Started By
Message

Am I the only who thinks 'Manhunter' is much better than 'Silence of the Lambs?'

Posted on 4/18/21 at 1:22 am
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22773 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 1:22 am
... As well as the best Thomas Harris' film adaptation by a longshot?

Taking no disrespect Silence and that film (it was quite good for what it was) but Brian Cox's Dr. Lecktor, William Peterson as Will Graham, and the scariness of Francis Dollarhyde are all, to me, much better as a whole under Michael Mann's hand than Demme.

There's just something about Manhunter and that soundtrack that just stay with you where Silence does not.
.
This single 1-minute clip pretty much sums up exactly what I mean: LINK
This post was edited on 8/8/21 at 2:21 am
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 1:47 am to
I have them about both equal. They’re such different movies, but for some reason they both closely match the picture I had in my head while reading their corresponding novels.

I do think Anthony Hopkins’s Lecter has diminished in my opinion since watching Brian Cox’s and later Mads Mikkelson’s interpretation of the character.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20499 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 1:52 am to
It’s too rooted in the 80s for me to love it. I still like it, and recommend it, but I prefer silence of the lambs as a movie. I’m not a reader of Harris’ novels so I can’t speak to that aspect.

Also William Petersen kind of ruins it for me. I wish someone else was cast in that role. I do like Tom Noonan as dollarhyde & Cox as Hannibal though.
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 2:10 am to
Red Dragon was a more interesting book too, from what I can remember.
Posted by pevetohead
lurking behind sonic
Member since Apr 2017
2605 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 2:19 am to
Manhunter doesn’t get enough love as being one of the quintessential 80s films. Top tier filmmaking. William Petersen gives an incredible and haunting performance. God tier acting, he steals the show. Tom Noonan is AMAZING as the tooth fairy. Brian Cox is totally different than Hopkins’ Lecter BUT I think his portrayal fits the tone of Munhunter. Brilliant performance nonetheless.


Also I think Nicolas Winding Refn took plenty inspiration from Manhunter for Drive (2011)
Posted by Michael T. Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2004
8243 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 7:56 am to
Would it not be better to compare Manhunter to Red Dragon? Silence is a much different film, and obviously for Red Dragon Hopkins’ role was expanded. Pretty confident that William Peterson got the CSI Gil Grissom role because of Manhunter.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89531 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Brian Cox's Dr. Lecktor, William Peterson as Will Graham, and the scariness of Francis Dollarhyde are all, to me, much better as a whole under Michael Mann's hand than Demme.


Considering how poor Foster looks (particularly in hindsight) relative to the critical acclaim she earned, Sir Anthony, Glenn and Levine are all far more responsible for how well the film is received over the years. Problem is: Foster was playing sort of straight (pardon the pun), quaint even. The other 3 were over the top. Demme must be held partially responsible for this uneven keel the film had in that regard.

Manhunter is a far, far more intense, realistic, gritty film that is more neo-noir or psychological thriller than horror - at the end of the day and - difficult to say the acting is better when one considers Sir Anthony and Levine (underrated and often overlooked, but he was A+ as Buffalo Bill), but certainly more balanced - Peterson was much more of a match for Cox's Lecktor than Foster was for Hopkins' Lecter. Mann kept Manhunter at a much more even keel.

So, they're different films and offer different experiences. I don't really care for "horror" films, so I prefer Manhunter, but recognize the genius of Silence.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28363 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 8:52 am to
Hard call because they’re different styles. Certainly Peterson as Graham. A push on Lector.

I think I prefer Manhunter overall.i like the more emotional 80s-esque music/soundtrack heavy version.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37279 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Am I the only who thinks 'Manhunter' is much better than 'Silence of the Lambs?'



No. I don't think it's "much" better, but it is the better, more interesting film. Lambs is good for Hopkins' take, but that's about it (and even then Cox's is better).
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 11:01 am to
I love Manhunter and have always thought it was overlooked, especially after the release of Silence. But these movies are so different, I wouldn't say one was better than the other.

I saw Manhunter and Silence in the theater when they were released. Never read the books, and was completely unfamiliar with the characters. Hell, when I saw Silence, I didn't realize it was based on the same series of books as Manhunter until sometimes later.

I never thought Manhunter effectively established Lecktor as this super menace. Cox played it well, but it didn't really work for me. Hopkins' portrayal did work. Yes, it was over the top, but it was necessary for a character (who I didn't think I knew anything about) that had so little screen time. Also think it hurt the sequels where he had more screen time, but it was perfect for Silence.

Both Dollarhyde and Buffalo Bill were great supporting bad guys, but Ted Levine's performance was a masterpiece. Paradoxically, I think that creepiness hurt his career, whereas Hopkins got a boost.

Finally, I will always love Manhunter for being the first use of Ina Godda da Vida, and to great effect too.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 11:36 am to
In no way is that film better than silence of the lambs.
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
21608 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Also I think Nicolas Winding Refn took plenty inspiration from Manhunter for Drive (2011)

I can see that... with the lighting and use of color are outstanding, and both often use the visuals and music to do the storytelling.

Manhunter and SOTL are great in their own ways.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

In no way is that film better than silence of the lambs.


This. Nothing that followed Silence was ever better than Silence (as far as being of the same genealogy).
Posted by Rza32
Member since Nov 2008
3605 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 3:17 pm to
yes
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63327 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 3:35 pm to
Manhunter is the better film.

You don’t know nothing bout no “Strong As I Am.”
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4311 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

I do think Anthony Hopkins’s Lecter has diminished in my opinion since watching Brian Cox’s and later Mads Mikkelson’s interpretation of the character.

I think Hopkins was 1,000 times better in Silence than Hannibal and Red Dragon for a couple of reasons:

1. Silence is a better movie than the other two, especially concerning Lecter's character. His cell and cell block are creepy and intimidating and hearing about what he's done (disfiguring the nurse and eating her tongue, eating the census taker's liver, following Chilton until he disappears into the crowd) sometimes can be scarier than actually seeing it. Everyone brought their A game in Silence, including Tally (screenwriter) and Demme (director).

2. Hopkins was in his early 50s in Silence. He was thin in the face, fit, dark hair, and just the right age to be a mentor of sorts to someone in their mid/late 20s (like Clarice) while still appearing vigorous and physically formidable. When Hannibal and Red Dragon were filmed Hopkins was in his early/mid 60s, looked old, and had put on some weight. He just didn't have the same presence anymore.

Hopkins in Silence is kind of like the '85 Bears or '19 LSU in that their greatness might not have sustained over time but for one year they were arguably the best ever. Similarly, I think Cox and Mads were as good or better than the Hopkins we saw in Hannibal and Red Dragon - but not even close to Silence.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66422 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 3:59 pm to
I prefer it
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51606 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 4:09 pm to
Not at all. Manhunter is a very good film.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19240 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 5:34 pm to
I like Manhunter better.
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5507 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 6:32 pm to
I've been saying it for years. Manhunter is the best of the bunch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram