Started By
Message

re: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:42 am to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157134 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Each movie is way over the top. The latest was no different, just a far more cynical younger generation.

Incorrect. Like I said, every IJ movie has moments like that. But IJatKotCS was literally full of them. It was one ridiculous thing after another, and they kept getting more and more stupid and unbelievable.

That's always been my main problem with that movie...not that it requires suspension of belief, but that it requires so much of it that it's actually insulting and it takes away from the movie.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:46 am to
i've tried to watch KOTCS but it's cinematography took me out of it. just could not deal with it
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157134 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:47 am to
The Billy Madison thing was Jack Nicholson, btw.

Just making sure you knew that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:49 am to
it was also 1974, but that would have been THX territory
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104356 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


Without a doubt the worst movie I've seen in theatres. Just terrible.

Like Cokes said, I can handle a little implausibility, but when damn near every scene in the movie makes me want to , then it's pretty terrible.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
11381 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:52 am to
quote:

But KotCS just took that suspension, threw it overboard in the middle of the ocean, tossed an inflated raft into the water, then took out a gun and shot the raft, then was all like "lol j/k" and threw down a rope to pull up the suspension, and just as suspension got to the railing, it cut the rope and let it fall back into the water, and as it drowned in the water, KotCS turned the ship so that it got eaten up by the ship's giant propellers.
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43588 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 7:55 am to
I still re-watch Crystal Skull. Don't care what others think.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31595 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:17 am to
Okay, I'll be objective.

I didn't mind the fridge. Its a funny meme, and I know its ridiculous, but it wasn't a deal breaker. Indy joining OSS in WW2 is 100% plausible and likely, too.

And I'll give you almost everything up to the waaaaaay toooooo looooong swordfight scene on the cars through the jungle.

But after that, the movie was crap. CRAP. It ruined it. The entire last act was one of the worst I've ever seen. Ever. Dude Wheres My Car had a better final act.

Lets not forget that Indy has always had strong supporting characters. Marian and Salaah in Raiders, Shorty in Doom, and Marcus and his Dad in Last Crusade. The supporting cast in this sucked. (I'm talking to you, Shia.) That was a terrible miscast.

I don't care if they want to turn Indy into a James Bond type franchise and recast the role. Indy's a lot of fun, and theres a ton of stories to be told in the genre. I even like Chris Pratt's name being thrown around.

But you:
- A) have to cast it correctly.
- B) have to keep George Lucas away from it. Lets face it, George needs to never get behind a camera again. I appreciate what he's given us and we will owe him forever as his creations live long beyond him. But staaph.
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 8:19 am
Posted by YankeeHandle
St. Louis
Member since Nov 2014
1820 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:08 am to
I knew the movie was going to suck in the first two minutes when I saw the terrible CGI praire dogs. I should have walked out at that very moment. Steaming pile of a movie.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:12 am to
quote:

They could show Indiana Jones eating a sandwich for 2 hours and I would enjoy it. It's freaking Indiana Jones.
that's what lucas and speilberg were counting on
Posted by 911Moto
Member since Sep 2013
5491 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:50 am to
I don't get the hate for it either. Easily better than Temple of Doom. I've read a few books by the guy that wrote Skull, and it was just like his other stories (all of which were enjoyable) - and having Indy attached just made it that much better. I'd continue seeing Indy movies of similar quality as long as they would churn them out.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Easily better than Temple of Doom





Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24684 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:17 am to
Better than Temple?

That is funny.

I hated Indy not being Indy. I mean it started great when the silhouette appeared and he put on his hat, it faded quickly when he started talking about her speech - the Indy of before would be spitting mad at this point. Too many characters too. Was Ox necessary? Was the kid really necessary? The CGI was totally unnecessary - Game of Thrones has proven that less is better - much, much better.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:30 am to
Temple of Doom is the most underappreciated movie, maybe ever.

even if it weren't so fricking great, I would laugh. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is that bad.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61577 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:44 am to
quote:

I hated Indy not being Indy. I mean it started great when the silhouette appeared and he put on his hat, it faded quickly when he started talking about her speech - the Indy of before would be spitting mad at this point. Too many characters too. Was Ox necessary? Was the kid really necessary? The CGI was totally unnecessary - Game of Thrones has proven that less is better - much, much better.


either Ox or Mac should have been Sallah.

if Ox had been Sallah it would have made sense why Indy was so hell bent on saving him.

if Mac had been Sallah it would have come as a genuine shock that he would betray Indy rather than being one of the most telegraphed bad guy turns I've ever seen in a film.

instead we got two characters that we had never seen but were expected to believe they were some of Indy's best friends.

hell, even bringing back a character from Young Indiana Jones like an ultra old Remy or getting the kid that played Short Round would have been better.
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 11:48 am
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:47 am to
the movie just shouldn't have been made.

I walked out of theater numb at how awful it was, then my gf at the time who essentially had to be dragged there loved it...didn't last more than a couple of months after that.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157134 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Fox Mulder

How are you not in the X Files thread?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:50 am to
several reasons

1. the word "reboot", I'm hesitant to look and see that they're not bringing back the gang.

2. I don't really want to get my hopes up

3. I'm starting to think I want them to leave it alone.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:51 am to
quote:

The CGI was totally unnecessary - Game of Thrones has proven that less is better - much, much better.


This is one of the many reasons I cannot stand the Game of Thrones tv show. The pisspoor portrayal of the direwolves, my favorite part of the books, turned me off immediately. I love CGI in movies - it makes for a far better experience to me. I can rarely tell if it is actual CGI. Someone mentioned the prairie dogs being CGI - I thought they were real. I think most people who rant against CGI have no idea what they are talking about.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61577 posts
Posted on 3/18/15 at 11:54 am to
quote:

1. the word "reboot", I'm hesitant to look and see that they're not bringing back the gang.


from everything I've read Duchovny and Anderson both want in and the only potential block could be their availability.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram