- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wonder Woman 1984 Official Thread **SPOILERS**
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:44 pm to NOSTRODAMUS
Posted on 12/27/20 at 7:44 pm to NOSTRODAMUS
quote:
blatant sjw shite all throughout the movie.
bullshite.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:01 pm to Jay Are
You're right, we must not have watched the same movie. There was nothing feminist, no plot holes, no repressed rage, etc. It was just a cohesive movie that totally made sense, right?
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:11 pm to AlbertMeansWell
quote:
5.9 on Imdb
That's a start. Let's see how low it can go.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:19 pm to NOSTRODAMUS
quote:
I don't think we watched the same movie. I noticed subtle and blatant sjw shite all throughout the movie.
I had read that there was a lot of Trump-esque bashing in here and some woke stuff so i looked for it. I didn't find anything glaringly bad, sure there was something here or there but nothing out of the norm. Like the attempted rapist on Barbara, never seen anyone do that much less twice to the same woman. Seemed like it was there as a "men bad" thing but nothing heinously egregious.
I actually agree with Fewer that this was just a mediocre movie. I would give it a 6/10 probably. It had enough mindless fun, hot female lead and decent enough chemistry between stars to get it there. There was enough bad that had it not been for Gadot as the lead, it would have been a 4 or 5 at best.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:19 pm to Oates Mustache
Should be around 4.6 range, based on a 10 scale. Not super, just below average.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:26 pm to Dr RC
quote:I guess there's a difference between what's likely, and what's completely set in stone.
It so very rare that any movie kills the hero that I have no idea why people get bothered about it when it comes to comic movies.
And really, if you're going to give us an ongoing character, then just go ahead and give us the latest adventure. Keep things building and going forward.
This does nothing to advance the storyline.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:34 pm to TheeRealCarolina
I just watched it. Very diverse movie, very moving. I was in tears at the end. I gripped my Starbucks coffee, cried into my turtleneck and was so emotional I had to use my soothing rocks and scents to help align me.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:36 pm to TheeRealCarolina
Some of y’all are overthinking this movie. It’s just bad and makes no sense. Really bad.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:36 pm to jmarto1
quote:
There was nothing feminist, no plot holes, no repressed rage, etc. It was just a cohesive movie that totally made sense, right?
No, shithead. How many times do I have to agree that the movie is bad? There are tons of holes. The 80s pastiche doesn't match the tone of the performances. It's an hour too long. There's a lack of exposition to make it clear exactly what's happening, but any exposition would have made it more clear just how stupid the maguffin actually was. Wiig's villain is underdeveloped, and her cheetah cgi is a disaster. Lord's logic is murky at best, and it's never totally clear what his powers really are. The Steve part of this is underexplored but totally predictable from minute 1 (which wasn't until minute 46!). Ending the movie with 20 minutes of underlit action climax is the same stupid decision too many dceu movies keep making. Also, action - where the hell was it? I just think this movie is bad for reasons that are actually in the movie.
But, again, the repressed rage comes mainly from a nonwhite person. Wiig's isn't repressed, it's not really rage anyway, and her character is a stock 80s nerd stereotype who doesn't think confidence is a possibility until she wishes to be Diana. This is straight out of an 80s movie. Female power has been baked into wonder woman since 1942. Not sure what your were expecting when going to see a movie about a female superhero,as very few female superheroes aren't powerful... That said, there's no "feminism" on display when one woman turns into a literal monster to warn away from bettering herself, and the other woman gives an entire monologue on the power of love and truth, the effect of which is keeping everybody from changing the status quo of society. Because changing the status quo equals chaos. What exactly was feminist?
I keep providing examples of why the movie isn't what you say it is, even if it is bad. You keep saying nothing. Want to stop sounding retarded, and actually explain what you're talking about? Not positive the latter would bring about the former, but you could at least try.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 9:49 pm to Jay Are
I'm going to need you to do it 5 more times...at least
Posted on 12/27/20 at 10:15 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
At least we can finally get over the bullshite about Max Lord being a Trump avatar in this film. He couldn't have been further from Trump (present day or 80's).
