- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/4/25 at 7:42 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Both are great, but I have Sabotage ahead unless you factor in the number of songs.
Obviously you are not factoring in the quality of songs
Sabotage is heavy a.f. but there is nothing on it like Kashmir, Sick Again, Ten Years Gone, In My Time of Dying....I could go on and on.....
Physical Graffiti beats out Sabotage hands down
Posted on 8/4/25 at 8:17 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
Kashmir, Sick Again, Ten Years Gone, In My Time of Dying....I could go on and on.....
Ten Years Gone is awesome but you can go on and on mainly because it is a double album. I'm not saying PG isn't great, but it has a number of songs i don't care for unlike I, II, IV and Houses of the Holy (minus the Crunge, which belonged on PG).
Posted on 8/4/25 at 9:24 pm to BogeyTX
Even when you remove the covers (the one gripe people have with Zeppelin and vastly exaggerated in number) they still had more stone cold classics than anyone outside of the Beatles.
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:10 am to BogeyTX
If you could come up with some truly objective way to measure how 'good' bands are, LZ would beat out Sabbath every time for a lot of reasons.
But I'm really torn here. And I think its because they are so different. I like both for what they are.
But I'm really torn here. And I think its because they are so different. I like both for what they are.
Posted on 8/5/25 at 3:23 pm to Kashmir
quote:
Kashmir
That song tripped me out the first time I heard it and have loved it ever since.
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:59 pm to Morgus
The Stones recorded more stone cold classics before Zeppelin even formed. Look at their catalog from 1963 to 1969.
Posted on 8/5/25 at 6:45 pm to Bayou
quote:
What a crappy comparison???
This.
Almost no one thinks Sabbath is better or that Iommi is better than Page. That doesn't detract from Sabbath's greatness, despite Keith Richards' asinine opinion. Might as well ask if the Beatles were better than Tears for Fears.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:12 am to mdomingue
quote:
in that genre
Are we still pretending that Led Zeppelin was metal in some way?
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:23 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Are we still pretending that Led Zeppelin was metal in some way?
Aw, look at you trying to be all edgy and stuff.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:33 am to hogcard1964
quote:
The Stones recorded more stone cold classics before Zeppelin even formed. Look at their catalog from 1963 to 1969.
The majority of which are cover tunes. The Rolling Stones "World's Greatest Blues Cover Band" is more accurate. In their current iteration "The Rolling Stones Geriatric Cover Band" is their status.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:39 am to Johnny Carson
quote:
The majority of which are cover tunes. The Rolling Stones "World's Greatest Blues Cover Band"
Aftermath and Between the Buttons do not have any covers and Beggar's Banquet only has one.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:52 am to mdomingue
quote:
Aw, look at you trying to be all edgy and stuff.
Edgy? I love both bands and would pick LZ over Sabbath if I was forced to (but I'm not). Led Zeppelin was not metal, though. They may have influenced a lot of metal bands, but that doesn't make Blind Lemon Johnson a rock musician.
Blue Oyster Cult is a much more interesting comp to Sabbath.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:54 am to rebelrouser
quote:
By albums:
Black Sabbath vs. I = LZ
Paranoid vs. II =BS (this BS is perfection)
Master of Reality vs. III =BS (but close as both a bit of a let down)
Vol. 4 vs. IV =LZ and not really close
Sabbath B.S. vs. HOH =LZ
Sabotage vs. PG =BS (another awesome entry by BS and PG has some throw away material but lots of songs)
Technical Ecstasy vs. Presence =LZ
Pretty close by album and a tie if you leave off their respective seventh albums.
I feel like you've waited 30 years to make this exact post.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:58 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Never a big fan of Zep but after learning of their thievery, kinda soured on them.
Yeah same here. Zeppelin sounds just like Willie Dixon to me too.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 2:16 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
I feel like you've waited 30 years to make this exact post.
No but i was having a discussion recently about the top ten bands of all time and i came up w/ the somewhat arbitrary requirement that each one have at least six great albums so i was thinking about that.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 6:12 pm to Johnny Carson
quote:
The majority of which are cover tunes. The Rolling Stones "World's Greatest Blues Cover Band" is more accurate. In their current iteration "The Rolling Stones Geriatric Cover Band" is their status.
...and they weren't sued by the original artists because they claimed they wrote them. They gave them credit.
However, I agree with your current take on them. IMO they haven't done anything interesting since Voodoo Lounge.
I take that back. A Bigger Bang had a handful of solid tracks on it.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 8/6/25 at 7:42 pm to BogeyTX
Z E P P E L I N
not even close
not even close
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:16 pm to deltadummy
quote:
Almost no one thinks Sabbath is better
Then almost no one is correct
quote:
Might as well ask if the Beatles were better than Tears for Fears.
I agree that there's no need to directly compare black Sabbath and Zeppelin, but this is a particularly dumb analogy.
Popular
Back to top



1












