Started By
Message

re: WTF is wrong with Stephen King? (spoiler)

Posted on 5/4/19 at 9:48 pm to
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Ever get a chance, read “The Long Walk”. It’s awesome. I think it’s in the same book as Shawshank (both short stories)
The Long Walk was not in the same book as Shawshank. The Long Walk was written under his pseudonym.

However, Shawshank was in the same book as The Body (Stand By Me).
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 10:00 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33187 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:28 pm to
Well shite, i thought Steven King was dead
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

I mean this was a deeply disturbing flick on so many levels


That is the entire point of far. Look what it was able to do to you.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:36 pm to
Gerald's Game and Dolores Claiborne combined are 658 pages.

The original release of The Stand is 823 pages.

The complete and uncut edition of The Stand is 1152 pages.

It is 1138 pages.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
20461 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:38 pm to
King is very liberal. And very much a bleeding heart. And a rampant drug user in the past. He openly admits that he bombards readers with emotions. And what are some ways to get readers to be very emotional.....

King does it with racism as well. If you listen to the Stephen King Cast, one of the main issues the podcaster has throughout King’s work is he will often make bad guys racist just to make us dislike them even more. It’s manipulative.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

I stopped reading King around then because it seemed like a sellout to sell more books--two thin books instead of an It or The Stand sized work.

King released his first book (Carrie) in 1974. Gerald's Game and Dolores Claiborne were released in 1992. His latest book was released in 2018 (The Outsider).

The complete edition of The Stand and It are his 2 longest books, but his next 8 longest books have all been released after 1992 (Under the Dome, 11/22/63, The Dark Tower VII, The Dark Tower IV, Insomnia, The Dark Tower V, Desperation, and Sleeping Beauties).

Needful Things (1991) and The Talisman (1984) break that streak, but then his next 4 longest books were also released after 1992 (Black House, Dreamcatcher, Duma Key, The Outsider).
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43429 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 11:02 pm to
You forgot The Tommyknockers and Salem’s Lot among a few others. But I get where you are going with that.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95517 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Stephen King is fricked up.




Are you familiar with what Mr. King has been doing for a living since a fairly early age ... at all?

He's obviously a heavily damaged, yet creative and talented, human being. It's right there on the printed page. Normal, well-adjusted people don't produce a volume of darkness like that. Period.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/4/19 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

You forgot The Tommyknockers and Salem’s Lot among a few others.
No, I didn't. Every book I listed is longer than Tommyknockers (558 pages), Salem's Lot (439 pages), etc.

The novels I listed are all 576+ pages. The book he's releasing later this year is also 576 pages.
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20072 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 1:25 am to
quote:

The Long Walk was not in the same book as Shawshank. The Long Walk was written under his pseudonym. However, Shawshank was in the same book as The Body (Stand By Me).


I knew it was one or the other
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19951 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 11:46 am to
Heard an interview with King on NPR a few years ago. Although I've never been much of a fan outside of a few of his works, I thought his observation on the craft of writing during the piece was pretty insightful.

He was asked why he was so prolific in the late 70s-early 90s and has since scaled back his published output. He said he always viewed writing as analogous to being a great hitter in baseball. When you find yourself in the zone, where it seems the whole game slows down and you're really at the top of your game, you want to get as many opportunities at bat as you possibly can - like a great hitter in his mid-20s. He came to this realization fairly early on, and realized that, like a great hitter, eventually age, complacency and wear-and-tear would set in, so he might as well take as many swings as he could while he was still in his prime, because he knew it wouldn't last forever.

He then freely admitted he was way past his prime, but he kept swinging, because he always felt he had another chance at hitting one out of the park. And that once he felt like he couldn't do it anymore he would retire.


Like I said, never much of a fan, but I found myself nodding in agreement with this analogy. The man does seem to know his craft.
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Her abuse isn't treated as a good thing or something to be emulated in the book or the movie, so what's the real issue here?


+1

The real issue is Stephen King's politics. This thread wouldn't have even been started if he were a Trump supporter, that's a fact. Some of the posters here are so transparent.
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 12:13 pm
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

He’s a nasty dirty liberal. Would not surprise me if he had some pedo fantasies. He can write a damn good story though


He has some serious TDS, and Hollypedos love their children
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2608 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

3nOut


Your signature pic
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43429 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

The real issue is Stephen King's politics. This thread wouldn't have even been started if he were a Trump supporter, that's a fact. Some of the posters here are so transparent.

You can’t be serious. lulz. What a dumbass.

If that were the case every post in this forum would have political innuendo included because everyone in Hollywood is liberal.

The real issue here is exactly as it was stated. Don’t try to be a mind-reading libtard .... y’all ALWAYS get it wrong.

Oh, and since you brought it up, why is it that 99% of the time pedos are libtards?

Nevermind. Let’s not go there since we already know the answer.

Sorry this subject hit so close to home for you.
Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3873 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

so what's the real issue here?


Right? You'd swear that King has made multiple sexual jokes about dating teenage girls, even his own daughter. Or that he joked about dating a 10 year old child when she gets a little older. Now that would truly make King a "total fricking perv".
Posted by Tom Servo
Member since Aug 2009
583 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

WTF!

quote:

WTF!

quote:

WTF is wrong with Stephen King?


This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 3:01 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43429 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 3:53 pm to
The libtard claim that this is all about politics ... got me to thinking.

Holy shite.

Roman Polanski .... pedo perv.

Woody Allen ... holy hell banged his adopted teenage daughter then married her.

I mean maybe this should be about politics now that the guy brings it up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram