- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official "Inception" Thread (***SPOILERS***)
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:06 pm to Cs
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:06 pm to Cs
I have to be humbled and admit I was very lost during much of this movie. Nolan is my favorite, but there are a lot of important details that seemed to get skimmed over, and there's so much density to this movie I don't know where to start digging.
SPOLIERS
I enjoyed the "sidestory" about Leo and his wife's past MUCH more than the rest of the movie plot. The heist plot was pretty, well, it didn't really blow me away the way the sidestory did. This movie was weak in some areas, I felt, but those weaknesses were more than compensated for by Nolan's rare awesomeness in other areas.
that said, it's Chris Nolan. I'm used to brilliance, and it's probably what I got, whether I realize it or not. My problem--and the first thing I said when the movie ended--was that I felt he tried to layer far too much complexity into this film. There are so many logical leaps you have to take just to follow with the plot. I'll just have to watch it a few more times.
Anyone know of a nice review of the movie's plot that would make a good cliffnotes, just to give me some context going in for the next showing?
SPOLIERS
I enjoyed the "sidestory" about Leo and his wife's past MUCH more than the rest of the movie plot. The heist plot was pretty, well, it didn't really blow me away the way the sidestory did. This movie was weak in some areas, I felt, but those weaknesses were more than compensated for by Nolan's rare awesomeness in other areas.
that said, it's Chris Nolan. I'm used to brilliance, and it's probably what I got, whether I realize it or not. My problem--and the first thing I said when the movie ended--was that I felt he tried to layer far too much complexity into this film. There are so many logical leaps you have to take just to follow with the plot. I'll just have to watch it a few more times.
Anyone know of a nice review of the movie's plot that would make a good cliffnotes, just to give me some context going in for the next showing?
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:18 pm to Santa Clause
Did you read through the thread? Has some pretty good in-sight. Definitely need to see it again. I comprehended the whole movie fairly well. I think at the beginning there is a lot of vocabulary they use that is not real clear, but you kind of learn it as you go along. I am sure it will be much more revealing in a second viewing.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:27 pm to btwnthehedges91
Wow...I have to admit that for all of the hype it got it certainly lived up to it. Unreal.
ETA: No pun intended.
ETA: No pun intended.
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:49 pm to PortCityTiger24
Didn't think I would say this after watching Shutter Island earlier this year....but I am pretty sure Inception will be the movie to beat come Oscar season. Close race between these two, but I personaly would give it to Inception right now....Wow, Leo is in both??
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:51 pm to sug314
Over the last 5-6 years I'd say Leo has been about as good as it gets.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:53 pm to sug314
saw it today, thought it was great. At one point, it was almost like watching 2-3 movies at once. Thought they did an amazing job jumping between "layers" and how one had an effect on the other.
Was the top going to stop spinning right before the credits? seemed like it was starting to shutter a bit.
Was the top going to stop spinning right before the credits? seemed like it was starting to shutter a bit.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 8:54 pm to LSUStjames
quote:
Was the top going to stop spinning right before the credits
thus the awesomeness of the ending
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:01 pm to Santa Clause
quote:
Anyone know of a nice review of the movie's plot that would make a good cliffnotes, just to give me some context going in for the next showing?
Inception Review - reelviews.net
James Berardinelli is the best critic out there.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:02 pm to Breadcrumbs
quote:
James Berardinelli is the best critic out there.
Truth.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:21 pm to Cs
quote:
The ending of the film is pretty obvious, at least to me. It was reality, plan and simple. Dom's totem was tested multiple times in the first half of the movie while he was in a dream, and it spun perfectly, without any physical vacillations.
Totem falling at different times is irrelevant, simple cinematic slight of hand.
The whole movie was Leo's dream, his wife, before jumping out the building was right, they never really left the dream.
The Totem was his wife's not his and she was the one who brought it into the dream world she and Leo go into and that Leo never left. They specifically mention that it was his wifes totem and since she was the one that brought it into the dream world, Leo could not use it to test whether it was dream or reality, cause he never left the dream.
Therefor if he spins it, and his subconscious wants it to fall to keep the charade of the dream being reality alive it will. In the end he spins it and walks away, his conscious or subconsciousness no longer focusing on the top so it can keep spinning. The almost falling look Nolan gives is suspense on whether or not it will fall and since it does not and continues to spin=dream.
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:38 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
The Totem was his wife's not his and she was the one who brought it into the dream world she and Leo go into and that Leo never left. They specifically mention that it was his wifes totem and since she was the one that brought it into the dream world, Leo could not use it to test whether it was dream or reality, cause he never left the dream.
The point of the totem is not necessarily to test whether it is a dream or reality, the point is to test whether or not someone is being manipulated by an extractor.
quote:
Therefor if he spins it, and his subconscious wants it to fall to keep the charade of the dream being reality alive it will. In the end he spins it and walks away, his conscious or subconsciousness no longer focusing on the top so it can keep spinning. The almost falling look Nolan gives is suspense on whether or not it will fall and since it does not and continues to spin=dream.
I don't think any obvious answer can be derived from the film's conclusion. Quite clearly, Nolan intended there to be ambiguity there, or else he wouldn't have made such a sharp cut to the credits. It's similar to Tarantino's reluctance to state unequivocally what is in Marcellus Wallace's briefcase; it's up for the viewer to offer his or her own interpretation.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:46 pm to tigerguy121
I just got out of the movie, and I have to say that it's almost rendered me speechless. Very very rarely do movies draw me in as this movie did. I can tell now why this screenplay took Chris 10 years to perfect. There is so much care and attention to detail going on in almost every facet of this film. Chris, with this film in my opinion, has placed himself in the pantheon of some of the best modern architects of film and story in the last 20-30 years. He deserves it. What he has created with Inception is far beyond what most anyone is producing. I have to applaud Warner Brothers for making this film happen. My mind is still trapped in one or all of those levels of dream state. I had become disenfranchised with the theater experience. Inception renewed my faith that every once in a while it's worth it to pay the ticket, sit in a darkened theater and lose yourself for a few hours. Awash in and held close by story and character. Bravo Mr. Nolan
Posted on 7/16/10 at 9:57 pm to Geauxldineye
Just got out. Fantastic. Still mulling it over in my mind.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 10:01 pm to Dead Mike
quote:
conclusion. Quite clearly, Nolan intended there to be ambiguity there, or else he wouldn't have made such a sharp cut to the credits. It's similar to Tarantino's reluctance to state unequivocally what is in Marcellus Wallace's briefcase; it's up for the viewer to offer his or her own interpretation.
Disagree. Comparison btw pulp fiction and this movie don't work IMO.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 10:06 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
Disagree. Comparison btw pulp fiction and this movie don't work IMO.
I'm not really comparing the two films. The Pulp Fiction briefcase is used here as a paradigm...case.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 10:08 pm to Dead Mike
quote:
The Pulp Fiction briefcase is used here as a paradigm
It's a McGuffin.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 10:10 pm to tigerguy121
I loved that the last shot was as much of a tease as it is.
SPOILER
It's amazing that the slight wobble leaves you to wonder, was the whole thing a dream.
SPOILER
It's amazing that the slight wobble leaves you to wonder, was the whole thing a dream.
Posted on 7/17/10 at 12:55 am to Dead Mike
quote:
The point of the totem is not necessarily to test whether it is a dream or reality, the point is to test whether or not someone is being manipulated by an extractor.
After Ariadne forged her totem (the chess piece), she walked into the corner of the workshop where Dom was working on the dream machine. He came over, asked if he could hold her totem, and she said he couldn't.
Dom said that she was learning fast, and Ariadne said totems were a great idea, proceeded to ask Dom if it was his idea, and then she said, "It's a great way to keep track of reality."
