Started By
Message

re: What Makes Nirvana Great?

Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:56 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88058 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Cobain was a helluva songwriter.
Has this ever been supported? If so, I've not seen it, and I like Nirvana.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Also, Nirvana killed off the hair bands and reformatted rock radio.

This cannot be understated. Rock radio changed almost overnight. One day, it's all Motley Crue and Poison and suddenly, those mascara bands were nowhere to be found. It's a little more complex than Nirvana killed hair metal, but they were the public face of it, and the were pretty open about their complete contempt for that scene.

And "grunge" was a marketing term (ironically, first used to describe Mudhoney, their labelmates). They were a punk band. 1991 is the year punk broke.
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6856 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:57 am to
I'd recommend this book if anyone's interested enough. It gives great background from the bands, themselves. There's a ton of great music to discover in there, too.

LINK
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:59 am to
I preferred Everybody Loves Our Town. But same thing - an oral history of Seattle music in the 90s. You definitely got the feel that, as a general rule, the more successful a band got, the unhappier its members are today (Pearl Jam being the biggest exception).
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6856 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:07 am to
I've got both. They're both great reads.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:18 am to
If memory serves me right, Nirvana were scheduled to play the Art Bar (BR) in the fall of '91... That all changed, literally overnight...

If for no other reason, their influence on radio at the time is enough, never mind the fallout of the few years after (I mean, this movement killed a great college radio station at the time (KLSU) and moved it into an "alternative" format.. does everyone remember the SUKS stickers?
This post was edited on 12/17/12 at 9:21 am
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11552 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:23 am to
quote:

And eventually gave rise to dad rock bands like Creed and Nickleback....yeah, no thanks.


Holding that against Nirvana seems awfully silly.

Plus it’s not like it is difficult to avoid listening to those bands. Sure, Nickelback and Creed are bad, but that has zero impact on my life. I simply just don’t listen to them.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
173841 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:49 am to
heart shaped box FTW
This post was edited on 12/17/12 at 9:50 am
Posted by Kayhill Brown
Member since May 2010
940 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:58 am to
Kurt could write some very catchy songs. A lot of them were heavy songs, but essentially pop songs.

If you want to make an argument about the musicianship, you have a point that the songs aren't "hard to play". But I'm always more impressed by melodies than a 10 minute wankfest guitar solo.

Plus Kurt's voice. That's a powerful voice.
Posted by Kayhill Brown
Member since May 2010
940 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:02 am to
I also have a particular place in my heart for Nirvana because reading about them introduced me to so many bands (Sonic Youth, Pixies, Black Flag, Vaselines, Dinosaur Jr, etc etc).

I owe a lot of my taste and interest in music to them for their constant promotion and support of great bands.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
74082 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:08 am to
quote:

This cannot be understated. Rock radio changed almost overnight. One day, it's all Motley Crue and Poison and suddenly, those mascara bands were nowhere to be found. It's a little more complex than Nirvana killed hair metal, but they were the public face of it, and the were pretty open about their complete contempt for that scene
yea and to add to that.

They helped change the way rock lyrics were written as well

instead of talking about girls, girls, girls,(pun intended), they wrote introspective lyrics, made it "cool" to talk about legitimate feelings. In other words, rock wasn't about partying so much as it became another medium of self expression and therapy
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
64081 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:10 am to
(
quote:

KLSU) and moved it into an "alternative" format.. does everyone remember the SUKS stickers?


KLSU (WPRG before that) was always an alternative rock station. They were the station you could hear punk/new wave/local bands/blues, etc., that got no airplay on the disco-oriented/hair band commercial radio stations. They started sucking when they began playing cRap.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29424 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:19 am to
quote:

This cannot be understated. Rock radio changed almost overnight. One day, it's all Motley Crue and Poison and suddenly, those mascara bands were nowhere to be found. It's a little more complex than Nirvana killed hair metal, but they were the public face of it, and the were pretty open about their complete contempt for that scene.


Yup. That's why Nirvana is big. It was the "movement" they put a face to. To top it off, their onstage antics, Kurt's instability, and their "don't give a frick" attitude just magnified things.

Musically, they were beautiful. Total chaos. Kurt wailing, Krist grooving out, and Dave beating the ever living shite out of his drums. Somehow it all came together and sounded good though. Organized chaos.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:21 am to
Well, I guess I wasnt clear enough... KLSU was "alternative" before in the sense of a free format college radio station... yes, you could hear a Willie Nelson song followed by a 30 minute Henry Rollins spoken word clip...

After the aforementioned movement, they went to a "modern rock/alternative" format very similar to mainstream radio where you heard the same alternative hits 3/4 times a day... there was very little to no individuality to the DJs.
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6856 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:23 am to
For viewing: LINK

Nice doc. Couldn't find a cheap DVD copy on there, but eBay may have one.
Posted by oompaw
In piney hill country...
Member since Dec 2007
6271 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:23 am to
quote:

they are vastly overrated


this
Posted by TigerRanter
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
6856 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:31 am to
I could see how one could think they're overrated musically, even though I disagree. Their importance to rock history cannot be understated or overrated, imo.
This post was edited on 12/17/12 at 10:36 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88058 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:32 am to
quote:

a 30 minute Henry Rollins spoken word clip...
Hated it when they did that. Was thankful for WBRH.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:34 am to
quote:

1991 is the year punk broke.


If anyone hasnt seen that documentary (1991: The Year Punk Broke), its great... predates the Nirvana breakout (barely) and has incredible live footage...
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 10:38 am to
Yeah, I was consciously making that reference. What's great is that it was filmed as a documentary on Sonic Youth, but things changed as they were making it. The opening act became the story.

I still use Flea's definition for alternative though: It means that you are European, have a female bandmember, or have a funny haircut. It works pretty well, though it does exclude Nirvana.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram