- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:46 am to Fun Bunch
Season 1 was in 2024, so not too bad by todays standards. I think it's because Guy Ritchie needs to fit it into his schedule. He's a very busy director
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:46 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
There's absolutely no reason why a show like this should take like 3 years per season
Definitely too long between seasons.
quote:
Slow Horses should be the standard
I think they're a bit of an exception given they have strong written content to pull from, mostly practical effects, and it lends to being able to film back to back (worth noting they're only 6 episode seasons as well).
Also, I'm pretty sure that's Oldman's last project before retires and filming in London is convenient for a lot of that cast.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 11:05 am to BluegrassBelle
The movie and season 1 were both great
Ready to watch this. Also the brother is such a colossal frickup haha
Ready to watch this. Also the brother is such a colossal frickup haha
Posted on 8/25/26 at 11:05 am to BluegrassBelle
Ahh didn't make the connection. he definitely lost some weight before AKOTSK.
Popular
Back to top

2







