- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/31/16 at 3:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I think we need a Saving Private Ryan reboot - but with a female cast and possibly a gay character having a significant role.
Posted on 7/31/16 at 4:36 pm to GetBackToWork
What about a 12 angry men reboot with women
Posted on 7/31/16 at 7:56 pm to luvdatigahs
If it would have been Ghostbusters 3 with the kids or relatives of the original cast(in minor but plot driven roles) and they just all happened to be women it would have been fine. People would have given it a chance just on that alone. But no, smartass director made it a point it was a agenda driven movie.
This post was edited on 7/31/16 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 7/31/16 at 8:19 pm to luvdatigahs
12 Angry Women?
Sounds like a monthly PTA meeting.
Sounds like a monthly PTA meeting.
Posted on 7/31/16 at 9:09 pm to finchmeister08
Tesla
Posted on 7/31/16 at 10:26 pm to ISEN_AG
Bad Moms was awesome.
Posted on 7/31/16 at 10:40 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
New Ghostbusters is Officially a Flop
Good.
Hollywood needed to be punished for this stupid PC/SJW stunt bullshite and thank god the free market was happy to oblige.
Posted on 7/31/16 at 10:50 pm to Sentrius
Where are the 2 or 3 posters who defended this movie?
Posted on 7/31/16 at 11:04 pm to luvdatigahs
quote:
What about a 12 angry men reboot with women
"12 Angry Persons That May or May Not Conform to Binary Gender Identification"
Posted on 7/31/16 at 11:06 pm to BamaSaint
quote:
Where are the 2 or 3 posters who defended this movie?
Names?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:34 am to BamaSaint
quote:
Where are the 2 or 3 posters who defended this movie?
In their safe spaces
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:39 am to Vols&Shaft83
After Oceans maybe we can get a female mob movie rehash like the departed or goodfellas 
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:42 am to BamaSaint
quote:
Where are the 2 or 3 posters who defended this movie?
I'm right here.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 12:45 am to Fewer Kilometers
Are you ready to admit you were wrong?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:10 am to Jack Ruby
So glad
Not for the movie.
But the agenda of the critics.
Not for the movie.
But the agenda of the critics.
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:14 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Big foreign markets like China and Russia and others like classic masculine, male led(usually Caucasian) action flicks. I remember hearing once that Denzel movies never do good there because he's black. Whether Hollywood likes it or not...those countries are FAR, FAR more bigoted and sexist than anywhere here in the states, no matter how much they try to push a false narrative.
This is common knowledge for leads but I doubt one character makes a difference.
Plus McCarthy is far bigger overseas than here, especially Europe where she kills....they love laughing at the fat American.
This post was edited on 8/1/16 at 2:16 am
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:46 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Are you ready to admit you were wrong?
Because I didn't hate a movie that underperformed at the box office?
Posted on 8/1/16 at 6:06 am to BluesDriver
Just watched it on the train today after paying the iron price for it.
I did enjoy Akroyd and Hudsons cameos but the movie would've been better if either they were related or they were starting a ghostbusters chapter in another city. They just remade Ghost busters but without the fun or tension.
It wasn't as bad as I thought it'd be but I would not recommend it. I'd give it a 4 or 5 out of 10. A decent movie but incredibly forgettable.
I did enjoy Akroyd and Hudsons cameos but the movie would've been better if either they were related or they were starting a ghostbusters chapter in another city. They just remade Ghost busters but without the fun or tension.
It wasn't as bad as I thought it'd be but I would not recommend it. I'd give it a 4 or 5 out of 10. A decent movie but incredibly forgettable.
This post was edited on 8/1/16 at 6:08 am
Posted on 8/1/16 at 6:34 am to lsufan9193969700
I just don't get why they didn't make it a continuation of the originals. Have all the women be the daughters of the original cast, possibly have a cameo in which Murray/Aykroyd are killed by ghost which spurs them to take their father's place.
Then you don't have the people bitching about rehashing already existing story-lines or it being PC. It would've given the new film validity as well if it had cameo's from the original cast to set it up. I really just don't get it.
Then you don't have the people bitching about rehashing already existing story-lines or it being PC. It would've given the new film validity as well if it had cameo's from the original cast to set it up. I really just don't get it.
This post was edited on 8/1/16 at 6:35 am
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News