- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/16/09 at 1:40 pm to LSUtigahs28
quote:what i posted has nothing to do with "knowing anything about" surviving but nice try.
When you know anything about survival in the real world you'll realize you just made yourself look like an arse.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:14 pm to Acreboy
quote:
what i posted has nothing to do with "knowing anything about" surviving but nice try.
You really are this ignorant. Let me explain this to you.
You are probably a LSU student or have been a LSU student. That means you've been around the vegetation in the LSU/BR area a pretty good bit. Tell me which of the plants you find around LSU/BR are safe to eat and provide nutrition?
Which are poisonous?
Now imagine yourself stranded in an area where you don't even know the vegetation. Chance of you picking out an edible plant that provides nutrition? Not Good.
What about meat. Do you know how to set a trap? Even if you know how its done, have you ever done it? Do you know where to place the trap? If you are again in an unfamiliar area do you know what size to make the trap? Do you even have the tools and materials to make a trap?
Chances of you being able to trap shite even in an area where you know what is around you are very low.
You know what those two mean? You are going have huge problems with nutrition and nutrition means energy. Energy to continue getting water and the mental clarity to signal in help when it is around you. When you are low on energy you know what is a bad fricking idea? Burning up a metric frickton of energy walking through the wilderness.
Have you ever tried to walk any significant distance over rough terrain? Not a clear forest or a trail, but over the actual terrain is a really unpopulated area? I doubt it. It uses a TON of energy. Energy you can't spare because you don't know what to eat or how to catch something to eat.
Plus how do you know you won't wander farther from safety? You probably don't.
Plus none of this take into account rolled ankles, lack of water, infected cuts, spider bites, scorpion stings, snake bites, or any of the other 400 ways to take your situation from bad to worse when you are blundering through the wilderness without training or adequate energy/focus.
The only time that it would ever make sense to go try to find civilization/safety was if you knew no one was looking for you(highly unlikely) and you had to get there(medical issue).
All in shut the frick up. If you wanna try barehanding a huge cliff while starving without any training be my guest. In the meantime I'll be back near my last known position so the rescuer can get to me in the most timely manner while you are stuck out in BFE with a compound fracture and die because the searchers have no clue where you've wandered off to.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:26 pm to LSUsmartass
Stroud had a damn rifle in one episode. And he always has more gear and stuff to use.
Bear might sleep in a hotel, but he also puts himself in terrible situations just to show how to get out of them.
Man vs. Wild is more about showing you how to survive (with a lot of shock factor), and Survivorman is more about proving he can survive.
Bear might sleep in a hotel, but he also puts himself in terrible situations just to show how to get out of them.
Man vs. Wild is more about showing you how to survive (with a lot of shock factor), and Survivorman is more about proving he can survive.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:28 pm to LSUtigahs28
Why does this debate draw us in every time it comes up? The thread gets started by someone new, then the same motherfrickers argue the same points.
I actually watched survivorman last night looking for something I could use, then I realized how fricking stupid that was and went to bed.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
I actually watched survivorman last night looking for something I could use, then I realized how fricking stupid that was and went to bed.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:39 pm to FearTheHatNotThatCat
quote:
Man vs. Wild is more about showing you how to survive (with a lot of shock factor)
Again no as has been stated before most of the stuff grylls does is completely stupid even for someone trained in survival and the area where he is doing these stunts.
For a layperson out in the wilderness you are more likely to end up dead.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:42 pm to Froman
The main reason I prefer Survivorman is that the guy is out there alone and on his own. If he breaks a bone or gets mauled by an animal there's no one around to come to his aide. Bear could probably survive on the moon but the safety net he brings with him, in having others around, diminishes the show for me.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:43 pm to wilfont
quote:
If he breaks a bone or gets mauled by an animal there's no one around to come to his aide.
Other than the beacon he can activate at a moment's notice to bring his crew and medical professionals to him.
The show's insurance/lawyers wouldn't allow him out there without some sort of safety net.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:48 pm to LSUtigahs28
quote:
Other than the beacon he can activate at a moment's notice to bring his crew and medical professionals to him.
Is that true? I didn't know he carried a beacon. But I guess that would be prudent.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:50 pm to wilfont
quote:
Is that true? I didn't know he carried a beacon. But I guess that would be prudent.
He activated it once in(I think it was the Canada episode where he had the crashed plane) an episode.
Also in the episode in the Sierra NEvada episode that aired last night he mentioned that he left behind his safety gear and specifically mentioned that a broken bone would be a huge problem now because he was totally alone.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:52 pm to Froman
quote:
Why does this debate draw us in every time it comes up? The thread gets started by someone new, then the same motherfrickers argue the same points.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:57 pm to FearTheHatNotThatCat
quote:If Bear had a rifle and Stroud had a rifle, who would "survive" in a fire fight? My money would be on the guy in the special forces.
Stroud had a damn rifle
Posted on 2/16/09 at 2:59 pm to LSUtigahs28
quote:
Too bad the two don't have jack shite to do with one another.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
quote:
Ok? Chances are smacking the fricking thing with a stick and then using a sharp rock to cut its head away is much easier and safer.
Oh I get it....I'm aware that a lot of what Bear does is staged for the ratings.
quote:
quote:
If I need to survive somewhere I would want Bear over Suvivorman no doubt.
Go take a couple of survival courses and then report back on who you prefer.
Sorry bro, I would rather Bear over SM anyday! I suggest you go read up on the British Special Forces training and then you get back to me. Bears knowledge as a whole is far more superior.
seriously though, comparing the 2 is pretty pointless anyways.
-Bear is all about showing how to survive while finding your way out of wherever it is your lost!
-Survivorman's #1 rule to survival is...staying put and learning how to survive until you're rescued.
Both are very wise...thats obvious. I guess my point is Bear Grylls is a bad arse, and Survivorman is a nancy.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 3:02 pm to Mouth
quote:
-scale the side of a cliff bare handed
I have never seen Bear do this either. Watch the video clip I linked when Bear scaled down the side of a cliff and you will see the safety harness he uses, along with the safety guy that hooked everything up
Posted on 2/16/09 at 3:07 pm to Mouth
quote:
Yeah, b/c summiting Everest has nothing to do with survival
It doesn't.
When summiting Everest you have food in cans no fear of wildlife and plenty of water. You also have a tent. I'm not denying it takes great physical fitness and strength of will, but it doesn't help put food in your stomach or keep you from getting bitten by a poisonous insect.
Even if something goes wrong there is a line of camps up and down the mountain, medics, and other people around to help you out.
In the wilderness your biggest challenges are finding food, water and shelter. Not necessarily in that order, which of those does summiting Everest relate to?
quote:
Oh I get it....I'm aware that a lot of what Bear does is staged for the ratings.
Any time you admit that something he does is staged for ratings and potentially dangerous one should never make this claim
quote:
Bear has just as much survival information as survivor man does....
Which you did one page ago.
quote:
-Bear is all about showing how to survive while finding your way out of wherever it is your lost!
Which as I covered area is generally a stupid fricking idea. Even if you wanted to get out doing it bear's way is a stupid way to go about it
quote:
-Survivorman's #1 rule to survival is...staying put and learning how to survive until you're rescued.
Which is mine or your best way to survive an experience like that.
quote:
I suggest you go read up on the British Special Forces training and then you get back to me.
Which is exactly why YOU SHOULD NEVER DO WHAT HE DOES. You haven't been trained in the same shite he has, you don't have his experience. Trying to emulate him because he's a badass is dumb because we are NOT badasses.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 3:12 pm to LSUtigahs28
I think you guys are arguing different points. Bear Grylls could literally kill Survivorman with or without weapons, but Survivorman's show is more practical for the viewer to use his techniques.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 3:14 pm to FearTheHatNotThatCat
quote:
Stroud had a damn rifle in one episode. And he always has more gear and stuff to use.
because he was in polar bear country. He noted in that episode that he was forced to carry the rifle and that it would only be used in case of an emergency encounter with a polar bear. It's not like he went out hunting with it.
I thought Survivorman was intended to show how you can survive a catastrophe using what you might find in the catastrophe (For example, in the Arctic one where he carries the rifle, the idea is that he is out on a snowmobile miles from the village and it breaks down, and he shows how you can survive until you are found, so he uses parts of the snowmobile, which anyone would do in that position)and whats in nature.
Man v Wild seems to be more of a sensationalized show, and they tell you that up front.
Survivorman just seems like a more informative show than thrill based.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 4:04 pm to badams22
Survivor Man spends a week in the wild with locals and they show him how to survive, then goes back for a week by himself.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 4:36 pm to wilfont
quote:
The main reason I prefer Survivorman is that the guy is out there alone and on his own. If he breaks a bone or gets mauled by an animal there's no one around to come to his aide. Bear could probably survive on the moon but the safety net he brings with him, in having others around, diminishes the show for me.
1.) He has a contract with Discovery. You protect your investment.
2.) Les doesn't need a safety crew because he doesn't do shite but cry and whine.
Posted on 2/16/09 at 4:41 pm to LSUtigahs28
quote:
Any time you admit that something he does is staged for ratings and potentially dangerous one should never make this claim
staged or not, it doesn't change the fact that he does what he does. He just sets the situation up first, and does everything the hard way.
quote:
Even if something goes wrong there is a line of camps up and down the mountain, medics, and other people around to help you out.
Of course there is help b/c Everest is one of the toughest and most dangerous challenges one can attempt. Even with all the help people are dying on Everest every year.
Summiting Everest is way harder than catching food and building a shelter. You or I have a better chance of surviving in the wilderness than we do trying to climb Everest.
quote:
In the wilderness your biggest challenges are finding food, water and shelter. Not necessarily in that order, which of those does summiting Everest relate to?
Bear already knows how to find food and shelter! The son of a bitch will eat anything thats edible, and always has a quality shelter.
If he wanted, Bear could kill the snake with a rock, then skin it, and cook it over fire. But you have to admit when he see's a snake and just grabs that bitch, bites its fricking head off, and eats it...thats just badass.
quote:
Which is exactly why YOU SHOULD NEVER DO WHAT HE DOES. You haven't been trained in the same shite he has, you don't have his experience. Trying to emulate him because he's a badass is dumb because we are NOT badasses.
Dude, I hope one would have enough common sense not to emulate the dangerous stuff he does for the camera like scale cliffs...and I'm pretty sure the average person would probably use a rock when killing snakes for dinner.
The point is, Bear still teaches you about the surroundings, the best way to eat, make shelter ect. ect just like Survivorman. He just adds the crazy shite b/c he IS capable, and its what seperates his show from the others. I just think that with his level of training and accomplishments, that Bear is better suited for all types of survival.
Basically, I pretty much choose Bear b/c he kills rabbits with sticks, and eats leftover Zebra while the Lions watch...instead of some guy carving a stick and playing with a video camera!
This post was edited on 2/16/09 at 4:43 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)