If anything he was a goofy Christopher Reeve villain, closer to Luthor or the Luthor knockoff they used in III.
You God damned anti-Trump cocksuckers pollute everything everywhere with your horse shite.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 10:17 pm to Jay Are
I actually think this movie was reverse feminist or reverse pro female.
It was like if James Cameron or Spielberg etc made this..it would be trashed by women more than it is now.
-the female villain is the stupid dorky girl who wants good male attention so bad, she will let the world burn to keep it.
-the female hero is depressed over a guy from 60 years ago so much she hasnt dated since then lol. Literally sits at restaurants alone, only knew the guy a month.
She cant do anything without him..couldve learned to fly a plane herself but no..has to let a man from 1918 fly a jet that didnt exist in 1918. Needs him to help her fight regular soldiers when in other films she demolished soldiers and monsters.
I could go on...everything in this Wonder Woman revolves around men and a woman wrote and directed it smdh
This seemed like a Michael Bay film with Megan Fox as WW
It was like if James Cameron or Spielberg etc made this..it would be trashed by women more than it is now.
-the female villain is the stupid dorky girl who wants good male attention so bad, she will let the world burn to keep it.
-the female hero is depressed over a guy from 60 years ago so much she hasnt dated since then lol. Literally sits at restaurants alone, only knew the guy a month.
She cant do anything without him..couldve learned to fly a plane herself but no..has to let a man from 1918 fly a jet that didnt exist in 1918. Needs him to help her fight regular soldiers when in other films she demolished soldiers and monsters.
I could go on...everything in this Wonder Woman revolves around men and a woman wrote and directed it smdh
This seemed like a Michael Bay film with Megan Fox as WW
Posted on 12/27/20 at 10:19 pm to gthog61
As soon as Captain Kirk came back I wondered how they are going to kill him back off.
not terribly suspenseful
WHat plane was that and did it really have a range of 5000+ nautical miles?
not terribly suspenseful
WHat plane was that and did it really have a range of 5000+ nautical miles?
Posted on 12/27/20 at 10:31 pm to gthog61
quote:
WHat plane was that and did it really have a range of 5000+ nautical miles?
The kind needed for the movie so the story could be told.
Funny. Stuff like this in a big budget move. Flat out Sharknado level garbage.
Posted on 12/27/20 at 11:19 pm to AURaptor
This movie reminded me of The Riddler’s dastardly plan in Batman Forever
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:35 am to stateofplay
It's funny, they tried so hard to placate every single group and ideology and by doing so went so far left that they circled back around to cultural insensitivity in just about every way possible. 
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:57 am to Jay Are
Maybe I’m wrong but I didn’t get a SJW vibe from the movie at all, just a badly written mess with crap CGI and good actors wasted.
Posted on 12/28/20 at 7:28 am to Audioman213
this movie was just bad. and nearly 3 hrs long! Best part of the whole thing was the nod to the original WW at the end.
although i found Wiig kind of sexy as a cheetah.
Also, first time in a movie theater since the lockdowns started.
The Karens were on the prowl. We bought 5 seats together as a family. Karen, sitting alone a few rows up with her mask on had the usher come and ask for our tix and want to know why we had 5 people sitting so close together.
although i found Wiig kind of sexy as a cheetah.
Also, first time in a movie theater since the lockdowns started.
The Karens were on the prowl. We bought 5 seats together as a family. Karen, sitting alone a few rows up with her mask on had the usher come and ask for our tix and want to know why we had 5 people sitting so close together.
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 7:33 am
Posted on 12/28/20 at 7:56 am to MorbidTheClown
quote:
although i found Wiig kind of sexy as a cheetah
I get it. I think she's attractive, with a nice body. But up against a Gal Gadot, Kristen Wiig will always look 'average', at best.
Some criticize the cat costume. Not sure how they were supposed to pull that off w/ out being compared to the movie version of CATS.
Popular
Back to top



1








