re: Scream 7 trailer #1

meh, it was just a simple trailer breakdown. points out some stuff you might've missed and gave his opinions on the different parts. he thinks the killer in the start of the trailer isn't the real killer(s). he thinks it was the girl's boyfriend playing a prank.

Stu (Matthew Lillard) is on the cast list on IMDB

LINK

quote:

---

I think you should definitely watch 5 and 6.

---

Welp, I watched both 5 and 6 yesterday, and they were absolute trash. Just overly ridiculous from top to bottom, and not in a fun way.

But at least I’m caught up and ready for 7 when it comes out.

They were just so overly ridiculous that it took me out of the movies.

I liked upping the body count but GF was murdering tons of people just out in the open with absolutely no repercussion. Packed subway cars. Multiple people on a convenience store. Etc.

The sisters are obnoxious and cocky assholes. And hilariously OP.

Small girls overpowering grown men gets tiresome (I can at least buy it with Sidney). I mean, in 6 the killers are Jack Quaid (which is fine) and then some tiny girl who’s like 4’10”. I’m supposed to believe she can kill or overpower anybody she meets? GTFO of here.

People shrugging off major stab wounds. I mean, the obnoxious black twin chick was essentially murdered (on a packed subway car, which nobody noticed btw) and then a little bit later shes hopping around with a bandage on her stomach like it’s no big deal. Same thing with black twin dude Chad in BOTH movies.

The acting was horrible too. The new cast was pretty much universally terrible. None of them can act worth a shite. Adults included.

They leaned WAY too hard into the meta thing. And 6 even moreso than 5, and it tries way too hard to force the meta stuff. Like the black twin chick was super annoying with all her “this is a movie” schtick. It was sort of funny and a cool concept with Randy in the OG movies, but now it was nothing but annoying.

Courteney Cox’s face was freaking me the frick out too. Especially in 6. It was so bad it was distracting. And I found an article where she acknowledges she went way too hard on fillers and shite and admitted her face looked weird as hell.

And GF is borderline magic with how he’s literally always in the right place at the right time.

But all in all, I’m glad I’m caught up, but they just weren’t very good. But at least I caught up and am ready for 7.

quote:

---

People shrugging off major stab wounds. I mean, the obnoxious black twin chick was essentially murdered (on a packed subway car, which nobody noticed btw) and then a little bit later shes hopping around with a bandage on her stomach like it’s no big deal. Sam’s thing with black twin dude Chad in BOTH movies.

---

This has been one of the biggest complaints of those 2 movies. Although I like Chad so im glad he survived. The two sisters are gone so you dont have to worry about them anymore. The twins will be in 7 though.

7 is being directed by the writer of the original Scream, Scream 2, and Scream 4...so it should feel more like the early movies I would think.

Side bar- which long running horror franchise has been the most consistent? Scream has to be up there.

Stu and Kincaid should be the killers. There’s no way Kincaid isn’t one of the killers in Scream 3.

You can find plot holes or loose plot points in anything if you pick at it enough, which is the case with the poster you’re referring too, a bit, but this:

quote:

---

Hell the very first kill they strung up Casey's corpse in a neighborhood with nobody seeing this?

---

Is not a good retort. They even state in the dialogue that they are “in the middle nowhere” so the cops won’t get there in time, and it takes the parents like a minute to make it to the house after she spots their headlights.

As far as complaints of the killer being in the right place all the time, that’s a troupe with all horror movie, and many other movies, the plot requires all sorts of contrivances to work.

In!

Don’t care if it’s a brows average movie, which it likely is.