- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:13 pm to Roaad
Taylor Swift
Ariana Grande
Zendaya
All different body types lol
Ariana Grande
Zendaya
All different body types lol
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:14 pm to Roaad
Your definition of curvy isn’t real. A fat arse doesn’t mean curvy just because you think it can win you an argument that wasn’t meant to be an argument.
Again, child like
Again, child like
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:15 pm to Roaad
If you think models are “stick figures” it’s because you’ve never seen one up close
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:16 pm to Madking
quote:2 of them are practically identical
Taylor Swift
Ariana Grande
Zendaya
1 is a shorter version with an almost identical silhoutte
You are floundering
You can mald out over the fact you you like little boy bodies. . .it is your thing
I am not going to argue with your contention that little boy bodies are attractive
Enjoy!
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:17 pm to Madking
quote:Curvy Hips and fat arse aren't the same thi. . .
A fat arse doesn’t mean curvy
you know what, mald out son
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:21 pm to Roaad
quote:
2 of them are practically identical
Wrong
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:22 pm to Roaad
quote:
Pugh has a better figure, Zendaya has a pretty face
Florence Pugh does not have a better figure. Shorter, rounder, thick in the belly, wider in the shoulders and hips. Two very different body types, only one of these girls is built to model.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:23 pm to Roaad
quote:
mald out son
Projection, you can’t help but hit the emojis and give yourself away.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:24 pm to Saint Alfonzo
Models are stick figures, Roseanne is hot
That’s what we’re dealing with here
That’s what we’re dealing with here
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:26 pm to Madking
quote:
Models are stick figures, Roxanne is hot
Who is Roxanne? Does she have to put on the red light?
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:28 pm to Saint Alfonzo
She doesn’t have to wear that dress tonight. It doesn’t fit anyway
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:52 pm to Roaad
Not much of a body, but she's not ugly.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 7:46 pm to DomincDecoco
quote:this isn't new. Reagan did it in the '80s.
why do progressives insist on using the word "folks" as in "white folks and black folks"
seems like theyre trying to be hip to ol time gospel preachers.....sounds horrific and I can immediately tell the slant of an article/tweet/comment if I see that term
It's a device to sound more folksy (sorry) or just folks (sorry again). Very valuable for politicians.
It's especially annoying/amusing to hear Ivy League feminists or Bernie Sanders types saying it.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 8:05 pm to Kafka
it's all good kin folk
Posted on 5/14/26 at 9:47 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
I like Zendaya's face and figure. She's tall, slim, and leggy. Imagine having these wrapped around you like Spider Woman
I sometimes find her very attractive and sometimes find her funny looking. Seinfeld accurately described that as two faced.
I think Emma Stone is a very similar type of appeal in a different shade. She is thin and generally attractive but sort of funny looking at times. Neither actress has much in the way of curves on the chest or butt.
And as a sidebar the phrase "objectively attractive" strikes me as a partial oxymoron. There are features such as facial symmetry and hip to waist ratio that can be measured and may fit the standards for objective beauty but an unappealing personality or out group membership disliked by the individual may override beauty and make a beautiful person unattractive.
For Helen of Troy presumably she needed to be both beautiful and considered exceptionally attractive. If they feature Apollo a casting choice that doesn't land on a beautiful man would also be a failure.
Agree with comments earlier that noted preferences don't equate with a bias against in other ways. Presumably most people agree heterosexual men are not misandrists because they don't want to have sex with other men. A certain amount of in-group mating preference is believed to be a common strategy to pass on a larger percentage of your genes while not risking recessive phenotypes associated with inbreeding.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:49 am to molsusports
Zendaya has a pretty face. She has the figure of an anorexic child
Emma Stone has a bit better figure, but is unattractive from the neck up. She just looks greasy to me. Like a female version of Norman Reedus.
Neither have anything resembling tits or arse. Skinny, rather than thin.
Emma Stone has a bit better figure, but is unattractive from the neck up. She just looks greasy to me. Like a female version of Norman Reedus.
Neither have anything resembling tits or arse. Skinny, rather than thin.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 7:51 am
Posted on 5/15/26 at 7:57 am to hawgfaninc
This movie is going to be absolute dog shite if articles like this are already dropping 2 months out Disney is notorious for these types of articles lately
Disney is notorious for these types of articles lately 
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:15 am to UnluckyTiger
quote:
Disney is notorious for these types of articles lately
Disney is also notorious for the WTH Casting Department shite.
There is a reason that South Park lampooned Kathleen Kennedy with the whole “Add a woman and make it lame” bit.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 8:26 am to teke184
Yep that was my point. The casting coupled with the dialogue in the trailer is
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News