Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Would There Have Been A British Invasion Without The Beatles?

Posted on 11/3/17 at 7:02 pm
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19244 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 7:02 pm

If so, when? And who would have led it, if anyone?

And make a legitimate case, not some vague sooner-or-later arguement.

(Yes this is a response thread to those saying the Beatles were overrated.)
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39195 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 7:21 pm to
If not The Beatles it would have been The Rolling Stones a few years later.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26995 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 7:57 pm to
Question can't be answered without a touch of they ghey. What other band was "cute". The 13 year old girl factor is what put them on the map. Period. Took 5 years and psychedelics for people to realize their greatness.

Stones were mentioned. I guess The Who would be the other.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141958 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 8:25 pm to
No

There had already been a UK group w/a #1 hit here: The Tornados and "Telstar". But they had zero impact otherwise.

The scruffy Stones, even the cleaned-up early Stones, would never have gotten anywhere without The Beatles establishing a beachhead for them. Unlike The Fabs, who were superstars from the moment they set foot on US soil, The Stones stumbled at first -- at one point they played in support of The Rivieras ("California Sun") at a show in Minnesota.

The Stones had their first UK hit w/a Len-Mac song. They probably wouldn't have gotten very far at home w/o the Beatles, much less gone to America.

Remember, manager Andrew Loog Oldham specifically marketed the Stones as the anti-Beatles.
This post was edited on 11/3/17 at 8:28 pm
Posted by OldTigahFot
Drinkin' with the rocket scientists
Member since Jan 2012
10502 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Remember, manager Andrew Loog Oldham specifically marketed the Stones as the anti-Beatles.


They were often referred to on pop radio as " the Dirty Uglies".
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10941 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 5:36 am to
quote:

And make a legitimate case, not some vague sooner-or-later arguement.

it was inevitable - good enough ?

While there was some original popular music here, think Beach Boys, a lot of it was formula music (by music exec's) much like today, and the Beatles were a breath(e) of fresh air(e). Even Elvis (give me a white kid that sounds black) was part of a formula. Yeah, these guys were reinventing their stuff from what had already worked, but it was without the rock-n-roll management. Helped that they were not just selling the drugs-sex angle... so yeah it was inevitable... because everyone was insatiable for something different but real. I imagine it certainly helped that they were mired in the dirt of the German club scene, so they knew what sold the hard way, instead of being told play it like this. And while they had the chops to go along with the looks, there was still this vacuum waiting be filled, a next step in musical evolution. Much like urban kids did with hip-hop, it was time for something new, they just didn't literally scratch the surface of what was there. The British took 50's rock to the next logical step the one American's could of and would have, but weren't allowed due to market share (from the industry).
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19244 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Question can't be answered without a touch of they ghey. What other band was "cute". The 13 year old girl factor is what put them on the map. Period.


Disagee. It was their harmonies, melodies, guitars and beat that put them on the map. They were fresh and exciting, like 1956 Elvis was compared to the Perry Como's and Tony Bennett's of the early 50's.

Here are the No. 1 hits leading up to the arrival of the Beatles...

August 31-September14: "My Boyfriend's Back" - The Angels
September 21-October05: "Blue Velvet" - Bobby Vinton
October 12-November 09: "Sugar Shack" - Jimmy Gilmer And The Fireballs
November 16: "Deep Purple" - Nino Tempo & April Stevens
November 23-30: "I'm Leaving It Up To You" - Dale & Grace
December 07-28: "Dominique" - The Singing Nun (Soeur Sourire)
January 04-25: "There! I've Said It Again" - Bobby Vinton



So while they didn't immediately kill off the teen idols and the girl groups of Phil Spector, they totally redefined the boundaries of popular music and American culture. The 50's were offically dead (whether the body immediately knew it) and all you have to do is listen to these tunes and then listen to the early Beatles American releases.

It was a seismic sonic shift. They were their own Wall Of Sound compared to what was before.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38690 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:30 pm to
Yes, the skiffle movement... Which was similar to rockabilly in the US, was huge in Britain before the Beatles broke. So there were countless young guys playing guitar and writing songs in the skiffle vernacular.... And that included the future Beatles. And that's why the British Invasion happened.... It wasn't just the Beatles, they just broke through and all those young Englishmen playing Skiffle were ready to form pop rock bands.
Posted by tigers1956
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
4778 posts
Posted on 11/5/17 at 8:24 pm to
The Beatles in a lot of ways were in the right place at the right time. Both politically and music wise...the country was at crossroads and the war was getting started...it was the youth of America vs the establishment. Also too the drug culture was beginning to become a factor.
Like I said right place at the right time.
.they were something different and a breath of fresh air for the youth of america
Posted by hogcard1964
Illinois
Member since Jan 2017
10442 posts
Posted on 11/6/17 at 1:01 pm to
No

...and Keith Richards has acknowledged this several times.

"The Beatles kicked that door in and we kind of held it open."

...No Beatles... no modern rock-n-roll.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202916 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:17 am to
Could not have said it better.....
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
65962 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 8:27 am to
would have been more like the British Visit.
Posted by litenin
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
2350 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 8:46 am to
Way before my time but probably my favorite music era of all-time. What about The Kinks? I rarely hear them mentioned as one of the all-time greats but they have a lot of big hits and are somewhat similar to The Beatles.
Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
7918 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 8:16 pm to
No
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26178 posts
Posted on 11/12/17 at 8:07 pm to
Better question, would there have been the Beatles without American rock 'n roll?
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27967 posts
Posted on 11/12/17 at 8:52 pm to
I don't know,The Beatles had The right sound,look,and public persona for the time. Perfect storm. I'm not sure any other team would have pulled it off.
When I say "team" I'm not just talking about the band.Without The Beatles happening,there would have been British Rock'n'Roll coming across the pond,but not to the same extent.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26178 posts
Posted on 11/12/17 at 8:59 pm to
Then again, who's to say that "Blue Velvet", "Sugar Shack", "Deep Purple" and "Dominique" aren't as musically worthy as the early Beatles recordings?

I seem to remember "Louie Louie" being out around that time as well.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141958 posts
Posted on 11/12/17 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Then again, who's to say that "Blue Velvet", "Sugar Shack", "Deep Purple" and "Dominique" aren't as musically worthy as the early Beatles recordings?

I seem to remember "Louie Louie" being out around that time as well.
It hit #2 a few weeks before the Beatles came to America. It was kept out of #1 by The Singing Nun's "Dominique"

I hate the myth that rock "died" in the early '60s -- there was Motown, Spector, The Brill Building in NY, Toussaint in NO, Beach Boys -- but it's not really germane to the OP so I didn't address it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram