Started By
Message

re: "Gravity" Tomatometer Thread: 215 Reviews, 98% Fresh

Posted on 10/11/13 at 9:40 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 10/11/13 at 9:40 pm to
Great to see you've come to rain on the parade for the thousandth time. You get a prize with that, which is bleach. Now go drown yourself in it.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37240 posts
Posted on 10/11/13 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

it's just my personal way of ranking things. it may very well be a 5/5 to other people. im just saying that I, personally, can't give it 5 stars. 5s are reserved for movies that mix story, writing, acting, cinematography, and score/soundtrack together perfectly (imo of course). i never give these out. so, in essence, im not knocking gravity for the light story, i just cant give it a perfect rating.


Understood.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37240 posts
Posted on 10/11/13 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

This movie, just like Children of Men was an above average movie that for whatever reason, people want to lose their shite over. Cauron is the Judd Apatow of sci-fi flicks. Solid movies, but damn people lose their minds over them.


Just sad.
Posted by DURANTULA
Member since Jun 2013
1885 posts
Posted on 10/11/13 at 11:36 pm to
You can't honestly tell me that you believe that Gravity is more than a solid movie. There's no way. Unless you are going all in on visuals, then there is no way. And even if you go all in on visuals, then there is no way you can rate it better than movies like Avatar or Megamind (which aren't masterpieces by any means) because they are better visuals than this piece.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37240 posts
Posted on 10/12/13 at 12:24 am to
quote:

You can't honestly tell me that you believe that Gravity is more than a solid movie. There's no way.


Why isn't there a way? So opinions are wrong?

quote:

Unless you are going all in on visuals, then there is no way. And even if you go all in on visuals, then there is no way you can rate it better than movies like Avatar or Megamind (which aren't masterpieces by any means) because they are better visuals than this piece.


This makes no sense.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 10/12/13 at 6:20 am to
quote:

Why isn't there a way? So opinions are wrong?



Any opinion that isn't GCA's is clearly wrong. The guy reads multiple film sites for god's sake. How are we to compete with him?
Posted by DURANTULA
Member since Jun 2013
1885 posts
Posted on 10/12/13 at 6:34 am to
Why you so mad bro? Btw, thanks for the rent-free room in your head. Quite the luxury in this economy.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64945 posts
Posted on 10/12/13 at 7:37 am to
The people have spoken and Gravity is a huge hit. On track to make around $40-45 million this weekend. Which is amazing considering its $55 million gross last weekend.

quote:

Warner Bros‘ hit holdover Gravity expanded into 3,660 North American theaters and is still in such strong orbit that it’s running rings around newcomers. After making $12.4M Friday (only -30% from a week ago), the space drama should finish with a $40M (and possibly $45M) second weekend and $124M cume through Sunday thanks to an 84% 3D ratio.


quote:

Thanks to those repeat viewings and astounding VFX and great word-of-mouth, this Oscar-buzzed original thriller is on track for one of the year’s top second weekend sales on Fandango. (First is Iron Man 3.) According to Fandango and MovieTickets.com, Alfonso Cuaron’s space thriller starring Sandra Bullock and George Clooney accounted for 47%-48% of all online tickets sold from Thursday to Friday. Meanwhile, Gravity‘s global grosses could rocket near $175M in its first 10 days of release.


LINK
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Member since Feb 2006
11646 posts
Posted on 10/12/13 at 10:44 am to
solid 8/10
Posted by lsugradman
Member since Sep 2003
8544 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 10:23 pm to
I really enjoyed this film. Visually stunning and very well done.

With that said i actually felt like it needed to be longer. The film really needed about 20-30 mins of prologue to better develop characters and build the story. Felt a bit too forced.

8.5 /10 for me
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:14 pm to
6.0/10

For me, the most important things about movies are story, acting, and dialogue. Gravity was poor in all three respects. I felt no urgency, whatsoever, in Sandra's plight... her fate never in doubt. Most of the plot details were ludicrous and much of the action was repetitive, but I won't go into those for fear of spoilers. Special effects were this movie's only saving grace, but after Avatar and Return of the King and Toy Story III and so many other what nots... who really cares?
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18402 posts
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:04 pm to
Wasn't impressed with this movie. I enjoyed the first half but once it went into Sandra Bullock mode it went downhill.

7/10
Posted by Wizard_of_Aahs
Member since Jun 2013
148 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:13 am to
I saw this yesterday, matinee show. I was the only person in the theater, sat very close to the front and watched it in 3D. No distractions. I cannot think of a better way to watch this movie as it really allowed me to be immersed in the solitude and magnitude of space.

All I can say is, "Wow". What a movie. If you don't leave this movie with an appreciation of the depth of the human spirit, you have no soul.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36581 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:35 am to
quote:

story, acting, and dialogue


I get the acting and dialogue though I didn't think it was that bad but what's wrong with the story? Its very simple but there is no need complicate it.
Posted by Wizard_of_Aahs
Member since Jun 2013
148 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:42 am to
quote:

I felt no urgency, whatsoever, in Sandra's plight... her fate never in doubt.


Really?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115391 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:43 am to
Didn't Durantula say this movie wouldn't do that well at the Box Office?

It is making BANK. It is a worldwide phenomenon. Basically, Cuaron will be able to make any movie he wants now.
Posted by Wizard_of_Aahs
Member since Jun 2013
148 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:39 pm to
I don't see how Durantula could say there is no character arc. The entire movie seems to be a metaphor for rebirth and the struggle to live. Sandra Bullock starts as a scared, inexperienced rookie with nothing to live for, survives multiple disasters, at one point is floating in a fetal position with her tethers looking like umbilical cords, almost gives up and then survives, rising from the sea as if reborn. Presumingly to live a life where she does more than just go to work and then drive around all night as she did before this experience.

This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37240 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I don't see how Durantula could say there is no character arc. The entire movie seems to be a metaphor for rebirth and the struggle to live. Sandra Bullock starts as a scared, inexperienced rookie with nothing to live for, survives multiple disasters, at one point is floating in a fetal position with her tethers looking like umbilical cords, almost gives up and then survives, rising from the sea as if reborn. Presumingly to live a life where she does more than just go to work and then drive around all night as she did before this experience.


This.

I don't get the story complaints. It was a simple man vs. himself, man vs. nature story.

Or the acting complaints honestly. So the acting wasn't "the greatest ever." Ok, that's not a fault, and no one is saying it is. It was a solid performance with some very good high points. Just because it isn't amazing, that doesn't mean it's terrible.

And I also don't know what's so terrible about the dialog either. It wasn't Tarantino....ok? And?


Posted by Wizard_of_Aahs
Member since Jun 2013
148 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:52 pm to
Here is the best article I've read so far that refutes what Durantula and others have been saying regarding the lack of story.

Film Critic Hulk

quote:

WHEN SOME PEOPLE EVALUATE A MOVIE, THEY WANT IT TO CHECK OFF ALL THE BOXES OF RELATIVE GOODNESS IN ORDER TO QUALIFY THAT GOODNESS.


quote:

GRAVITY IS A FILM THAT IS TRYING TO PUT YOU IN A 100% ENVIRONMENTAL AND VISCERAL EXPERIENCE. WE COME INTO A STORY AT A CERTAIN POINT. WE LEAVE IT AT A CERTAIN POINT. IT IS A CONTINUAL NON-STOP EXPERIENCE IN BETWEEN. IT CAN NEVER LET UP FROM THAT. AND THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIENCE IS FOR YOU TO EXPERIENCE SPACE, IN ALL IT'S INFINITE TERROR AND WONDER.


quote:

ANY LITTLE CHARACTER BUILDING NOTES HULK COULD GIVE (AND HULK COULD HAVE A LITANY OF THEM) WOULD SEEM COMPLETELY ANTITHETICAL TO WHAT WAS TRYING TO BE ACHIEVED AT EACH MOMENT IN THAT MOVIE. IT JUST HAS TO STAY ON MESSAGE. IT HAS TO PUT THE EXPERIENCE FIRST. THE BEST WAY TO DO IT IS WITH COMPLETE ECONOMY. HENCE THE EXACT STORY THEY USED. HENCE THE DEAD DAUGHTER. HENCE THE SHORTHAND OF CHARACTERIZATION. HENCE GEORGE CLOONEY BEING THE CALMEST MAN IN THE WORLD. HENCE JUST GOING INTO HER HEAD THAT ONE TIME. HENCE HER REFLECTIONS. HENCE HER TALKING TO HERSELF AND PEPPING HERSELF UP. THESE THINGS ARE ALL BIG OVERT AND ON-THE-NOSE STORY MOTIFS. AND IN A MOVIE LIKE THIS? THEY ARE PRECISELY WHAT WE NEED TO MOVE THROUGH THE BEATS IN THE WAY WE DO. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY THE BEST WAY TO MAKE THIS THRILL RIDE INTO A HUMAN REALITY.


quote:

AND SO WHEN PEOPLE KEEP TALKING ABOUT THE HOW THEY COULD BARELY BREATH DURING THE RUNNING TIME OF GRAVITY AND THEN CHASTISE THE STORY, THEY ARE DEFINITELY MISSING THAT IT WAS THE STORY THAT ALLOWED THEM (OR IN THE VERY LEAST, WASN'T AN OBSTACLE IN ALLOWING THEM) TO HAVE THAT EXPERIENCE.




Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37240 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

ANY LITTLE CHARACTER BUILDING NOTES HULK COULD GIVE (AND HULK COULD HAVE A LITANY OF THEM) WOULD SEEM COMPLETELY ANTITHETICAL TO WHAT WAS TRYING TO BE ACHIEVED AT EACH MOMENT IN THAT MOVIE. IT JUST HAS TO STAY ON MESSAGE. IT HAS TO PUT THE EXPERIENCE FIRST. THE BEST WAY TO DO IT IS WITH COMPLETE ECONOMY. HENCE THE EXACT STORY THEY USED. HENCE THE DEAD DAUGHTER. HENCE THE SHORTHAND OF CHARACTERIZATION. HENCE GEORGE CLOONEY BEING THE CALMEST MAN IN THE WORLD. HENCE JUST GOING INTO HER HEAD THAT ONE TIME. HENCE HER REFLECTIONS. HENCE HER TALKING TO HERSELF AND PEPPING HERSELF UP. THESE THINGS ARE ALL BIG OVERT AND ON-THE-NOSE STORY MOTIFS. AND IN A MOVIE LIKE THIS? THEY ARE PRECISELY WHAT WE NEED TO MOVE THROUGH THE BEATS IN THE WAY WE DO. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY THE BEST WAY TO MAKE THIS THRILL RIDE INTO A HUMAN REALITY.


Story served the purpose, exactly. Which means it is a good story relative to the movie's intentions.
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram