Started By
Message

re: 'Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power' Ep 1 Negativity Thread. Enter at your own risk

Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

That's the crazy part. It's not!

At least as far as we know. How in the world can you call a show woke, just because a show set on a fantasy world has a multi-racial cast? Or because it has a female action heroine? That's insane.

Have any of you watched Star Trek? Either TOS or TNG? Both of those shows were incredibly woke for their times. There were pro-abortion and pro-LGBT episodes and constant liberal messages. And yet, there are probably some people here trashing ROP who are Trek fans.

This place is full of a bunch of miserable losers who would have nothing in life if they couldn't hate on everything.



"Woke," as used as a pejorative, is basically just the newest catch all term always angry right-wing culture warriors use to describe the social and racial changes being reflected in modern society that annoy them.

And you are 100% right about things like Star Trek. I mean hell, it is literally a show about a socialist utopian society of space explorers with some often fairly and deliberate liberal messaging. And we had a 13 page thread the other week with people freaking out because the cast of House of the Dragon said the show will illicit discussions about misogyny and patriarchy, which, required pointing out, the show and series has ALWAYS done that, and people should calm down.

But, I think there is just that period in some people's mental life cycle where they progressively don't want to deal with shifting internal tolerances, biases, and just generally shut down mentally or lash out when perceived social changes are presented in their environment or challenge their default ways of thinking.


This post was edited on 8/25/22 at 4:23 pm
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6583 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

How in the world can you call a show woke, just because a show set on a fantasy world has a multi-racial cast? Or because it has a female action heroine?


Let's say we re-make The Jeffersons - a groundbreaking african-american comedy series - and make Mrs. Jefferson asian, their children adopted brazilian children and make the focus of the show some random neighbor that was only in a few minutes of the original rather than how the original show was played.

Call it whatever you want, it was manipulated for a reason. That REASON... sucks. It's stupid. It's anti-art, anti-dignity and anti-intellectual. If you don't want to call it woke, fine. But this isn't someone writing original material with modern political overtones. This is SHOVING modern social sentiment into someone else's work and telling critics to shut up and live with it. If that doesn't bother you, enjoy. Amazon needs your money.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40613 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

That's the crazy part. It's not!

At least as far as we know. How in the world can you call a show woke, just because a show set on a fantasy world has a multi-racial cast? Or because it has a female action heroine? That's insane.



I'm not calling it woke, I was just meaning even if you put their main gripe aside. I haven't seen the show so I'm not going to judge it yet although I'm not getting my hopes up. But I'm going to give it a fair shot. If I don't like it, it certainly won't be because of black elves and dwarves though, that doesn't bother me.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22811 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

quote:

That's the crazy part. It's not!

At least as far as we know. How in the world can you call a show woke, just because a show set on a fantasy world has a multi-racial cast? Or because it has a female action heroine? That's insane.



I'm not calling it woke, I was just meaning even if you put their main gripe aside. I haven't seen the show so I'm not going to judge it yet although I'm not getting my hopes up. But I'm going to give it a fair shot. If I don't like it, it certainly won't be because of black elves and dwarves though, that doesn't bother me.
I think people are wary, because there HAS been an increase in stuffing social messages in various media (movies, TV shows, etc. Probably games too).

Probably the main reason Top Gun Maverick did so well, is it's devoid of any such preaching. There's a chick pilot and a black pilot (and Hispanic, etc), but they're cast honestly. You could swap them for anyone else, and you get the same movie... no specific lines of dialogue anywhere. The only message being pushed is-
live pilots may become outdated, but they aren't yet.

But if you search 'woke' by company, Amazon has been surprisingly good about it. While Disney has been pushing Girl Power etc since the Princess days (trying to increase market), Amazon has plenty of stuff that isn't woke. Reacher is a good ol boy, Terminal List is a pissed off SEAL on a revenge rampage (and actually has a message about 'stolen valor' wannabes in it). I think Amazon is still more about making money (and thus, appealing to the target audience).
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58665 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

NEW: What does the $1 billion #RingsOfPower mean for Amazon Studios? To put it in Tolkien-ese, the co has not yet closed its fingers, Gollum-like, around its preciousss: a major watercooler show that lures global viewers en masse. $AMZN #LOTRonPrime #LOTR

quote:

What constitutes a success for Prime Video is hard to say — but former Amazon Studios execs gave us a little bit of an idea. Like Bilbo rousing a dormant Smaug, the co is looking at how many inactive Prime users will be reawakened by #RingsOfPower.

quote:

Amazon Studios has made a mark with shows like The Boys. But as @RichLightShed said, “There's no doubt that Amazon has had success. [But] they haven't had a culturally defining show. There has been no massive breakout where everyone is talking about it."

quote:

The #RingsOfPower are a major bet, backed by Bezos himself. But Amazon Studios didn’t always have such grand ambitions, according to one former exec there. #LOTR

quote:

#TheRingsOfPower is the most expensive TV series ever created. But even in success, we’re unlikely to see something that big-budget again, say experts. The streaming wars are margin-slamming enough. Read our full story from me @eugenekim222 & @alisonbrower


LINK
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

The only message being pushed is-
live pilots may become outdated, but they aren't yet.


LOL

I loved the movie, but it is barely a step removed jingoistic/American imperialist military propaganda. The film literally had a DoD script advisory and thematic oversight contract with the filmmakers and studio in exchange for certain usage rights. The Navy had actively pushed for this movie for over a decade to help recruitment and branding.

But I guess stuffing that message into a movie is different, and somehow honest lol
This post was edited on 8/25/22 at 5:03 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40613 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

And we had a 13 page thread the other week with people freaking out because the cast of House of the Dragon said the show will illicit discussions about misogyny and patriarchy, which, required pointing out, the show and series has ALWAYS done that, and people should calm down.


I started off agreeing with you on the original topic in that thread and still do, but I do still disagree on the point of every main character having internalized misogyny as a theme of their arc.

There were 4,000,000,000,000 pages of Game of Thrones threads over the course of the series and not a single time did I see internalized misogyny mentioned. All of a sudden the House of the Dragon actress mentions it and it became a theme of GoT. There are obvious examples of it but I'm not buying an argument that tries to make me jump back in time and believe that something that was never talked about was now a theme for all the characters. Nobody can ever have a middle ground debate on here anymore. It's left and right and each persons argument is so predictable.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

every main character having internalized misogyny as a theme of their arc.


I said pretty much every female character touched on themes of patriarchy or internalized misogyny, some small, some large, some direct, some indirect, and I showed my receipts for it.

quote:

There were 4,000,000,000,000 pages of Game of Thrones threads over the course of the series and not a single time did I see internalized misogyny mentioned


Probably because the anti-woke movement wasnt a thing. For much of GoT's run the white identity culture wars were centered around keeping Mexicans and Islam away, and frick your feelings. Now, certain conservatives have done a 180 and get all in their feels for even the most minor of thematic exploration on topics of things like race, misogyny, and social injustice or how they are reflected in media.

And this is because if you zoom out and look at the history of right wing culture wars, they are reactionary in nature. They catastrophized and hyper focused in on gays in the military, rap music, Marilyn Manson, satanic panic, and school prayer as those became hot social topics or going ons in the 90’s. Catastrophized and hyper focused on gay marriage, Islam, and sufficient patriotic adherence in the 00's as momentum for gay marriage picked up and in reaction to 9/11. Catastrophized and hyper focused on the rise in Hispanic immigration in the 10's. Now in the 20's they are catastrophizing in response to Trans rights movements, BLM and Me Too. Just give it a few years and all the concern over "wokeness" will be shifted to the next big thing that needs some reactive outrage.
This post was edited on 8/25/22 at 5:43 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22811 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

I loved the movie, but it is barely a step removed jingoistic/American imperialist military propaganda. The film literally had a DoD script advisory and thematic oversight contract with the filmmakers and studio in exchange for certain usage rights. The Navy had actively pushed for this movie for over a decade to help recruitment and branding.

But I guess stuffing that message into a movie is different, and somehow honest lol
Different thing entirely

"Top Gun" is the Naval fighter training program, designed to produce elite fighter pilots (for the US Navy). That isn't a 'message', it's the backdrop and setting for these movies. Everyone involved will be tied into that theme.

Same as Ford vs Ferrari, you're looking at pushing performance out of automobiles... and the people who do that.

The messages that bug people are the ones that don't fit the theme, they're just stuffed in to make a commentary.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40613 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

said pretty much every female character touched on themes of patriarchy or internalized misogyny, some small, some large, some direct, some indirect, and I showed my receipts for it.


I know I meant to say female. But this will just have to agree to disagree, I'm not going to make something a thing now that wasn't a thing at the time, especially in indirect ways.

quote:

Probably because the anti-woke movement wasnt a thing. For much of GoT's run the white identity culture wars were centered around keeping Mexicans and Islam away, and frick your feelings. Now, certain conservatives have done a 180 and get all in their feels for even the most minor of thematic exploration on topics of things like race, misogyny, and social injustice or how they are reflected in media.

And this is because if you zoom out and look at the history of right wing culture wars, they are reactionary in nature. They catastrophized and hyper focused in on gays in the military, rap music, Marilyn Manson, satanic panic, and school prayer as those became hot social topics or going ons in the 90’s. Catastrophized and hyper focused on gay marriage, Islam, and sufficient patriotic adherence in the 00's as momentum for gay marriage picked up and in reaction to 9/11. Catastrophized and hyper focused on the rise in Hispanic immigration in the 10's. Now in the 20's they are catastrophizing in response to Trans rights movements, BLM and Me Too. Just give it a few years and all the concern over "wokeness" will be shifted to the next big thing that needs some reactive outrage.


This pretty much sums up why I'm neutral politically. I enjoy having perfectly normal friendships with people on the left and right and being able to laugh at both without getting offended. Or go tbrough life hating people because of their political beliefs. Hell my dad is right and my brother is left. I'd rather watch Battlefield Earth over and over than listen to them talk about politics, and that's family. Now you get on tigerdroppings, never visit the poli board, and you get politics on every board. This used to be a board where if something political was said, the response was take it to the poli board. Now it pretty much breaks out into a trump v biden, left v right debate with the original topic being irrelevant. O well.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Woke," as used as a pejorative, is basically just the newest catch all term always angry right-wing culture warriors use to describe the social and racial changes being reflected in modern society that annoy them.

And you are 100% right about things like Star Trek. I mean hell, it is literally a show about a socialist utopian society of space explorers with some often fairly and deliberate liberal messaging. And we had a 13 page thread the other week with people freaking out because the cast of House of the Dragon said the show will illicit discussions about misogyny and patriarchy, which, required pointing out, the show and series has ALWAYS done that, and people should calm down.

But, I think there is just that period in some people's mental life cycle where they progressively don't want to deal with shifting internal tolerances, biases, and just generally shut down mentally or lash out when perceived social changes are presented in their environment or challenge their default ways of thinking.


You can come up from sucking Karl Marx’s cock now.
Posted by CabtainStabbin
Member since Aug 2022
214 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 9:34 pm to
The whole push to try to make women badass warriors thing is so heavy handed and tiresome and yes, unrealistic.

"OMG it's a fantasy series! How can you complain about realism??"

THis argument comes up all the time in regards to fictional universes and it's complete bullshite.

Fantasy universes still have rules that they must follow that need to be cohesive and consistent to maintain suspension of disbelief.

If this trailer had machine guns and tanks would it be ok too? What if skateboarding dogs doing freestyle raps? I'm guessing people might object to those things being out of place. Because even fantasy universes with completely imaginary things must still follow rules for us to care about them.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20666 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Because even fantasy universes with completely imaginary things must still follow rules for us to care about them.


I'm going to let you in on a little secret: the Marvel movies have changed a number of the rules.

In fact, they have used "multiverse" crap to change all kinds of rules and literally rewrite history.

A few posts ago, I referenced Star Trek. Do you realize that they did the same thing with it? They went back in history and retroactively blew up the Romulans. They totally rewrote all the rules.

If you can't watch Rings of Power because Galadriel uses a sword or because there are black elves, then that says more about you than it says about the show.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22811 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

The whole push to try to make women badass warriors thing is so heavy handed and tiresome and yes, unrealistic.

quote:

Fantasy universes still have rules that they must follow that need to be cohesive and consistent to maintain suspension of disbelief.

For everyone losing their minds about Galadriel wielding a sword, it's not as far-fetched as you might think.

Peter Jackson had Arwen ready to take on the full 9 Nazgul in Fellowship, remember? And Tauriel (a completely made up character) was quite a warrior in the Hobbit films.
Neither is book canon, but it's both accepted, and a means to display how Elves are superior to Men.

Now, apply that to Galadriel, who Tolkien listed among the elite Noldor (even when they were all still alive). And keep in mind, he wrote that she was spirited and willful, AND DESIRED TO RULE HER OWN REALM. How was she planning to do that, by going over and finding a suitable king to marry? Doesn't seem her style, notice that even with Celeborn in Lothlorien, she's doing more of the talking. He's kinda just "there".

And Tolkien himself wasn't averse to having female warriors, as seen with Eowyn.

There's no mention of Galadriel having martial abilities, but there's no mention of her not, either. I would think, at the very least, she would be a nightmare for a few Orcs to face.

I mean, take your average attractive, athletic girl, put a sword in her hand, train her for a thousand years in a medieval war zone, and see if she's any good afterwards.
Posted by CabtainStabbin
Member since Aug 2022
214 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:05 am to
It's not just LOTR, people are exhausted from Hollywood pushing these skinny little women being bad arse physical fighters so aggressively the past 5-7 years.

They don't know how to competently write strong female characters without turning them into wanna be men.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
52570 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 1:15 am to
quote:

I hope you’re having a kickass Thursday, my friend


Cooked a stuffed tongue rice and gravy and had a good ole fashion fun time listening to classic country. A lot better than you keto loving homo.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22811 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 1:49 am to
quote:

It's not just LOTR, people are exhausted from Hollywood pushing these skinny little women being bad arse physical fighters so aggressively the past 5-7 years.

They don't know how to competently write strong female characters without turning them into wanna be men.

Understood, but both Tolkien himself, and then PJ with his films, opened the door to Galadriel being VERY badass.

Simply put- Galadriel is a Noldor, from Valinor, who lived amongst the Trees.

Legolas, a mere Silvan Elf, was written to have some skill far superior to Men (in the books, it's his light steps that allow walking on snow, running on ropes, his skill as an archer surpassing any mortals, etc). PJ made him a super-ninja badass.

The Noldor are generally seen as far superior to the Silvan Elves. They rolled back Morgoth's armies with ease when they arrived, after he was having his way with the Elves that were present in Middle Earth. They almost all died, but not without some serious heroics... Fingolfin wounded Morgoth, Finrod broke iron chains and killed a werewolf with his bare hands, Glorfindel took out a Balrog, etc.

Galadriel is a female, yes; but not just any random chick. Remember she's not human...
quote:

she is described as "the mightiest and fairest of all the Elves that remained in Middle-earth"
quote:

During the Darkening of Valinor, she was very independent and visionary. She swore no oaths, but the words of Fëanor concerning Middle-earth kindled a desire in her heart, as she was eager to see those wide unguarded lands and rule a realm of her own. During the troubles that followed, even though she participated in the revolt of the Noldor,[9] she fought against Fëanor in defence of her mother's kin in the Kinslaying of Alqualondë.
quote:

the White Council was formed. Galadriel, being one of the Wise and the greatest living threat to Sauron, was one of the members
quote:

Galadriel was especially tall and beautiful, even among the Noldor, and her hair was the most notable feature about her. It reminded the Eldar of the light of the Two Trees.[8]:229-230 At least in her earlier years, was of a somewhat proud and rebellious nature. She was free-spirited, and during her time in Aman had many dreams of wide unexplored lands. In her youth, she was very willful and of an "Amazon" disposition; and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats.[21] Her favourite brother was Finrod, for he, too, shared this vision. She could explore the minds and hearts of others, and her gaze was seeing. It may have been because of her unusual beauty and power that she became proud.
quote:

At the time of her birth, Finarfin named his only daughter Artanis. Her father-name meant "Noble Woman" in Quenya, from arta + nís.
Due to Artanis's height and her great strength of body and will, Eärwen chose the Quenya name Nerwen, meaning "man-maiden"

There's a ton of descriptions of "early" Galadriel as "strong", "powerful", athletic, etc. One of her early names meant "man-maiden", and certainly not in a derogatory or LGBT way, but more like "comparable to" in strength.

I'd say she might be at least as strong as Gil-Galad, and he and Elendil took Sauron down in a fight.

She ought to be able to frick up some orcs and the occasional troll.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42055 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 3:26 am to
quote:

"Woke," as used as a pejorative, is basically just the newest catch all term always angry right-wing culture warriors use to describe the social and racial changes being reflected in modern society that annoy them.


Well, woke IS a pejorative. Because it's a vile, divisive and ugly concept.

It's starting with a premise that certain people are perpetually privileged, and that all others of a minority status are free to blame said group for all their perceived handicaps and shortcomings.

It's the idea that one group needs to 'check themselves', and give back, to those in the present for the imagined slights of events from the past.

Others must be lessened so that the victims can be artificially lifted up to their 'rightful' place.

It's revisionist bilgesnipe, and total garbage. And it has zero to do with Tolkien's works, and should be found no where in any adaptation.
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 4:01 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44159 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:02 am to
quote:

says just as much about you that you don’t.


Thanks for proving my point.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
21976 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 5:48 am to
quote:

I guess stuffing that message into a movie is different, and somehow honest lol

You’re the worst poster on this board and maybe the OT, that’s saying something

POS
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram