- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood opening day check in thread ***Spoilers Inevitable***
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:21 pm to Brosef Stalin
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:21 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Natalie Wood
Well, her name was Natalie.
0
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:21 pm to High C
quote:
What was with his severe/sick coughing seemingly only during the scenes where he was filming with the little girl and that western episode?
The tension of the first scene with AL Pacino is built around Rick's inability to articulate himself. He is constantly making noise with his mouth, but can hardly get a word out.
quote:
Also, it seems pretty obvious that Cliff did kill his wife, based on what he was capable of.
I don't think this was meant to be ambiguous.
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:23 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
I assumed it was smoker's cough. I think he had a cigarette in every scene.
Yeah, several of them seemed to have a cigarette in every sense. It just seemed that the coughing was much more pronounced and severe at that point in the movie.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:23 pm to PsychTiger
Hippie hitch hiker was great. very close to the truth there. Pretty blonde did a good Sharon Tate. Fell asleep, would not go again.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:24 pm to High C
quote:
Did anyone notice a slight stutter in DiCaprio’s character?
Yep. That was awesome. It was almost unnoticeable, but DiCaprio seals it when he lashes out at himself for being a stutterer.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:26 pm to Jay Are
quote:
The tension of the first scene with AL Pacino is built around Rick's inability to articulate himself. He is constantly making noise with his mouth, but can hardly get a word out.
That’s why I made the comment about the stutter. It was present throughout the movie, except when he was filming a scene.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:40 pm to jeffsdad
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:43 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I'm on a 2 movie streak of people snoring next to me in theaters
Posted on 7/27/19 at 6:59 pm to Sheftie
quote:
quote:
Basterds: bad
Youve been an insufferable basterd in this thread
IB is a modern masterpiece. Visually, dialogue, storytelling, suspenseful moments. Hans landa and aldo raine are two HOF tarantino characters. Christopher waltz is an absolute revelation in this
Your opinion is garbage
First of all. It's only a movie, not a political or social movement. Calm your mind.
With that out of the way.
It's not a "modern masterpiece". It's an overly talky yawner. Visually it's just a movie, there's nothing at all special or unique about the cinematography. The dialogue was long winded and the characters were poorly directed on when to shut up and move on.
Hans landa was a good character but brad pitt as aldo raine brought nothing more to the table other than a bad accent and the word "naatzee".
My opinion is garbage? Oky doky.
Your opinion is a loose peanutty turd.
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 7/27/19 at 7:01 pm to jeffsdad
quote:
Hippie hitch hiker was great.
Pimp of Cliff to not pick her up on the first two passes.
I don’t think I’d have had his restraint.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 7:12 pm to Pocket Kingz
quote:that it can't understand why someone doesn't like the same shite it does. Sad. I know.
Imagine a mind, so pedantic and impotent
What's sadder is that you seem to think these are the smart kid movies.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 7:36 pm to Jay Are
I had a couple before I went in, and it was cozy in there. Movie was slow, too.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:14 pm to blueboy
quote:
What's sadder is that you seem to think these are the smart kid movies.
Exactly.
Upvote deployed.
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:26 pm to PsychTiger
fricking loved it.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:28 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:Me neither, partner. Fine as cream gravy, that one.
Pimp of Cliff to not pick her up on the first two passes.
I don’t think I’d have had his restraint.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:01 pm to Jay Are
quote:
So, is this board really so full of old men that forgot to take their afternoon naps before going to the theater, or are these guys just lieing about falling asleep to exaggerate to make their point?
Actually I frequently fall asleep in theaters with the recliners but I was awake through this one.
I enjoyed it, not really a big Tarantino fan but it was alright. I did kind of have the ending pegged early on, was interesting to try to figure out how he was going to get there.
I am old enough to pick up some historical inaccuracies regarding the timing of some of the background pop culture references but that wasn't important, it was more about the era.
Margoe Robbie is a damn good looking woman and Sharon Tate was too, but that is obvious.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:05 pm to UsingUpAllTheLetters
The whole did not live up to the sum of its parts. Leonardo and Brad were incredible but the movie dragged, the story was unfocused and disorganized in a way that bordered on boring.
I totally understand why people fell asleep...my wife snoozed for about 20 minutes and when she asked me what she missed, I had nothing for her...
I think this is a film Hollywood will love but misses the mark for most. I liken it to Tarantino jerking off, he made a movie with the actors he wanted, the time period he wanted with long artistic shots that added little to the quality of the film...just made it 45 minutes too long. He has lost the ability to tell a good story.
I totally understand why people fell asleep...my wife snoozed for about 20 minutes and when she asked me what she missed, I had nothing for her...
I think this is a film Hollywood will love but misses the mark for most. I liken it to Tarantino jerking off, he made a movie with the actors he wanted, the time period he wanted with long artistic shots that added little to the quality of the film...just made it 45 minutes too long. He has lost the ability to tell a good story.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:08 pm to gthog61
quote:
I am old enough to pick up some historical inaccuracies regarding the timing of some of the background pop culture references but that wasn't important, it was more about the era.
You also have to remember that all of QT’s movies are set in the same alternate world, where things like the death of Hitler in the theater really happened.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:11 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
You also have to remember that all of QT’s movies are set in the same alternate world, where things like the death of Hitler in the theater really happened.
Well I know about minor details like that but Dyke Van Dyke's show ended in 1966 so nobody was interviewing Morey Amsterdam and Rose Marie in 1969 dammit!
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:20 pm to Fun Bunch
Okay this was not my favorite film of his or even close to it. Most the movie was not necessary. There was literally a point I thought, “why are we still on this scene?” Big DiCaprio fan and his character didn’t do much for me. Pitt’s character was the best thing about this movie and that’s with Margot Robbie being in it. Literally the three best scenes (most funny) had Pitt in it. Still can’t decide where to rank this one yet out of his movies. But it’s in the back half.
Page 7 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News