re: New Netflix docu-series "Making a Murderer" (Spoilers)

Got to love when they are complaining about not getting to tell there side of the story as they are being interviewed from a major news outlet... Sounds like a great opportunity to tell your side of the story.

WHOA. BOMBSHELL. Check out this interview with Brendan from February (before the "big" interviews the first week of March).

I don't think much of this got used in the documentary because it LOOKS VERY BAD FOR STEVEN AVERY.


ETA:

So maybe they find the bloody Rav4 on his property... but no body, no murder weapon and the key is still in it. There is no evidence anywhere in the house because it didn't happen in the house. The police find the remains of her burned body but can't find the knife (probably smelted)... So the cops plant the blood, a fragment of burned/shot skull from some other evidence box and the key in Steven's house during the week it's on lockdown.

ETA2:
He could also be covering for his brother/stepdad and saying it was Steven (his immediate family members had more violent history that Steven did).


ETA3:

Makes the whole fact that Brendan is in jail for life even more dispicable. I think the cops/state were worried that their only eyewitness was based on the word of a kid whose story contradicted the evidence they had planted.

Remember how the mom talked about making all the packages for 60 minutes, etc. for Steves first conviction and no one paid attention... Now she has an entire documentary on him and the power of the Internet community. Something ironic in there

quote:

---

I don't think much of this got used in the documentary because it LOOKS VERY BAD FOR STEVEN AVERY.

---

There are almost an uncountable amount of inconsistencies presented in the documentary that give me no doubt at least SOMETHING wasn't as it seemed. At the same time I have no doubt we saw a mere fraction of what was actually presented to the jury.

The defense attorney's themselves laid out what they needed to happen with regards to the key and the vial with regards to how the DA would play it. Unless I completely missed something nothing was ever shown in regards to those two items during the trial. The vial was clearly tampered with and the key had no other DNA other than Avery's...what are we missing? If those were such big hitting pieces of evidence why did we see no resolution during the trial.

Also, how did we not see anything in EITHER trial (Avery/Dassel) on how there is ZERO trace of blood in the bedroom?

Did I just miss all this and how ridiculous important they made this stuff seem?

I'm currently watching episode 9, this mess is absolutely depressing. Total injustice and lack of competence from people in that area. They sat back and allowed this department to railroad these half wits.

Yeah, but at least they found blood in the Jeep, although in the back.

No blood on the sheets, ok maybe he burned the sheets. But none seeped into the mattress?

Why not show the two different Brennan's interviews in the doc? He said he, Steve, killed her two different ways.

I'm 4 shows in. Regardless of the truth or what happens, the shite is crazy.

I also could not stand Teresa Halbachs brother. I know he lost his sister but my god what an idiot

Good god..............

Just hit the closing arguments. The DA just said it doesn't matter if the police planted evidence to help convict a guilty man.

WHATT
IN
THE
frickIN HELL

I think I heard that right. Please tell me I am wrong.

Came across this

LINK