Started By
Message

re: Devonte Graham to Pelicans for first round 2022 lottery-protected pick 4yrs/47 million

Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:35 am to
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:35 am to
quote:

and we gave a 1st for Adams then later had to give another 1st to get off of Adams(and Bled)


And you also received JV in return.
Why leave out key parts of a trade?
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
31364 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:39 am to
It just sucks he wasted an entire yr and 3 picks.

On top of that it's hard to get players here so he could've used those to trade for brogdon or sexton.

Even if you had to give an extra first and overpay, at least you were using it on a good player.
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:40 am to
Who is playing center for you in this dream scenario?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452320 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:40 am to
quote:

On top of that it's hard to get players here so he could've used those to trade for brogdon or sexton.

That's what I said earlier, but speaking of Myles Turner
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
31364 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:43 am to
Anyone.

Even if billy and jaxson played center all yr you would've been in the same place.

You get a javale mcgee type player.
Only way you pay for a center if it's someone who is elite or can do multiple things well.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 9:45 am
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Even if billy and jaxson played center all yr you would've been in the same place.


Are you saying JV is the same place as playing those two all year?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:48 am to
quote:

which I get the argument of "well these picks aren't likely to matter" but I also look at them as nice filler when/if ever we make a move for that 3rd star.
Agreed

Plus, we only see "well these picks aren't likely to matter" when we give one up. If the picks aren't likely to matter then Chicago would have given us one for Lonzo.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:49 am to
quote:

And you also received JV in return.
Why leave out key parts of a trade?

I understand that deal had multiple parts but you really think we got of of Adams and Bled for free? Of course not, part of that deal was us paying for that.
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:51 am to
quote:

understand that deal had multiple parts but you really think we got of of Adams and Bled for free? Of course not, part of that deal was us paying for that.


No. I am not. But using 2 1st rounds picks to make a point and leaving off JV is just wrong.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 9:52 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172438 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:52 am to
Ok. i'm on board. Devonte Graham is a cheap version of Damian Lillard. Lets go.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13106 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:52 am to
quote:

No. I am not. But using 2 1st rounds picks to make a point and leaving off JV is just wrong.
Whole deal also included moving down from 10 to 17. That could easily be seen as the compensation for JV.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:54 am to
quote:

get the argument of "well these picks aren't likely to matter" but I also look at them as nice filler when/if ever we make a move for that 3rd star


They still have picks to add a 3rd star if that opportunity presents itself


The Pelicans can’t build a team regularly through free agency, they have zero momentum as a franchise.

They can’t afford to build through the draft because they don’t have the time to do wait on that.


They are forced to push the issue a little bit. They’ve lost picks but have also mitigated the risk surrounding those deals. It’s not exactly franchise crippling
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Whole deal also included moving down from 10 to 17. That could easily be seen as the compensation for JV.


Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:56 am to
quote:

No. I am not.
So what part of my argument you don't agree with?

We used a 1st to get Adams, we gave up picks to get off of Adams/Bled. Yes, we got Jval but nothing I said is untrue.

We got dudes with a 1st and 1 year later gave up a 1st to get off of these dudes.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I'm fine with Barnes at the 4


Are we playing Zion at the 3 or the 5 in this scenario? I know we are in the era of position less basketball, but Zion hasn’t showed yet that he can anchor a defense or guard guys in the perimeter.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452320 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Are we playing Zion at the 3 or the 5 in this scenario?

well after acquiring Graham, defense is a tertiary strategy for our team and offensively Zion is basically a point, so neither
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 10:01 am
Posted by Mystery
Member since Jan 2009
9064 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:02 am to
Leaving JV out of that trade is just being misleading to make a point. I don't agree with that. Hyperbole isn't needed.

Yes, factually picks were used to get off of two contracts.
But those picks also yielded a pretty good player in a position of need. That could be an asset or a future long term player, baring how he fits.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 10:03 am
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
12042 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:03 am to
Barnes plays both the 3 and the 4. It'll be easy to get him minutes when we stagger Zion and BI.
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12907 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:04 am to
What's a realistic scenario for Barnes here?
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:05 am to
Sure. And I’m not saying Barnes wouldn’t work on the team, I’m just pushing back a little on this “perfect fit” narrative that I’ve seen pop up a few times on here. 2016 Barnes is a perfect fit, 2021 Barnes is an okay fit.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 10:06 am
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram