- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Game of Thrones S7 E7 "The Dragon and the Wolf" MAESTERS THREAD NO SPOILERS
Posted on 8/29/17 at 5:50 pm to Bluefin
Posted on 8/29/17 at 5:50 pm to Bluefin
Totally moot point here and SIAP but did anyone else think about Bran saying Jon was a Sand was incorrect even if Jon was a bastard.
I mean, I know Jon was born in Dorne geographically speaking, but it was to a Targaryen and a Stark. So, if he was a bastard he still wouldn't have been Sand right?
I mean, does Dorne follow the natural born law that the US does?

I mean, I know Jon was born in Dorne geographically speaking, but it was to a Targaryen and a Stark. So, if he was a bastard he still wouldn't have been Sand right?
I mean, does Dorne follow the natural born law that the US does?
This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 8/29/17 at 5:55 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I, for one, like to believe Aegon is real.
I think I prefer the Blackfyre theory. But admittedly that's mostly because I like the "Varys is a Blackfyre and he wants to see the son of his sister (also a Blackfyre) and Illyrio on the throne" theory.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 5:58 pm to theGarnetWay
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 3:43 am
Posted on 8/29/17 at 6:48 pm to ohiovol
Im not saying youre wrong but none of that matters once Jon finds out he's the heir. That trumps all kinds of shite. Daenerys is going to be all in as well since he used his valerian Steele on her vagina.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 8:23 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It's really not all that crazy to have a second kid w/the same name.
quote:Leonard and Lanard? Not quite the same, but close....
Save for George Foreman, name one. It seems utterly ridiculous to me naming your kid the same name.
maybe they spelled Jon's name different
Posted on 8/29/17 at 8:29 pm to Scoob
Posted on 8/29/17 at 8:50 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
Daenerys is going to be all in as well
Jon's claim as heir to the throne trumps Danny's. I don't think she's going to like that...at least at first.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 8:55 pm to emanresu
It may not matter, it may depend how Jon plays that card. If they love each other and win the war. Husband and Wife, King and Queen. Both get what they get. However, Jon may not believe it for a while and may not say anything for awhile. This is where Bran, Sam, and it would most certainly have to be Howland Reed need to show proof.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 8:57 pm to CrimsonBoz
Wisecrack summed this shite show up, in case anyone was curious: LINK
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:08 pm to ladytiger118
This season will not age well, imo. They need to bring it next season. It would really suck for this series to end on a sour note when it has been so transcendently great.
This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:11 pm to CrimsonBoz
quote:
t may not matter, it may depend how Jon plays that card. If they love each other and win the war. Husband and Wife, King and Queen.
One will die, book it. My bet is Dany.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:12 pm to LSUminati
Or it could go that way which imo would suck.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:15 pm to ffishstik
quote:
Jon's real name was Aegon because of Dany's vision of Rhaegar in the House of the Undying. He names the kid Aegon, says that he is TPTWP, and says that his is the song of ice and fire. None of that lines up with Elia's Aegon.
Not only that...If Rhaegar annulled his first marriage, he effectively made the first Aegon a bastard. He would want Aegon, TPWWP, to be legitimate.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:19 pm to CrimsonBoz
Could Bran bring Jon into the vision or was that only possible with TER and Bran?
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:23 pm to Green Chili Tiger
I'm struggling with this--- hopefully someone can shed some light.
But how was the others going to get past the wall (that had kept them at bay for all these centuries), if it weren't for the stupid John going capture a Wight plan that never could have worked?
But how was the others going to get past the wall (that had kept them at bay for all these centuries), if it weren't for the stupid John going capture a Wight plan that never could have worked?
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:26 pm to The_Duke
quote:
But how was the others going to get past the wall (that had kept them at bay for all these centuries), if it weren't for the stupid John going capture a Wight plan that never could have worked?
I'm still convinced the mark on Bran's arm had something to do with lessening the magic at the Wall like it did at the cave. The dragon was just the quickest way to tackle that.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:28 pm to KajunKouyon
I'm not sure Kajun, maybe he could ? That may be the only way to prove it to him but everyone else may take Reed.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 9:52 pm to LSUminati
quote:I like them as a power couple, but it sure is setting up for Dany to die.
quote:
t may not matter, it may depend how Jon plays that card. If they love each other and win the war. Husband and Wife, King and Queen.
One will die, book it. My bet is Dany.
This bit of info, if it can be confirmed by some other than Jon's best buddy and his step-brother, (which, realistically, would have to be addressed), puts Jon on the short list of Dany successors. Otherwise, we'd have a potential for a repeat of what happened after Robert died.
Not to suggest I'd go to war, or even oppose Jon, if I were on their alliance, but I might not take Sam and Bran all that seriously. They're not exactly objective sources.
Popular
Back to top


1








