- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Variety: Online onslaught against the diverse cast of “The Odyssey.”
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:29 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:29 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
e first two sucked. The only reason people think they are good is because the sequels came out and sucked even harder so people think "You know the prequels actually weren't that bad."
the first one wasn't good but gave us both Qui-Gon Jinn and Maul who are iconic
the second was good enough and gave us the clone army/clankers, action yoda, and Dooku. again, iconic.
all of these characters are huge for the television series and the excellent Battlefront 2 game.
gen x doesn't like the prequels but who cares what they think
2
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:38 pm to Proximo
quote:
the first one wasn't good but gave us both Qui-Gon Jinn and Maul who are iconic
the second was good enough and gave us the clone army/clankers, action yoda, and Dooku. again, iconic.
Simply giving you characters on screen does not make it good.
The Hobbit movies gave us Thorin, Smaug, Radagast, and Beorn. Simply having those characters in the movies doesn't make them good (though they are better than the SW prequels outside of ROTS). I'd probably argue too that Jar Jar, Anakin, and a few others offset any good.
quote:
all of these characters are huge for the television series and the excellent Battlefront 2 game.
Could they not have used those characters if the prequels didn't exist? Also doesn't have any relation to whether or not the prequels were good movies.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:40 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
does not make it good.
A new hope is not very good but gives us Vader, Luke/Leia and Chewy
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:45 pm to StrongOffer
He doesn’t want me to go see it. So I won’t.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:48 pm to Proximo
quote:
A new hope is not very good
lol you guys have jumped the shark with the Disney cope
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:50 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
In the face, they’re completely different. And that’s the game-changer.
Well, that's a beauty is in the eye of the beholder sorta thing. My preference would be Zendaya. In a blonde vs. blonde scenario, I would prefer Margot Robbie or even Sydney Sweeney. The real game-changer is personality. Zendaya seems like a down to Earth, fun-loving and loyal wifey type of chick and Charlize is a crazy liberal count with a bad attitude, a promiscuous streak and two adopted black boys she turned trans.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:53 pm to Madking
It’s just not really rewatchable because of the effects, I feel similarly about the first Terminator. It’s great but I dont ever reach for my 4k copy of it
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 3:56 pm to Proximo
What would you consider an older movie that’s good because the effects hold up?
Posted on 5/14/26 at 4:01 pm to Madking
quote:
What would you consider an older movie that’s good because the effects hold up?
Alien is very rewatchable because you don’t see the rubber suit most of the film and it’s mostly horror/suspense.
The tunnel scene where he spreads his arms out and the scene outside the escape pod do look goofy, however
Posted on 5/14/26 at 4:48 pm to BeefSupreme
Posted on 5/14/26 at 4:55 pm to Proximo
More makeup and costume than effects.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:23 pm to Madking
quote:Having a feminine figure does not mean busty
Not by your standards, she’s not busty so she looks like a boy is what you just said.
Pugh has curves, Zendaya is a stick figure
Pugh has the same measurements as Zendaya, but she is 7 inches shorter
Smaller frame exaggerates measurements
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:27 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Her and Charlize Theron are basically the same woman.
quote:Is quite a different figure than
34-25-34
quote:
36-24-36
Like waaaaay different
Crazy that you thought it wasn't man
Like wtf?
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:51 pm to Roaad
quote:
Like waaaaay different
Crazy that you thought it wasn't man
Like wtf?
Same height and weight, which you left out. They're both tall, slim, leggy model types. Both are a B cup and I'm not gonna quibble with you over breasts and hips. In modeling circles, they're both known to have the "flamboyant natural" body type.
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:58 pm to BugAC
quote:
Are they broadcasting failure before the release? Truly uncharted territory especially when it comes to injected wokeness in movies.
The media is definitely campaigning to help him. There's a massive psyop going on at Time, CNN, etc, to convince us that the piss washing over our boots is really just rain.
But nothing they say will fix things or save this abomination. A guy on YouTube summed it up pretty well:
"We were supposed to get Helen of Troy. We got Helen of Detroit."
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:59 pm to Roaad
Like I said to start, if you don’t get it then you just don’t get it. One has a boxy shape with a wider bottom. To you that’s “curves” the other one doesn’t have but in reality she does. She has a better gate, she has a sway back, a cupped bottom and curvier legs. She has more curves and a much better figure. This is why models are the most attractive females on the planet and female power lifters aren’t.
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:01 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:Same height works against your argument
Same height and weight,
Weight is irrelevant to figure, given the same height and those measurements
Zendaya has an inch larger waist, 2 inch smaller chest and hips
Those are significantly different
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:06 pm to Madking
Pugh has a better figure, Zendaya has a pretty face
If what you are needing me to "get" is just me saying basic understanding of figures is wrong because you just need it to be. . .then I am probably never going to get it, because I am just not attracted to figures more common to little boys
Same reason I don't find Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande attractive
Stick figures are not attractive
Pugh and Zendaya have the same bra size. . , but a 32B is much larger on a 5'3 frame than a 5'10 frame
And I seriously doubt Zendaya has a B-cup. Chick is probably still sporting a trainer
If what you are needing me to "get" is just me saying basic understanding of figures is wrong because you just need it to be. . .then I am probably never going to get it, because I am just not attracted to figures more common to little boys
Same reason I don't find Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande attractive
Stick figures are not attractive
Pugh and Zendaya have the same bra size. . , but a 32B is much larger on a 5'3 frame than a 5'10 frame
And I seriously doubt Zendaya has a B-cup. Chick is probably still sporting a trainer
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:11 pm to Roaad
You have a little boys view of women
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News