Started By
Message

re: Biggest box office bombs, every year since 1978

Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:59 am to
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
7938 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:59 am to
quote:

2015: Pan


Underrated and not a terrible watch
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33253 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:00 am to
I liked these enough to watch them multiple times on TV.

1997: The Postman
1999: The 13th Warrior
2012: John Carter
2013: 47 Ronin

The scenes from Mulan look good. Is it a good watch?
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58522 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Pluto Nash
holy shite
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9379 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

1983: Krull: $47m/$16.5m :(

I was in high school when this was released but only first saw it on HBO/ cable.

I'm sure Return of the Jedi sucked a lot of the air out of the scifi/ fantasy room but I don't remember any promotion of this film prior to release. And this was a time as a teenager to do all nighters at a friends house playing Dungeon and Dragons; this movie would have been high interest for us.
Posted by sqerty
AP
Member since May 2022
8129 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:36 am to
I think it's almost impossible to really know the actual losses figuring in Hollywood accounting and additional promotional expenditures. I also feel like I've read about quite a few more that bombed harder. Allegedly. Still, nice list. Adams family values is almost better than the original
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40726 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:37 am to
quote:

2002: The Adventures of Pluto Nash: $100m / $7.1m


Holy hell

quote:

2012: John Carter: $263m / $284.1m


Very underrated. Wouldn't have saved it but it was a mistake of them not naming it the same as the book series. John Carter of Mars or Under the Moons of Mars. Just naming the movie John Carter is freaking retarded and just made the movie sound dumb before you even saw a trailer.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
18855 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

1989: Pink Cadillac: $19m / $12.1m


This used to come on HBO all of the time in the early 90's. I'd probably still watch it again
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58892 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

think it's almost impossible to really know the actual losses figuring in Hollywood accounting and additional promotional expenditures. I


Completely agree, which is why these arguments are dumb. No one other than the studio knows anything. I just feel like this topic has gotten out of hand.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14400 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Just naming the movie John Carter is freaking retarded and just made the movie sound dumb before you even saw a trailer.


This trailer is the reason I didn’t watch it. I swear they were playing it before every movie for a damn year before Carter released. By the time it released I skipped it out of spite.

This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 10:52 am
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:50 am to
I liked these ones:

1983: Krull: $47m/$16.5m
1984: The Cotton Club: $58m / $25.9m
1986: Howard the Duck: $37m / $38m (but led to the creation of Pixar)
1988: The Adventures of Baron Munchausen: $46m / $8m
1991: Hudson Hawk: $65m / $17.2m
1999: The 13th Warrior: $160m / $61.7m
2000: Titan A.E.: $75m / $36.8m
2008: Speed Racer: $120m / $93.9m
2012: John Carter: $263m / $284.1m
2017: King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: $175m / $148.7m
2018: Mortal Engines: $100-150m / $83.7m



Others that I've seen but didn't like as much:


1980: Heaven's Gate: $44m / $3.5m
1989: Pink Cadillac: $19m / $12.1m
1995: Cutthroat Island: $98m / $10m
1996: Mary Reilly: $47m / $12.3m
1997: The Postman: $80m / $20.8m
Posted by WaltWhite504
Member since Sep 2021
2108 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

2024: Joker 2: $200m / $207m


How do they decide the top bomb of the year?

Coppola spent $120m on a film like 100 people watched.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63080 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:01 am to
I saw Inchon in the theater with my dad when I was a kid. I liked it.

I can't believe Krull cost that much to make. Someone needs to do an audit of that one.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37625 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 12:27 pm to
I really liked a lot of those.
Mortal Engines was very cool.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5851 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

2021: Chaos Walking: $100m / $27m


Weird one. A 2018 production that had its 2019 release date bumped 18 months into 2021 to accommodate reshoots. Lionsgate gave the film no marketing push and put into enough screens to just technically qualify as a wide release. Seems like they had written off the losses a long time ago.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39014 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

1999: The 13th Warrior: $160m / $61.7m


Of the list....this stands out the most as a non-stinker....in fact, very much the complete opposite.

quote:

2005: Stealth: $135m / $79m






" ‘Stealth’ is a stink-bomb, an offense against taste, intelligence and the noise pollution code." - Roger Ebert
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14400 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Coppola spent $120m on a film like 100 people watched.


It was a masterpiece.

Posted by slutiger5
Parroquias de Florida
Member since May 2007
11823 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:00 pm to
Land of the lost was a pretty funny family flick.
Posted by Kingshakabooboo
Member since Nov 2012
1478 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:19 pm to
There are some damn good movies on this
list.

1983: Krull: Childhood favorite and cult classic
1995: Cutthroat Island: pretty entertaining
1997: The Postman: awesome movie
1999: The 13th Warrior: awesome movie
2000: Titan A.E.: decent animated flick
2007: Evan Almighty: Decent
2009: Land of the Lost: love this one
2012: John Carter: pretty good
2013: 47 Ronin: Not bad- decent movie
2017: King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: Good movie
2018: Mortal Engines: Decent watch
Posted by cbtullis
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2004
6821 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:30 pm to
I’ve only seen 5 of them and 2 of those were in the bold
They were watchable but I get it
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31790 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Hudson Hawk


The first R Rated movie I remember my parents letting me watch. It’s actually quite fun.
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 11:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram