- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"The Affair" on Showtime.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:30 pm
Halfway in and so far it's pretty good.
8
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:28 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Watching it now
Pretty good so far
Pretty good so far
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:53 pm to AlbertMeansWell
Very interesting.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:58 pm to AlbertMeansWell
This does have potential.
Dominic West is always good.
And I've been panting after Ruth Wilson ever since she heated things up in Luther.
Dominic West is always good.
And I've been panting after Ruth Wilson ever since she heated things up in Luther.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:05 pm to Walt OReilly
What is the overall premise besides the obvious affair? Have it recorded.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:06 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
What is the overall premise besides the obvious affair? Have it recorded.
Someone is dead. Investigation and flashbacks from two different points of view.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:29 am to VOR
Good enough of a first episode for me to keep watching, but I wasn't blown away.
The wife is the easy guess, but the interviewer asked West's character how life was back then and he said "my kids were healthy", so I think something may happen to one of them.
quote:
Someone is dead.
The wife is the easy guess, but the interviewer asked West's character how life was back then and he said "my kids were healthy", so I think something may happen to one of them.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:11 am to AlbertMeansWell
First episode had me intrigued. Gonna watch a few more but show had promise.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:52 am to AlbertMeansWell
McNaulty? Peter Bishop?
Sign me up for this pain train.
Sign me up for this pain train.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:03 am to AlbertMeansWell
I liked it. Will keep watching.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 12:30 pm to Pettifogger
I like how they showed to perspectives and the subtle differences in both accounts.
I also like how in both accounts she was taking it from behind with a smile.
I also like how in both accounts she was taking it from behind with a smile.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 1:18 pm to AlbertMeansWell
I started watching this on Sunday, but was in and out of the house so I missed most of it. I started watching again last night and thought I lost my mind. I didn't realize it was 2 different accounts of the story. 
I did enjoy the premier, and will keep watching.
One thing. On the initial story telling during the childs choke scene, I thought I noticed the waitress pick up the choking obstruction and place it in her apron. It appeared she looked at the item and then hid it quickly. Did anyone notice this or am I seeing things?
I did enjoy the premier, and will keep watching.
One thing. On the initial story telling during the childs choke scene, I thought I noticed the waitress pick up the choking obstruction and place it in her apron. It appeared she looked at the item and then hid it quickly. Did anyone notice this or am I seeing things?
Posted on 10/14/14 at 2:09 pm to Oenophile Brah
quote:
One thing. On the initial story telling during the childs choke scene, I thought I noticed the waitress pick up the choking obstruction and place it in her apron. It appeared she looked at the item and then hid it quickly. Did anyone notice this or am I seeing things?
I saw that too. Not sure what to make of it because it didn't happen when she told her side. Not even sure what it was. A candy?
Posted on 10/14/14 at 2:38 pm to suavecito80
quote:
Not sure what to make of it because it didn't happen when she told her side. Not even sure what it was. A candy?
My initial thought was it was his wedding ring, but that couldn't be it. May try to see if I can catch it on replay.
Posted on 10/15/14 at 2:30 pm to Oenophile Brah
quote:
My initial thought was it was his wedding ring, but that couldn't be it. May try to see if I can catch it on replay.
Watched last night. It looked like a marble or something. Cant wait for second episode
Posted on 10/15/14 at 2:32 pm to Gamecox20
First episode was really solid. Looking forward to the rest of the season.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:52 pm to tylercsbn9
Losing interest. Last night's episode was boring as frick. Replace the two leads with actors I don't particularly like, and I would be done with it.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 11:42 am to THRILLHO
I'm still pretty interested, but last night's episode didn't advance much other than giving us a few more details about her son.
Spoiler:
I did think the differences relating to the detective (happily married vs. divorced) were particularly interesting. Could just be an account difference, but could it also represent a time difference for the investigation?
Spoiler:
I did think the differences relating to the detective (happily married vs. divorced) were particularly interesting. Could just be an account difference, but could it also represent a time difference for the investigation?
This post was edited on 11/4/14 at 11:44 am
Posted on 11/4/14 at 12:20 pm to Pettifogger
I think it's pretty good. I do think they have to build a story up and the whole episode dedicated to the affair starting and taking place had to be done but they could have shortened it and added more meat. Hopefully, this is the only bore the shite out of you with boring details episodes.
Posted on 11/4/14 at 12:55 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I did think the differences relating to the detective (happily married vs. divorced) were particularly interesting. Could just be an account difference, but could it also represent a time difference for the investigation?
Whenever the detective is in the show, I assume it is at the current time and is not being retold by either of them. I don't think him telling them two different things was because they each recall it differently, I think he actually said two different things to them. I think he said he different things to each of them because he thought that is what each would want to hear from someone they would open up to
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News