- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report: Cloverfield 2 dropping on Netflix after Super Bowl
Posted on 2/5/18 at 10:46 am to TigerLunatik
Posted on 2/5/18 at 10:46 am to TigerLunatik
The thing that has he messed up is how they cut between 2008 and now as if it’s different POV of the same event.
Explosion, etc
But in reality it is different decades, different cities, different universes.
Explosion, etc
But in reality it is different decades, different cities, different universes.
0
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:04 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
The thing that still has me messed up is that in the very beginning of the trailer it clearly says "10 years ago, something arrived, now find out why." But, they never definitively say that in the movie.
JJ Abrams & Netflix - "Got another one."
Posted on 2/5/18 at 12:35 pm to Volvagia
Maybe I'm saying it wrong. But, in the original Cloverfield there wasn't an energy crisis. This movie shows the two survivors returning to earth while the attack is happening, which I thought happened years before this movie. So the space mission is years after 1st movie, but they return to earth while monster is attacking?
Posted on 2/5/18 at 2:30 pm to hg
The sad thing is, that’s probably the most reasonable and straight forward explanation for it all
Posted on 2/5/18 at 2:31 pm to RollTide1987
It was a decent movie. Not great. Not terrible.
Posted on 2/5/18 at 6:48 pm to Volvagia
quote:It's not that much of a stretch.
After the engine was shut down and they talked to Houston....sorry, Houston mysteriously moved to Huntsville because reasons.
Posted on 2/5/18 at 6:54 pm to pvilleguru
Except the monster we see at the end isn’t the same as the one in the 2008 film (this version is a lot bigger)
And even if it was, if it was located at that angle, it would have been on film in the last shot of the movie.
And even if it was, if it was located at that angle, it would have been on film in the last shot of the movie.
This post was edited on 2/5/18 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 2/5/18 at 7:42 pm to Volvagia
The CGI on it was pretty bad.
Posted on 2/5/18 at 10:07 pm to hg
The only CGI that bothered me was when the comic relief lost his arm and then the stub he was left with. Other than that I thought it was decent.
A lot of you people are getting way too worked up on continuity in a movie that explicitly told you, in the very beginning, that the depicted events were going to alter the reality of the past, present, and future.
A lot of you people are getting way too worked up on continuity in a movie that explicitly told you, in the very beginning, that the depicted events were going to alter the reality of the past, present, and future.
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:03 pm to Merck
quote:
A lot of you people are getting way too worked up on continuity in a movie that explicitly told you, in the very beginning, that the depicted events were going to alter the reality of the past, present, and future.
This.
I liked it and am fine with the flexible plot structure. It's a science fiction about clashing dimensions. Anything goes a this point.
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:45 pm to Freauxzen
8 pages in and no mention of
This post was edited on 2/6/18 at 7:28 am
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News