Started By
Message

re: Friday Music Board Challenge: Pink Floyd vs. Queen

Posted on 8/18/12 at 8:33 am to
Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
4406 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 8:33 am to
Queen
Posted by Sidbarret
Charleston, SC
Member since Apr 2008
625 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 8:34 am to
floyd. Queen is good stuff, but not in the same league.
Posted by bagNdrag
Member since Dec 2010
1910 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 8:51 am to
Damn this is super tough. Gotta go with Queen though.
Posted by redneck hippie
Oklahoma
Member since Dec 2008
6473 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:11 am to
I always feel like I'm missing something with Queen. I get they have some quality stuff in their catalog but I can't imagine anyone thinking they are even close to a band like Pink Floyd.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4464 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:19 am to
Queen
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35652 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:27 am to
Floyd
Posted by Hamstonian
Birmingham
Member since Oct 2010
370 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:37 am to
Queen.
Posted by tigermeat
Member since Jan 2005
3371 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:37 am to
Pink Floyd
Posted by ThibodauxBengal
Member since Apr 2006
397 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 9:46 am to
Pink Floyd and it's not close for me. Love Queen but PF is in a whole other league.

Dark Side of the Moon was on the charts EVERY week for 15 YEARS STRAIGHT and is tied for 2nd place as the all time best selling album worldwide. The Wall is tied for 20th.

Queen has no album in the top 70 except for a greatest hits album at number 42. That's as high (70's) as the list I found went.

Again, I am not knocking Queen at all but the depth of PF's stuff is on another level.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88058 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 10:07 am to
While I respect what Floyd did, and like the sound of a lot of it, I seem to never finish out their songs. No idea why.

Queen.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85592 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Message Posted by dukke v QUEEN.Having the GREATEST leadman ever has its perks.

He was the greatest frontman indeed...but I much prefer Floyd.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
173841 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 11:06 am to
pink floyd
Posted by NoGumps
Member since Jan 2009
247 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 1:30 pm to
About the 16:00-19:00min mark of "Echoes" provides the answer. Queen is the bomb, but classic era Floyd essentially defined two influential genres of music: Psychedelic Rock and Prog Rock.
Posted by crews12
SELA
Member since Feb 2008
1770 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 2:43 pm to
Pink Floyd
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 2:54 pm to
Mercury was an outstanding frontman, sure. Their music is fun, classic rock. Pink Floyd however, is a journey. It takes you all sorts of places, makes you feel all sorts of emotions. David Gilmour has created some of the most incredible guitar work of all time, I'd actually put Comfortably Numb as the greatest solo on an album I've ever heard (Live versions are even more incredible). Some of the most tasteful playing there is.


I love Queen and Mercury, but this isn't even close for me; There is just much more to Pink Floyd.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

but I can't imagine anyone thinking they are even close to a band like Pink Floyd.



Comparing apples to okra IMO.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216685 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Mercury was an outstanding frontman, sure. Their music is fun, classic rock. Pink Floyd however, is a journey. It takes you all sorts of places, makes you feel all sorts of emotions. David Gilmour has created some of the most incredible guitar work of all time, I'd actually put Comfortably Numb as the greatest solo on an album I've ever heard (Live versions are even more incredible). Some of the most tasteful playing there is.


I love Queen and Mercury, but this isn't even close for me; There is just much more to Pink Floyd.


I can respect this opinion. Floyd was WAY deeper than Queen. Its close But I still like what Queen did as a whole. JUST MY OPINION.

I will say this. I have had a great BUZZ going and then Some Floyd would put me into ANOTHER Galaxy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by HandGrenade
Member since Oct 2010
11234 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 3:08 pm to
Pink Floyd for me...but I do love me some Queen!
Posted by Matisyeezy
End of the bar, Drunk
Member since Feb 2012
16638 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 3:19 pm to
Someone said apples and okra, and that is an extremely apt analogy. I don't think anyone would find the claim that Pink Floyd was as a whole composed of more musically talented individuals contentious (again, that's as a whole, Freddy is otherworldly by himself). For me, however, I find PF's music to be too context dependent, i.e., I have to be in just the right state of mind to enjoy it. I can pop in Queen anytime and enjoy it. With that in mind, I give the nod to Queen.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29572 posts
Posted on 8/18/12 at 3:20 pm to
Floyd
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram