Started By
Message

re: House of the Dragon S1E7: “Driftmark”--Official Thread

Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

I've thought about this a lot as a plot device that makes no sense when you actually think about it, like a multitude of things I'm Harry Potter. How does the dragon know their rider is dead if they didn't witness it?


They develop a bond, that is in part magical. I guess you could consider it soul bonding? They just know when that bond is broken.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37063 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 9:09 pm to
But what happens now that Laenor is still alive? I guess no one else can mount Seasmoke…
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

But what happens now that Laenor is still alive? I guess no one else can mount Seasmoke…


That’s correct. This is from the ASOIAF wiki on dragons:

quote:

Once a dragon has bonded with a rider, that dragon will not allow anyone else to mount it alone while its rider lives, no matter how familiar said person might be to the dragon.[10] But when the person bonded to the dragon is on the dragon's back, they may take a passenger.[17][45] When the rider of a dragon dies, that dragon can bond with a new rider.[38] No rider has ever ridden a different dragon while their current dragon was alive.


That said, it’s not uncommon for dragons to wonder off after their rider has died. Theoretically, Seasmoke could fly off to wherever Laenor ends up and it could be assumed he’s essentially retired himself which wouldn’t raise suspicion if Laenor never rides him again.

In the book, Seasmoke flew off after Laenor died and spent time at a volcano behind Dragonstone.
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 10:23 pm
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 10:26 pm to
I guess since Dany never rode her other 2 dragons that explanation didn’t conflict with Jon Snow riding one of them?
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43450 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 10:29 pm to
People are getting uptight about "spoilers" but the information you seek on the rules of dragons and their dragon riders can be easily found on Wiki's
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

People are getting uptight about "spoilers" but the information you seek on the rules of dragons and their dragon riders can be easily found on Wiki's


Which is completely full of spoilers.

So I generally just copy and paste the parts that aren’t spoilers.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

I guess since Dany never rode her other 2 dragons that explanation didn’t conflict with Jon Snow riding one of them?


That’s my assumption as well. Dany rode Drogon, Jon rode Rhaegal.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
47024 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 11:21 pm to
Drogon peaced out while Dany was playing at ruling Mareen and chaining her dragons so it's not impossible for a dragon to leave it's rider
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 11:22 pm
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74271 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 11:36 pm to
Everyone needs to go and watch the Game of Thrones episode where Joffrey gives Sansa a tour of the dungeons.

This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 11:46 pm
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
9319 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Targaryens, Velaryons, and the Hightowers
also bears noting again that all three of these houses are basically ruined by the time we get to GOT


Otto quite literally ruined a very prominent Westerosi family. They are still around for ASoIaF, but there is a reason why they have very little influence in that saga. The Hightowers deference in later crown affairs is because of Otto's mistakes.

Targaryen rule and Velaryon power were always tied to them having nukes when no one else did. Once the nukes die out, the proud houses of Westeros were never going to continue to back two upjumped houses who overthrew millenia of home rule, especially when the family had a one in two chance of creating a batshit ruler.

Otto's pride and stupidity is the central tragedy of this story.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 12:04 am
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33369 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

I must have missed that. As a book reader I unfortunately know the fates of the characters if the book is followed which like GoT any character you start to like never has a happy ending. No matter who you are pulling for it seems.


I guess it’s good that non of these characters are likable
Posted by QC Reb
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2022
200 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:39 am to
I'm late to the party here but am I the only one who supports the Greens? I don't find Rhaenyra likeable at all and while Daemon is a compelling character he has done some very twisted things.

What Alicient said is true for Rhaenyra to flaunt her bastard children around is an insult to decency and the idea of them inheriting the throne when all the lords of the realm know they are illegitimate is laughable.

I blame Viserys for this situation getting to the point it has. After witnessing the events that unfolded it is crazy to me that he thinks there can still be peace in his family.His grandson cut out his son's eye and his response was everyone love everyone we are a family!
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 10:50 am
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:51 am to
quote:


I'm late to the party here but am I the only one who supports the Greens? I don't find Rhaenyra likeable at all and while Daemon is a compelling character he has done some very twisted things.

What Alicient said is true for Rhaenyra to flaunt her bastard children around is an insult to decency and the idea of them inheriting the throne when all the lords of the realm know they are illegitimate is laughable. Ultimately

I blame Viserys for this situation getting to the point it has. After witnessing the events that unfolded it is crazy to me that he thinks there can still be peac e in his family.His grandson cut out his son's eye and his response was just everyone love everyone we are a family!




I continue to find it fascinating how many people relate to the Greens because they are mad Rhaenyra isn't adhering to Patriarchial norms and arbitrarily designed customs about inheritance in a world based on medieval Europe and it's draconian laws and customs. Though should be pointed out, this is not a democracy. The king decides who inherits the throne and the King's word is final. Alicent can be as pissy as she wants but she is ultimately the one carrying out the greater sin in this world of fomenting treason against the will of the king.

And Rhaenyra is still the one named heir, not Alicent's children. Her children out of wedlock are a matter of the next succession, not hers. Alicent literally has no legal ground to stand on because the king's word is law and the king has named Rhaenyra.

Viserys only sin at this point is that he has tried to play mediator and low effort peacemaker when he should have had Alicent tried for plotting treason and attempting to murder his daughter and heir, and those in her House attempting to usurp his will hung with her.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 10:59 am
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
8368 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 10:59 am to
and right on cue is the resident Feminist Bronc charging in with his 'down with the patriarchy' schtick whenever someone brings up Rhaenyra being a whore and how its 'totally unfair!'.


s*** is hilarious.
Posted by QC Reb
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2022
200 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:00 am to
While it is true the King's word is law there is nothing that says they have to follow it once he is dead. Throughout history there have been several instances of the King's will being ignored.

King Edward VI wanted Lady Jane Grey to be queen after him and that didn't last very long.

Richard the Lionheart pardoned the boy who shot and killed him as a final mercy. Once Richard was dead they flayed the boy alive anyways.

Also while it may seem draconian it was very important to uphold the structure of society and the integrity of the crown. Even rumors of illegitimacy can completely destabilize a kingdom.

The fact is no matter what Viserys says it is guaranteed that after he dies there will be conflict. People will see his son as the rightful heir. He can feel good all he wants that he is doing right by his daughter but he is essentially poisoning the realm and setting in motion a bloody war of succession once he passes on.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:17 am to
quote:


and right on cue is the resident Feminist Bronc charging in with his 'down with the patriarchy' schtick whenever someone brings up Rhaenyra being a whore and how its 'totally unfair!'.


Didn't know there was such a feverish contingency of 8th century patriarchy defenders around here lol

What is it? Does Alicent get you going cause you imagine a world where a woman would actually be with you since she would feel forced to due to laws and pressure?

You know, there are countries where that dream can come true for you? Woman will even be forced to cover their whole bodies so as to not risk you getting jealous and having to kill her.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:25 am to
quote:

While it is true the King's word is law there is nothing that says they have to follow it once he is dead. Throughout history there have been several instances of the King's will being ignored


Well, by law and tradition the named heir is immediately named the new ruler and so Alicent would remain in the same predicament.

quote:

King Edward VI wanted Lady Jane Grey to be queen after him and that didn't last very long.

I mean Im pretty sure some of this story is pulled from history like this but Edward the V was never crowned, usurped by his protector and then the protector was killed.

Which further adds to my overall critique of Alicent, she has been offered a perfectly amicable solution to every party's grievances but shoved it aside due to her vindictiveness and jealousy of Rhaenyra.

That to me stands above all else for why she is not easy to side with any longer, or even feel much sympathy. Conflict ONLY happens because she is fomenting it. Full Stop.

If she agreed to the shared inheritance after Rhaenyra and publicly embraced the family there would be no House strong enough, or dumb enough to stand against them.

This is all on Alicent.
Posted by QC Reb
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2022
200 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:33 am to
On paper it would seem that once the king dies his named heir immediately assumes power but in reality it is more complicated than that as there still needs to be a coronation. For a coronation to go through both the lords of the realm and the church (in this shows case the faith) have to show their support and if there are widespread rumors of illegitimacy it becomes unlikely they will be willing to give this support. While it is true that Alicient could have compromised, why should she have to? She knows the truth and doesn’t want to marry her only daughter to a bastard. No matter what her husband says, she knows her son has the strongest claim to the throne. If Rhaenyra’s claim was so strong she wouldn’t feel the need to be making the marriage offer alliance in the first place.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

While it is true that Alicient could have compromised, why should she have to?


She literally has no rightful claim to the throne though cause all that is not trumped by the king's word. And her fomentation of treason is endangering her children that much more because the two strongest houses in the realm back Rhaenyra.

People can be upset, but the kings word is the king's word and Alicent is actively fomenting acts of treason while also recently attempted to kill Rhaenyra.

There really is no defense of Alicent on legal or moral grounds at this point.

This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 12:18 pm
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
47024 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 12:22 pm to
Alicent has zero claim to the throne. Aegon has a claim as the eldest of King Viserys, but he has not interest in pushing that claim and even states as much.

How much support is he going to have when he is playboying around the realm telling everyone he supports Rhaenarya?

This is all a construction of the Hightowers who are not actually in any danger
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram