- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Think you can act as good as Zendaya?
Posted on 8/9/26 at 6:02 pm to RobbBobb
Posted on 8/9/26 at 6:02 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
I just dont get the love. Most of her box office success was from films where shes part of the ensemble cast. When shes the focus, the numbers just arent there
She's the second lead on the last two Spider-Man movies. They've both done really well with her billed at the top.
3
Posted on 8/9/26 at 9:09 pm to Saint Alfonzo
Some of it has to do with the fact that she is professionally referred to by her first name only instead of Zendaya Coleman. Lends a certain pretentiousness to a mid-level actress being billed as an all-timer. A lot of people see through that and how she has been manufactured as a star. All-timers are usually referred to by last name or full name. Marlon Brando wasn’t billed as Marlon. John Wayne wasn’t billed as John. If anything, last names were most common for all timers if they were unique and rolled off the tongue. McQueen, Pacino, Cruise, Gable, DeNiro, etc.. Jimmy Stewart wasn’t Jimmy or Stewart in billings. To common and not unique so he got the full name billing. Zendaya Coleman was just annointed Zendaya as if she was some A Lister way to early. It’s just kind of fake and I think many people hold that against her.
Posted on 8/9/26 at 9:26 pm to Dirk Dawgler
quote:
Some of it has to do with the fact that she is professionally referred to by her first name only instead of Zendaya Coleman. Lends a certain pretentiousness to a mid-level actress being billed as an all-timer. A lot of people see through that and how she has been manufactured as a star. All-timers are usually referred to by last name or full name. Marlon Brando wasn’t billed as Marlon. John Wayne wasn’t billed as John. If anything, last names were most common for all timers if they were unique and rolled off the tongue. McQueen, Pacino, Cruise, Gable, DeNiro, etc.. Jimmy Stewart wasn’t Jimmy or Stewart in billings. To common and not unique so he got the full name billing. Zendaya Coleman was just annointed Zendaya as if she was some A Lister way to early. It’s just kind of fake and I think many people hold that against her.
She's called Zendaya because she thought it sounded cool as just the one word moniker. It's not some industry conspiracy, she goes by that screen name because it's literally her name. Does she need to use her last name for you to figure out who she is? Were you confusing her with the other Zendaya?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 9:53 am to Saint Alfonzo
She has grown on me in the Spider Man francbise but she is like Common for me where I don't see the motivation to cast her
Posted on 8/10/26 at 10:02 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
She's called Zendaya because she thought it sounded cool as just the one word moniker. It's not some industry conspiracy, she goes by that screen name because it's literally her name
Can’t blame her for running with it if that’s what most people recognize her as. And as you said, it’s her name so it’s not like she is some poser
Posted on 8/10/26 at 10:07 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
She's the second lead on the last two Spider-Man movies. They've both done really well with her billed at the top.
I really hope this was a joke. It's Spider-Man! Krypto could be second billing and it would have made a ton.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 10:22 am to Dirk Dawgler
What an insufferable twat.
You, not her.
You, not her.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 10:26 am to jmarto1
quote:
where I don't see the motivation to cast her
Whether people her like her or not, she is massively popular. The Drama and Challengers are making single digit millions without her. Or they're straight to streaming. I understand it's hard to credit her for the success of Spider-Man, but she's a proven boost to box office.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 10:43 am to RobbBobb
quote:
I just dont get the love. Most of her box office success was from films where shes part of the ensemble cast. When shes the focus, the numbers just arent there
There are virtually no actresses that bring people to the box office. I don't think anyone has ever made an argument.
quote:
Challengers - $50,119,408
The Drama - $48,062,006
Malcolm & Marie - $2,000,000
None of these umbers are accurate.
Challengers brought in 98 million, The Drama 105 million (on a 28 million budget), and Malcom and Marie was a 2.5 million black and white micro budget film for netflix that wasn't even in theatres.
quote:
She simply didnt drive the box office for Spidey, Greatest Showman, Odyssey or Dune.
Nobody is saying she does.
What actresses do you know today that are causing people to flock to see their movies?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:35 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:Riley Reid
What actresses do you know today that are causing people to flock to see their movies?
Wait, what are we talking about again?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News