So, the response the totem gives will tell the owner whether or not they are in someone else's dream, which may or may not be under siege by an extractor.
This post was edited on 7/17/10 at 12:58 am
Posted on 7/17/10 at 1:05 am to tigerguy121
quote:
The whole movie was Leo's dream, his wife, before jumping out the building was right, they never really left the dream.
no, hell no, the whole movie was not Leo's dream and thats not even up for debate
you can debate the end all you want but there was some reality before that, I guarantee
Posted on 7/17/10 at 1:13 am to Cs
And there is one huge inconsistency that I can't stop thinking about -
Level 4 was clearly limbo. After Fisher was shot, Ariadne and Dom decide to go and get him. It was established earlier in the film that limbo could be accessed through two means - if you voluntarily go deep enough, and subsequently "lose yourself", as did Dom and Mal, or if you die while heavily sedated.
It was also established in the garage in the first dream that limbo was a subconscious abyss, and that the only sense of structure that would be present would be from someone who had been there before - in this case, the only person was Dom.
Thus, when Fisher died, he entered into the limbo that Mal and Dom built and persisted in for 50 years. Dom and Ariadne voluntarily enter this state to retrieve him.
Once they awake on the shore, the fact that this is limbo is further reaffirmed by Ariadne asking Dom all of those questions about the structures, such as, "you built all of this?" As they were walking towards Dom and Mal's old apartment, it was clear from the dialogue, as well as the old structures where Dom and Mal used to live, that this was indeed limbo.
So, they finally make it to the apartment, and find Mal. Dom sits down at the table with her, and starts telling her how he first performed inception on her.
---> Here's the problem - at this time, Saito was still alive in the hospital in level 3. Dom had already been in limbo for some time before Saito died.
Before jumping off the building, Mal tells Dom to "find him and bring him back (Saito)".
We then get back to the scene that the film opened with. Dom hasn't aged one bit, while Saito has aged considerably (40+ years), yet Dom had been in limbo for a longer period of time than Saito.
There are also a few inconsistencies with the kicks - are they performed internally within a level to push the dreamer back a level, or does the kick need to be initiated at a level above the dreamers level to bring them to that level? There are instances of both in the film.
Level 4 was clearly limbo. After Fisher was shot, Ariadne and Dom decide to go and get him. It was established earlier in the film that limbo could be accessed through two means - if you voluntarily go deep enough, and subsequently "lose yourself", as did Dom and Mal, or if you die while heavily sedated.
It was also established in the garage in the first dream that limbo was a subconscious abyss, and that the only sense of structure that would be present would be from someone who had been there before - in this case, the only person was Dom.
Thus, when Fisher died, he entered into the limbo that Mal and Dom built and persisted in for 50 years. Dom and Ariadne voluntarily enter this state to retrieve him.
Once they awake on the shore, the fact that this is limbo is further reaffirmed by Ariadne asking Dom all of those questions about the structures, such as, "you built all of this?" As they were walking towards Dom and Mal's old apartment, it was clear from the dialogue, as well as the old structures where Dom and Mal used to live, that this was indeed limbo.
So, they finally make it to the apartment, and find Mal. Dom sits down at the table with her, and starts telling her how he first performed inception on her.
---> Here's the problem - at this time, Saito was still alive in the hospital in level 3. Dom had already been in limbo for some time before Saito died.
Before jumping off the building, Mal tells Dom to "find him and bring him back (Saito)".
We then get back to the scene that the film opened with. Dom hasn't aged one bit, while Saito has aged considerably (40+ years), yet Dom had been in limbo for a longer period of time than Saito.
There are also a few inconsistencies with the kicks - are they performed internally within a level to push the dreamer back a level, or does the kick need to be initiated at a level above the dreamers level to bring them to that level? There are instances of both in the film.
This post was edited on 7/17/10 at 1:15 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News