Started By
Message

re: "Tenet" Official SPOILERS Thread

Posted on 9/8/20 at 11:26 am to
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 9/8/20 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Like why is there a time machine in the Oslo airport? I don't get the art connections to the overall story either.


It was in the Freeport, which in the film appeared to be a maritime port with an adjacent airport. And that was the part of the Freeport owned by Sator, which is where he was hiding one of the inversion machines used to duplicate his gold.

The fake Goya painting is how Sator controls and imprisons his wife. She unknowingly sold him a fake painting worth about $9 million. Sator knew, she didn't. If he turned her in, she would be prosecuted, wind up in jail, lose her son, job, etc. Instead, he holds it over her and controls her life. She's essentially a prisoner.

quote:

I don't see why she's so confident that's where/when he'd go to destroy the world. Might have had enough of that bitch and wanted to be elsewhere in a different time in his life.


It's just an assumption that's needed to make the movie work. The same as Coop hoping that Murph will uncover the truth about gravity by somehow focusing on the watch "because of love". Or Cobb and the crew planning an intricately complex covert op without figuring out how they're going to get Fischer alone for 11 hours, only for Saito to resolve it by saying he bought the airline.

It's also important to remember that inverting yourself to travel back to some point in the past involves living those days in full again. So it's not like one can invert themselves and then quickly and easily go back and relive their childhood or something. You still age normally while inverted, and time passes at the same rate (-1 second per second). So given those restrictions, it seemed reasonable to Kat that he would go back to the most recent time in which he felt the happiest.


quote:

There's no way he doesn't have cameras on that boat.


That seems like a really needless nitpick. Kind of like saying there's no way someone doesn't accidentally wander into the first class area in Inception. Or there's no way Bruce Wayne doesn't have a premium sprinkler system to kick on in his home in the event of a fire.
This post was edited on 9/8/20 at 12:00 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63442 posts
Posted on 9/14/20 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Better with subtitles

Yea I liked the movie. But caught myself wishing there were subtitles multiple times in the movie.
Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1403 posts
Posted on 9/14/20 at 11:12 am to
Finally got to go and see this over the weekend, and agree with a lot of the previous comments regarding the sound mixing. Felt lost for about the first 30-45 minutes of the film, but honestly ended up feeling like we were meant to learn along with JDW by the end. As the movie went on, the beginning of the movie starts to make more sense and tie everything together. It made sense why it felt like it was moving quickly, because for him it was. He was trying to put pieces together, but didn't have enough information at that point, which is where I'm assuming the audience was, too. In my opinion, knowing he used inversion to make sure the right people knew what pieces would be needed to reach the final pincer moment clarified quite a bit for me even if it was at the end.

It's definitely one that I'll want to watch again in order to better understand and appreciate all of the small pieces, but I really enjoyed it.
Posted by ClampClampington
Nebraska
Member since Jun 2017
4047 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 3:12 am to
I saw it once, then again about a week later. I actually liked the first viewing, but it's much better upon second watch. There is just too much to unpack on the first watch when you have no idea what the hell to look for.

Anyone else get the sense that Neil (Pattinson) is actually a future version of Kat's son Max that was recruited by the Protaganist and inverted several years back with knowledge to assist the current JDW? This movie still makes my brain hurt
Posted by Sgt_Lincoln_Osiris
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2014
1175 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Anyone else get the sense that Neil (Pattinson) is actually a future version of Kat's son Max that was recruited by the Protaganist and inverted several years back with knowledge to assist the current JDW?


I've seen that theory, but my thoughts as to why it's not the son is because he would have to be inverted for YEARS to be the age Neil is in the movie. Not a problem, except for the breathing issue and the fact that he would probably be arrested for driving backwards everywhere.

Wouldn't he have to carry an oxygen mask all that time?

I've been googling the need for the O2 masks and can't find the answer. I need a second viewing to hear how they explain it.

Cs, can you help me out on the masks?
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 10:31 am
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I've seen that theory, but my thoughts as to why it's not the son is because he would have to be inverted for YEARS to be the age Neil is in the movie. Not a problem, except for the breathing issue and the fact that he would probably be arrested for driving backwards everywhere.

Wouldn't he have to carry an oxygen mask all that time?

I've been googling the need for the O2 masks and can't find the answer. I need a second viewing to hear how they explain it.


It's a popular theory and I think it works in many ways.

Recall that masks are only needed if an inverted individual exposes themselves to air that is not inverted - ie, when you're out and about and walking around, the characters wear masks when inverted. This is because your bodily entropy is inverted relative to the entropy of the molecules in the air. An inverted person, from their own perspective, appears to inhale normally - for air molecules, however, they appear to be physically exhaling.

Given that your lung volume increases when inhaling, and decreases when exhaling, when you breathe out while inverted, the non-inverted air molecules are still reacting to the force you created, but instead travel into your lungs at the point in which your total lung capacity is at its lowest. This means far less oxygen is getting pumped through your body and to your organs, resulting in hypoxemia. Hence the need for masks with inverted air to properly work with your inverted bodily entropy.

But recall there were also scenes where the characters were inverted, but not wearing masks (a few of them actually) - this is because they were sequestered within a sealed room or container with their own inverted air. We saw this on the blue side of the room after JDW, Neil, and Ives all inverted themselves after Kat was shot. None of them had masks, because that was a sealed room that now contained inverted air. We also saw this on the cargo ship while they were traveling back to the Oslo Freeport to reinvert themselves. Neil, Kat, and JDW were all talking with one another in that container without masks, as it was a hermetically sealed container filled with inverted air.

So it seems reasonable to assume that a younger future Neil could have inverted himself for years without becoming too entangled with the non-inverted world. He would simply need a sealed room, or series of rooms (perhaps on a cargo ship as seen near the end of the film) in which he could live until the time came to reinvert himself to carry out his mission.
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Sgt_Lincoln_Osiris
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2014
1175 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 3:40 pm to


Thank you! (Mr. Nolan)

I definitely need a rewatch. The soundtrack has stayed on at work and although it's no Zimmer, it's just as good.
This post was edited on 9/17/20 at 3:44 pm
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 4:03 pm to
The soundtrack is definitely amazing. Certainly one of the better scores in a Nolan film. I would place it right alongside Inception.

And yes, the film becomes much better upon repeated viewings. Certain conversations, bits of dialogue, and sequences just start to make sense and gel together. You pick up on things that you were oblivious to the first time around, and the intricacy of the film starts to reveal itself in a much clearer fashion.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13533 posts
Posted on 9/17/20 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Certainly one of the better scores in a Nolan film. I would place it right alongside Inception.


I thought the score had a bit too much going on at times, but still a good one overall. Don't think its close to Interstellar and Inception though
Posted by kballa6
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
4184 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 9:24 am to
Wife and I really enjoyed it. We were both confused at times and walked away with way more questions than with any of his other movies. The audio had some issues and subtitles in a couple places would have really helped. I can't wait to see it again.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476560 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 2:02 pm to
rented this last night. couldn't even finish it.

it wasn't even because it was overly confusing just to be confusing (which actually made it make no sense), but it was just bad. you know like when stoner comedies are described as not a movie and a bunch of skits? that's Tenet. it was a collection of scenes glued together with simplistic expository dialogue uttered with wooden acting (except Neil had some decent deliveries)

Nolan was trying to have a rapid-fire Sorkin-like script which doesn't work with a massive, high concept sci fi, ESPECIALLY if you can't/won't explain it
Posted by Got Heeem
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
3631 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:43 pm to
Shitty movie. All around. Pure garbage.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram