- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What is the best movie review website?
Posted on 1/30/11 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 1/30/11 at 8:59 pm
I usually use rotten tomatoes and yahoo review any other good ones you recommend, or which you think is best
Posted on 1/30/11 at 9:13 pm to Rebels1234
imdb user reviews. its pretty easy to decipher good critics from bad and its coming from movie viewers like you and me
Posted on 1/30/11 at 9:18 pm to BlacknGold
Metacritic is the one I always check first if it's a movie I haven't really been following or aware of. IMDB user reviews are also normally pretty good.
Posted on 1/30/11 at 9:20 pm to Beaux
movies.com
Seriously, Dave White is a pretty fun writer and he comes off as a genuine film lover and not a douche nozzle
Seriously, Dave White is a pretty fun writer and he comes off as a genuine film lover and not a douche nozzle
Posted on 1/30/11 at 9:27 pm to Beaux
The movie/tv board on td.com.
Pretty much everyone starts their reviews with something like "simply a fantastic film!!!" so they have to know what they are talking about
But they will probably hate you for saying movie instead of film, so GFYM in advance.
Pretty much everyone starts their reviews with something like "simply a fantastic film!!!" so they have to know what they are talking about
But they will probably hate you for saying movie instead of film, so GFYM in advance.
Posted on 1/30/11 at 9:42 pm to Beaux
quote:
What is the best movie review website?
I check out rottentomatoes every day, but as far as the best critic out there, it's James Berardinelli of reelviews.net.
Posted on 1/30/11 at 10:31 pm to Superior Pariah
quote:
movies.com
Seriously, Dave White is a pretty fun writer and he comes off as a genuine film lover and not a douche nozzle
My favorite as well.
They got a chick on there reviewing now too. Haven't read any of her stuff yet though.
Posted on 1/30/11 at 10:52 pm to TheHumanTornado
There is no better movie reviewer than Armond White. There are not enough superlatives in the English language to describe the man, they myth, the legend that is Armond White.
His review of Transformers II changed my life and made me the man I am today. If only more people had read this review perhaps world peace would be within our grasp.
One can only hope the leaders of all nations breathe in his review of G.I. Joe II when the movie is released.
His review of Transformers II changed my life and made me the man I am today. If only more people had read this review perhaps world peace would be within our grasp.
One can only hope the leaders of all nations breathe in his review of G.I. Joe II when the movie is released.
This post was edited on 1/30/11 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 1/30/11 at 11:05 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
Armond White
His schtick is so tired, and so obviously an act. He knows hot to get a shite ton of hits on his reviews, and milks it for all it's worth.
Posted on 1/31/11 at 9:09 am to DanglingFury
As an aggregator, I go with metacritic. For an individual reviewer, I tend to go with the AV Club.
For analysis, I like Ebert and O'Hehir.
For analysis, I like Ebert and O'Hehir.
Posted on 1/31/11 at 9:29 am to Baloo
Posted on 1/31/11 at 10:02 am to Billy Mays
MRQE
better than RT because any movie that's 'good' will get a fresh rating, meaning that if you get an 75% movie than that means it could be really good or just 'a handful of redeeming qualities.' but I do love the consensus summaries
metacritic is a little too reductive and minimalist in its effort to report on a movie's quality.
I like MRQE because it reveals the gradient of scores and usually collects more reviews than metacritic does. the only thing I wish it has was RTs consensus descriptions
better than RT because any movie that's 'good' will get a fresh rating, meaning that if you get an 75% movie than that means it could be really good or just 'a handful of redeeming qualities.' but I do love the consensus summaries
metacritic is a little too reductive and minimalist in its effort to report on a movie's quality.
I like MRQE because it reveals the gradient of scores and usually collects more reviews than metacritic does. the only thing I wish it has was RTs consensus descriptions
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News