Started By
Message

Finished watching greyhound

Posted on 7/10/20 at 6:56 pm
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42689 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 6:56 pm
It was ok
Very little character development
Talk about some stressful combat On water
Can you imagine 50 straight hours of trying to find u boats with no sleep or break while protecting convoys and making decisions without much intel
Posted by vl100butch
Ridgeland, MS
Member since Sep 2005
34657 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 9:57 pm to
I’m watching it now....totally agree with your description...
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47135 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:00 pm to
Just finished it.

I had, maybe, 2 seconds of screen time,
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25208 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 10:01 pm to
It's completely and utterly inaccurate but hey who gives a frick about getting anything right anymore
Posted by rich4pres
Knoxville
Member since Dec 2016
9777 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 3:07 am to
Is it worth watching?
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25202 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 7:38 am to
quote:

I had, maybe, 2 seconds of screen time,


But they were a pivotal and important 2 seconds. At least that is how you should spin it.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42689 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 8:13 am to
It’s a part of ww2 I had no clue going into
Decent watch
The music score was annoying entire movie
It’s not saving private Ryan or band of brothers but for $50 million budget it’s worth a watch
Posted by vl100butch
Ridgeland, MS
Member since Sep 2005
34657 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:40 am to
I don't know if anyone here will get it, but the little toy destroyer that his girlfriend gave to him in San Francisco...

had a K number on it, not a DD like it should have...

anyone else ever seen Corvette K-225 with Randolph Scott?

the movie was decent enough, lots of tension, but it simply told a story through the eyes of the destroyer captain...

I imagine a decent amount of this was filmed in Baton Rouge on the Kidd...since this destroyer was a 5 gun Fletcher class

Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25365 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:47 am to
Not much character development, but I enjoyed the film. Tom Hanks was awesome as usual. I came away with tremendous respect for everyone involved with getting troops and supplies to Europe.

As far as production - I think the interior bridge shots from the Greyhound were on the USS Kidd (Fletcher Class Destroyer moored in the Baton Rouge harbor, now a museum ship), while the hotel lobby was the Louisiana State Capital building. The Christmas Tree was covering the Louisiana state seal.

quote:

Can you imagine 50 straight hours of trying to find u boats with no sleep or break while protecting convoys and making decisions without much intel


Obviously the stakes were much higher for Destroyer captains and sailors than what most will ever have to deal with....but it’s still a good lesson in leadership and in life - sometimes we have to be comfortable making difficult decisions based limited context or bad information.
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 10:57 am
Posted by HeadChange
Abort gay babies
Member since May 2009
43836 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 2:46 pm to
Entertaining enough. Much better than that turd Midway. Glad it was only 90 mins tho. Worth a watch
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 2:50 pm
Posted by Challenger2006
Member since Mar 2014
166 posts
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:34 pm to
I thought it was fine. Worth watching but not something I’d watch again. I couldn’t help but think about how the entire movie is basically cgi. Then I kept thinking about how difficult it must be to be an actor in that situation.

Posted by ellunchboxo
Gtown
Member since Feb 2009
18800 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 1:14 am to
I thought they filmed the interior scenes on the USS Kidd?

Anyway, I enjoyed it but it felt rushed.
Posted by Frac the world
The Centennial State
Member since Oct 2014
16846 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 9:46 pm to
I would agree with you. It just straight into the action and didn’t relent from 5 mins in to the end.

Character development lacking, which I didn’t mind, it does a great job showing how harrowing it was being in the Navy in WW2 in the North Atlantic.

It reinforced my stance that being in the navy during WW2 would be my least favorite branch. U boats in the middle of the night hunting you and potentially sending you to your grave in 20000 ft of water without ever seeing them? Not thanks. I’d rather charge an MG 42 nest head on, at least I’d see my enemy and die on dry earth. All my respect to those heroes.

Tom Hanks was good, even if he is a pedo.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27375 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 10:19 pm to
Midway on the water.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
18771 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 12:09 am to
quote:

Very little character development


That is good to hear.

Many movies that are based on a great story/concept are ruined when they waste time trying to get us to know and care for the characters.
Posted by Jor Jor The Dinosaur
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2014
6584 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 11:20 am to
I agree, I don't need character development for a movie like this. They're Navy sailors, probably have a wife and kids at home, and just want to complete their mission and get back safe. Just put me in the situation and show me the tension, stress, and courage associated with it.

Worth the watch. It was entertaining, effectively used its runtime, and showed a side of the war that doesn't get much coverage in film.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17139 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Worth the watch. It was entertaining, effectively used its runtime, and showed a side of the war that doesn't get much coverage in film.



watched it twice. Second time gave me a greater appreciation for the captain's faith and how he drew upon it throughout the ordeal.

It's a good military popcorn flick. Pretty accurate as well. Special effects were high quality, you rarely thought they were acting in front of a modified green screen.

It isn't a top 5 WWII movie but certainly has my respect as a quality addition to the genre
Posted by TheGuitarMan1
LA
Member since Jun 2020
309 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 5:46 pm to
I thought these comments summed it up ...

“talk about some stressful combat On water
Can you imagine 50 straight hours of trying to find u boats with no sleep or break while protecting convoys and making decisions without much intel “

“It’s a part of ww2 I had no clue going into ”

“It’s not saving private Ryan ”

“told a story through the eyes of the destroyer captain... ”

“Not much character development, but I enjoyed the film. Tom Hanks was awesome as usual. I came away with tremendous respect for everyone involved with getting troops and supplies to Europe. ”

“I enjoyed it but it felt rushed. ”

“t just straight into the action and didn’t relent from 5 mins in to the end. “

“All my respect to those heroes. ”

“just put me in the situation and show me the tension, stress, and courage associated with it.”

“Special effects were high quality, ”

“It isn't a top 5 WWII movie but certainly has my respect as a quality addition to the genre ”

“Worth a watch ”
Posted by TheGuitarMan1
LA
Member since Jun 2020
309 posts
Posted on 7/13/20 at 5:47 pm to
Good point ...

quote:

Very little character development


That is good to hear.

Many movies that are based on a great story/concept are ruined when they waste time trying to get us to know and care for the characters.
Posted by caddysdad
Member since Oct 2015
275 posts
Posted on 7/14/20 at 11:19 am to
If you want to read a very accurate book about the war in the North Atlantic, read the following. The author was there in the thick of it.

The Cruel Sea
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram