- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vikings history channel
Posted on 4/8/13 at 7:05 pm to Joshy_squashy
Posted on 4/8/13 at 7:05 pm to Joshy_squashy
Just saw the one on one. fricking AWESOME.
ETA: show should have been on HBO, though.
ETA: show should have been on HBO, though.
This post was edited on 4/8/13 at 7:12 pm
3
Posted on 4/8/13 at 7:36 pm to SEClint
i would rather see a real person surrounded by real non poisonous snakes than some CGI generated poisonous snakes, but thats just me.
hell they're still carnivores and can constrict you.
hell they're still carnivores and can constrict you.
Posted on 4/8/13 at 10:31 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
ETA: show should have been on HBO, though.
True, but this is true for 99% of shows.
Viking= awesome Vikings+tits= EVEN MORE AWESOME
Mad Men = Awesome Mad Men+Tits= EVEN MORE AWESOME
Of course i think every actress in mad men is hotter than 90% of actresses on HBO because they don't have to show their tits.
Posted on 4/8/13 at 10:40 pm to YumYum Sauce
..could have been shot differently old schooled with real venomous snakes. with glass to separate.
Like in Raiders of the lost Ark.
or shot with the real venomous snakes without the actor, after that have the actual actor filmed in the empty pit, then merge the two. The snakes dont have to be cgi. editing film has come a long way.
Like in Raiders of the lost Ark.
or shot with the real venomous snakes without the actor, after that have the actual actor filmed in the empty pit, then merge the two. The snakes dont have to be cgi. editing film has come a long way.
Posted on 4/8/13 at 11:35 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
I hated that bald POS more so than the Lord.
Posted on 4/8/13 at 11:36 pm to Joshy_squashy
quote:
Anyone on OT fan of this show?
Ahistorical garbage.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 1:05 am to LoveThatMoney
I'm marathoning the last three right now. About to have the one on one with the Earl. Just stopped it for some posting and to grab a drink.
Just saw I have work in seven hours, but who needs sleep when there is vikings.
Just saw I have work in seven hours, but who needs sleep when there is vikings.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:42 am to Coon
quote:
you gota admit, though... the old man she was married to hit it like a boss.
busts a nut, proclaims he just made a kid, tells wife to get sandwich...
frick yesss
Posted on 4/9/13 at 6:33 am to Coon
quote:
you gota admit, though... the old man she was married to hit it like a boss.
busts a nut, proclaims he just made a kid, tells wife to get sandwich...
...then threatened to beat her if she didnt
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:08 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:
Just saw the one on one. fricking AWESOME.
It was awesome, I was very surprised by the outcome.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:12 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
Ahistorical garbage.
I doubt many of us are watching this show for a history lesson
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:43 pm to YumYum Sauce
One thing that gave me pause about the fight was that after Ragnar's sword broke, they kept fighting for awhile. Then they stopped, the Earl threw down his sword and they both got axes. That seems like a hell of an advantage for the Earl to give up voluntarily.
From what I remember, the rules stated at the beginning of the fight said only two shields per person. But I don't remember them saying you had to switch from sword to axe and let you opponent re-arm.
Did anyone else catch anything about that in the rules?
From what I remember, the rules stated at the beginning of the fight said only two shields per person. But I don't remember them saying you had to switch from sword to axe and let you opponent re-arm.
Did anyone else catch anything about that in the rules?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:45 pm to NIH
quote:
I hated that bald POS more so than the Lord.
yes, I liked how he got it.
Hail Ragnar.
I can't wait to see the next one. I watched the last three episodes last night. Bravo History Channel. This show has very good production.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 5:34 pm to Methuselah
Well, the Earl is not without honor. It would have been a tainted victory if he beat an unarmed man. It was an honor duel. If he had simply killed Ragnar, he would have lost status among the clan.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 7:18 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
Well, the Earl is not without honor. It would have been a tainted victory if he beat an unarmed man. It was an honor duel. If he had simply killed Ragnar, he would have lost status among the clan.
Sure, but if the man is unarmed as a result of the fight itself, that would seem to be the entire point of the battle.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News