is #2 and Jimmy is #3.


Making Jimmy the #3 likely wouldn’t end well if he decides he’s fed up.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:46 pm to
Center rankings with injury history/ age included is really:

1. Jokic
2. Wemby
3. Sabonis
3. Bam
5. Sengun
6. AD
7. Embiid
8. Chet
9. Porzingis
10. Gobert
11. Myles Turner
12. Jarrett Allen

And you could probably rearrange #8-#12

Sabonis is in that elite top (5) group. Which is really (7) with a healthy AD/ Embiid but yeah.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Making Jimmy the #3 likely wouldn’t end well if he decides he’s fed up.


Sucks for Jimmy. Maybe he should do better than a 18/5/5 average the last 3 seasons. That's good to average #3 stats at worst and terrible #2 stats at best. That's essentially BI with less offense.

And Jimmy wasn't even the #1 on his own team Bam was... And Sabonis is arguably better or equal to Bam rounding out the top (4) Centers behind Wemby/ Jokic
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 1:04 pm
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

This is where I feel like there’s a disconnect. Why move on at all? If you were able to get a franchise piece on a rookie contract, why not play it out for 2 years and see what you have?


Because Zion wakes way too much money to play 35 games a year. He's also a pretty wonky fit with any modern NBA roster because he has to have the ball in his hand to be effective. Then when he leaves the court, you either need a ball-dominant guard to drive the ship, or the rest of your guys have to start running a completely different offense. He has broken our roster construction.
Posted by New City Champ
Member since Jul 2018
631 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 4:46 pm to
Yeah, Sabonis only works if it's a trade FOR Zion. I wouldn't pair them.

A good reset, or soft rest, from our current position would involve some lottery luck + other teams being incentivized to trade a star player on their roster (like that player requesting the trade).

So...just a long offseason hypothetical where Pels get some breaks go their way:

-Tyrese Maxey quietly requests a trade from the 76ers;

-Pels wind up with the #2 overall pick;

-Pels package #2 pick, Pacers' 2026 first rounder and CJ McCollum for Maxey. 76ers come way with Dylan Harper, CJ and a first rounder.

-Sabonis asks for a trade from the Kings;

-Pels agree to trade Zion for Sabonis + their 2025 first round pick which ends up in the 12-14 range;

-Pels end up with Sabonis and, say, Collin Murray Boyles at pick 14;

-Pels offseason reset is Zion, McCollum, Dylan Harper & Pacers 2026 pick go out; Sabonis, Maxey & Murray-Boyles come in.

-Pels start Maxey/Herb/Trey/Olenyk/Sabonis and Jose/Hawk/Boston/Murray Boyles/Missi as second unit with a deep bench of Karlo/Reeves/Payton/Brooks/JRE. Dejounte is a mid-season add back and probably you would tinker with roster at that point. You could obviously tinker with the line ups.

This is a pretty optimistic scenario but not outrageous. I'm sure a lot of you would rather the Pels have Harper + Zion rather than Sabonis, Maxey and a mid-first, but I think I'm actually being generous to Pels. They might have to include more assets if this hypo was IRL...
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11183 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:22 am to
I had proposed a trade at the deadline, with Zion going to the Lakers for Reaves and Hachimura, plus a future 1st. I just saw a site propose the same deal. If the Lakers flame out 1st or 2nd round, they are going to want to take a huge swing. Pairing Zion with Luka is the kind of big deal they would want.

If we got Flagg and put him with two great shooters in Reaves and Murphy, that is an awesome core group. We can keep McCollum, till Murray comes back. I'd resign Payton and JRE. Look to offload Hawkins and Alvarado.

McCollum/Payton/(Murray)
Reaves/Reeves or Boston
Murphy/Jones
Flagg/Hachimura/JRE
Missi/Olynyk/Matkovic

That's a .500 team with a ton of upside next season. We would have the contracts and flexibility to adjust how we need. I just don't want to rush back Murray, Jones and Murphy coming back from pretty harsh injuries. So we need a lot of depth early to limit their minutes.
Posted by New City Champ
Member since Jul 2018
631 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 1:11 am to
Continue to be rumbles that Maxey will ask out of Philly.

Assuming Pels land top 4 pick would you accept this? It's a trade that I think all 3 fan bases might have problems with, so I think it's actually realistic...

Nets:
-Zion Williamson

76ers:
-Cameron Johnson + salary
-Bucks 2025 1st round pick
-Pels 2025 1st round pick
-Pacers 2026 1st round pick

Pels:
-Tyrese Maxey
-Nets 2025 1st round pick
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 1:24 am
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7752 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 4:23 am to
It’s really too bad that D Griff and Company decided to draft Theresa Weatherspoon’s nephew instead of actually scouting other guards in that draft

I’d love to have Maxey on the team, but he should’ve already been on the team at the low price of pick 13.

But theoretically going along with this trade idea

I’d 100% rather Maxey be our franchise guy instead of Zion

You lose about 10% talent and upside, but would gain exponentially in availability, character, charisma, and overall longevity. Let’s be honest, Z has maybe 2-3 years left of peak/prime basketball if he can stay healthy. Maxey has about 8 years left of peak and a much more varied and nuanced offensive game that actually fits the modern math competition nba.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11183 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Assuming Pels land top 4 pick would you accept this? It's a trade that I think all 3 fan bases might have problems with, so I think it's actually realistic...



I don't know if this can't be considered without knowing the draft positions. I believe you are saying that the Nets pick later, so we would be trading back from like 4 to something like the 6th pick.

So we would be doing a swap (from 4 to 6), give up a mid-ish 1st in 2026, and Zion for Maxey?

Yeah, I would do that deal in a heartbeat.
Posted by New City Champ
Member since Jul 2018
631 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 8:29 am to
I would too. Realistically, this deal would have a much better chance if Pels land the 2nd overall pick so that Philly gets Dylan Harper, Cam Johnson and two additional first rounders for Maxey and even then I think they only do it if Maxey demands a trade.

On the Nets side, they'd have to view Z as a cornerstone guy, a still young player with top-10 super star potential in a new environment. All of which could be true if Zion's commitment this year to being in condition wasn't a one-off mirage. Would help if Bill Duffy can work same kind of magic for Z that he did for Luka.

For Pels, landing a guy like Maxey while staying in the top 10 of this year's draft is pretty close to the best case scenario on a Zion exit. It could be, in my scenario, that the Brooklyn pick would have to be routed to Philly as well to pry Maxey loose and trump other offers, so that the 76ers wound up with our pick, their own pick and Brooklyn's pick, three top 10 selections in a great draft, to turbo charge their rebuild around Embiid. That's a lot of rooks, but this is the year to have them. They could also re-route one or two of those top-10 selections in a deal for another veteran star or to unload that terrible Paul George contract.

If Pels could pair Maxey with Herb that's a pretty strong, balanced, back court duo to go with Trey and a top-10 rookie at the other forward spot like Queen or Murray-Boyles and the young centers. I could live with that and working with CJ and DeJounte as other value pieces to garner additional assets.

Another simpler scenario, of course, is for Pels to keep the pick and just roll with a Harper or Ace Bailey or Edgecombe themselves and see what else they could pick up in a general auction of Zion's contract and other assets.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:15 am to
quote:

For Pels, landing a guy like Maxey while staying in the top 10 of this year's draft is pretty close to the best case scenario on a Zion exit.


I personally would rather 1 of the packages from OKC/ Hou depending on what players are offered but Maxey would be there in the top 3.

How would y'all rate these (4) packages? Note that picks can be given or owed depending on the packages:

1. OKC- Jalen Williams/ Isaiah Joe/ A Wiggins
2. HOU- Jabari Smith/ Cam Whitmore/ Eason
3. PHIL- Maxey
4. CHA- Brandon Miller/ Miles Bridges

Before people say " ____ won't trade ____ for Zion just know that teams want Zion and they will give up a solid player to do so.

Realistically Zion + (1-2) 1st should get us most of these packages. Maybe even without (1) or more 1sts.

We would also still have CJ/ Jose/ Hawk/ Olynyk.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17336 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:45 am to
We would be receiving picks in any of your scenarios, we are not trading Zion + picks for anyone aside from Giannis, Jokic or Luka
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5817 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:29 am to
quote:

We would be receiving picks in any of your scenarios, we are not trading Zion + picks for anyone aside from Giannis, Jokic or Luka


I only this because I'm not sure of Zion's exact value. But yeah I do agree we probably wouldn't need to attach picks.

On the other end why the frick would we trade Zion and picks for a 31 y/o Giannis? Crazy
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103115 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

On the other end why the frick would we trade Zion and picks for a 31 y/o Giannis? Crazy


Why the frick would Giannis want to go anywhere that isn’t a contender?

Milwaukee may be boxed in on what they can do but they did what they could to try and keep the team competitive.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram