Started By
Message

re: TED BUNDY: Netflix: Conversation with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

Posted on 1/30/19 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72012 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 2:46 pm to
He comes across as someone who trained himself to be well spoken but certainly not naturally gifted. His killings were impulsive and sloppy.

And I don't see what is so attractive about him physically. I can see another man and realize he is a good looking, well put together baw. Bundy has a fricking unibrow and a non symmetrical face. He looks off to me. I just don't see it.

I mean look at this dude.



This post was edited on 1/30/19 at 2:47 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94811 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

His killings were impulsive and sloppy.


Well, that's another problem - it's almost as if there were at least 2 different "killing" personas, too. Some were very effective. Some of the targets he stalked for weeks. Others were selected on the spur of the moment (clearly).

He had some level of control for some periods, yet he binged in Tallahassee in a regressive, impulsive way - had he exercised more control, they might not have started looking for him so quickly. Of course, stealing credit cards and cars got him caught and they would have put 2 and 2 together.

quote:

And I don't see what is so attractive about him physically.


Well, he definitely comes across better on film than in many still photos, including this one. He had a practiced charm and charisma that seemed to work on many folks. He could also turn this dark for the opposite effect.

He was a chameleon, too, by design and they did a good job of that in the Netflix show - showing how he appeared differently depending on what he did with his hair, his facial hair, his expression and even which angle one saw or photographed him from.

Generic and "good looking" (at least for the time/place) was pretty consistent from the reports of the era. It was probably more than mere photogenic good looks.

Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26563 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

I mean look at this dude.


I had not really paid attention to the way he looked until the Netflix documentary. Didn't know that much about him at all except the basics. But the documentary does show that he was generally considered a decent looking guy. I'm sure some of it was relative to the "for a deranged serial killer" but at times he did come off decent looking.










Other times of course he looked fricking crazy.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37937 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

at times he did come off decent looking.

Mark Harmon and Zac Ephron aren't exactly plain looking guys. I think there's a reason they cast attractive actors for the role instead of Steve Buscemi or Paul Giamatti.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 5:27 pm to
well you picked probably one of the worst pics of him to make your point

the guy was a good looking man
Posted by Latebloomer
Passing through
Member since Jul 2012
263 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 7:58 pm to
I grew up in Florida and was about the same age as his victims. My best friend that I’ve known since high school was living in a sorority house at FSU about 4 houses down at the time of the Chi Omega murders. Spoke to her last night and she said she would never forget that night. From then on, they went everywhere in groups.
Posted by Dawgirl
Member since Oct 2015
6365 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:05 pm to
From a woman's opinion, back in the late 70s, early 80s, yes he was good looking. But the man could go from good looking to total evil looking. For example, some of the photos posted he was good looking but when you see him being led away from the courtroom, being pissed, his look went from good looking to evil as f*uck. I remember watching the last interview he gave the night before he was executed. I was 12 and felt bad for him because he was blaming everything on porn and because I thought he was good looking. I was naive and my mom said "Dont feel bad for him because thats what he wants". So imagine those young girls who came across his path. Those girls who were groupies didn't realize if he got them in a room for 5 minutes, he would have done things to them that they would be horrified. Ted was a diabolical SOB. They got him for 4 murders but he claimed to murder over 70 women. He was an evil SOB who deserved what he got.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14683 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:27 pm to
agreed, based on the styles/trends at the time, he was a good looking guy.

remember back then everyone had longer hair, and guys were scrawnier.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 1/31/19 at 8:28 am to
Dude had a very aggressive unibrow for a long period of time.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31776 posts
Posted on 1/31/19 at 10:05 am to
Stunning to me that FL authorities had custody of a notorious serial killer on the FBI’s Most Wanted List and they couldn’t figure out who he was just because he was refusing to tell them his name.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72012 posts
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Dude had a very aggressive unibrow for a long period of time.



Yea, and a sharp arse nose and unsymmetrical face. I just don't see it. Throw a 5 o clock shadow on any non fat person and they look better.

the unibrow was around for a long time. Even in his HS pic.

I get that he was good looking compared to other serial killers. But I don't think he is compared to just dudes in general. JMO.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Stunning to me that FL authorities had custody of a notorious serial killer on the FBI’s Most Wanted List and they couldn’t figure out who he was just because he was refusing to tell them his name.


Welcome to 1978.

Most people in Florida probably didn't even know anything about Ted Bundy and what he had done out west prior to his capture.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
21044 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

but in this case they used that bull shite stuff to actually put a murderer away.

I thought this as well, but it seemed even if that didnt get him, all of the evidence they had on him with the young girl wouldve done the job... Had he still been in custody.

Ill just say, yes he was a sick frick but you gotta admit it was pretty impressive how he managed to escape custody twice.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115636 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Ill just say, yes he was a sick frick but you gotta admit it was pretty impressive how he managed to escape custody twice.


Still not impressed by someone escaping a situation when they weren’t handcuffed or supervised in the least

Pretty sure the kid from Making a murderer could’ve gotten out of that one
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
21044 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Still not impressed by someone escaping a situation when they weren’t handcuffed or supervised in the least

Jumped out a 2 story building was kinda meh, but breaking out of jail by going through the ceiling, stealing an officers uniform and walking out the front door was pretty boss.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45083 posts
Posted on 2/17/19 at 8:08 pm to
I watched this recently and an ABC doc Hulu recommended.

Honestly, outside the Bundy narrative, I am so confused with the content that is presented and the content that is withheld.

In both, they liberally detail the murder of the victims. Literally murdering people. But both skate the details of his crimes.

Maybe it's just me, but I have difficulty accepting it's okay to discuss murdering people, but not for viewership the other heinous acts he committed.

I would expect redaction or omitting in a story piece, but a documentary shouldn't hold back. Especially if murder is okay to talk about. Not everyone watches docs, I get that. But a doc should be in your face truth IMO. Let a bio-pic hit the others.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81452 posts
Posted on 2/17/19 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

but breaking out of jail by going through the ceiling, stealing an officers uniform and walking out the front door was pretty boss.


Inmates had been telling the guards they heard him in the ceiling but they never looked into it.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45083 posts
Posted on 2/17/19 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Still not impressed by someone escaping a situation when they weren’t handcuffed or supervised in the least
If your job was killing women and defiling corpses in the 70s and getting caught then escaping and killing more women in the 70s, he was pretty good at it.

quote:

Pretty sure the kid from Making a murderer could’ve gotten out of that one
Yet he's in prison for a crime he didn't commit.
Posted by adp
Member since Jul 2015
2735 posts
Posted on 2/17/19 at 8:39 pm to
70's police were DUMB.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
45083 posts
Posted on 2/17/19 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

70's police were DUMB.
It's amazing the lack of sharing of information at that time.

I think you could literally just cross county crime and rarely be identified. Think about interstate truck drivers. You could do whatever during your traverse and police aren't sharing across.

Technology has made a huge difference now, along with national databases.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram