Started By
Message

re: AI will destroy Hollywood gatekeeping

Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7230 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Is that why Jake Paul is famous? Your statement lacks credence.


Reality TV isn't my cup of tea either, but are you going to say it isn't a successful genre?

quote:

Wait until "IP" includes the face of one of your children and no one has passed anything to prevent it or punish people for doing it.


I don't even know what this means. If it was within the US, and someone was selling it, you could definitely go after it. If it's outside the US, especially from China or Russia, I already couldn't go after them so I'm not sure what the difference would be?

quote:

Okay? Less money going into the economy. Just ask Georgia how much they've benefitted financially for incentivizing shows and movies to be made there.


The amount of money doesn't change because movies exist. Money will get spent regardless, just in different places.

quote:

Whooptie-shite.


Ok? I'd be excited to watch a better ending.

quote:

It's not "amazing". Yes, it will likely change the industry, but not in a positive way. Imagine a world where the next John Williams or Hans Zimmer is slinging fries because everyone thought AI music was "just as good." Consider that as well - movies won't be the only thing that gets pushed aside by corporations wanting to not have to pay people. Music is definitely on that list as well.


The technology is definitely amazing. The atom bomb is amazing. Just because it's destructive doesn't mean it isn't amazing. You're getting super upset. I imagine you're close to TV industry and you know you might not have a job much longer.

quote:

This is a weird take considering your opinion is based on the actions and opinions of maybe a percentage of a percentage. SAG has over 170,000 registered members - and you're wanting them all to lose their jobs because of a few dozen got in front of people at an awards show and said things you didn't like?


How many of those SAG members make all their money from the industry? A ton hold down other jobs to act. They won't be losing the bulk of their income.

quote:

Do you apply this level of "scorched earth" to every profession? Do you think every waiter should be fired because one was rude to you? Every mechanic let go because screwed up the repair on your car?


There's a big difference there, and you know it. The restaurant and mechanic industry isn't controlled by 5 major studios.

Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33814 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Entertainment won’t be one movie for millions anymore.

It will be films generated per viewer.

Language, tone, pacing, even narrative choices adapted to individual taste.


quote:

This reminds me of Fahrenheit 451.
I reminds me of Josh Baskin's electronic comic book in Big (1988)
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63323 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by Michael T. Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2004
8877 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 8:10 pm to
I’m honestly looking forward to a Star Wars trilogy based on the Timothy Zahn Heir to the Empire storyline.

Also, we’re going to get DC/Marvel crossovers, James Bond period films, and Indiana Jones adventures.

There’s going to be a lot of crap, but there’s already a lot of crap. Might as well get to see things I want without conglomerates making asinine decisions.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35348 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Reality TV isn't my cup of tea either, but are you going to say it isn't a successful genre?


You said "good" would rise to the top; the fact that reality TV has been successful is not a positive spin on your argument.

quote:

I don't even know what this means. If it was within the US, and someone was selling it, you could definitely go after it. If it's outside the US, especially from China or Russia, I already couldn't go after them so I'm not sure what the difference would be?


You implied that IP battles are lost causes; my point is that's a step closer to your personal image no longer being that, including your kids'.

quote:

The amount of money doesn't change because movies exist. Money will get spent regardless, just in different places.


That's... not how that works. Data centers don't produce as many jobs as a full movie production, and movie productions require a much more diverse set of skills.

quote:

Ok? I'd be excited to watch a better ending.


Well, that makes obliterating the entire industry worth it.

quote:

The technology is definitely amazing. The atom bomb is amazing. Just because it's destructive doesn't mean it isn't amazing. You're getting super upset. I imagine you're close to TV industry and you know you might not have a job much longer.


I work in IT and have a much better understanding of the failings of AI than you do. Nice try though... C-.

quote:

How many of those SAG members make all their money from the industry? A ton hold down other jobs to act. They won't be losing the bulk of their income.


And how many do?

quote:

There's a big difference there, and you know it. The restaurant and mechanic industry isn't controlled by 5 major studios.


That still doesn't justify putting hundreds of thousands of people out of work just because you have a mad-on for the major studios.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35348 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 8:48 pm to
That looks more akin to a Bollywood movie in terms of effects.
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
9167 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:23 pm to
It will be funny to see them echo this meme.

Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71068 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26407 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:06 pm to
It's getting there. That Coke commercial with all of the snow and semi-Coke trucks was AI.

I've seen photoreal animations that would take me a week or two just to model and rig in 3d that AI does in a few minutes. It will take over media as soon as they overcome the "herding cats" problem with consistency and continuity.

The old production model of development, financing and distribution will be replaced by development, AI and directly to streaming.

This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 6:08 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63323 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:30 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

The series "Jon Snow" titled The Crow
Its events take place 25 years after the Game of Thrones.

This is the worst it’ll be and will only improve from here
This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 6:35 pm
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7230 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 7:27 pm to
See thats what I'm expecting as time goes on. Almost all the crap people are saying about AI not being as good as a human director and actors is silly. First, there will be a lot of crap obviousy, but theres also a lot of crappy tv shows and local plays most people don't watch either. When you get good, talented people, which I think at this point is just a few months away, you'd be able to produce a move in a few days that would have taken months on a budget of less than 1k vs 300 million. And guess what? People will want to watch it if you capture their attention.

None of the people worried about losing their jobs actually care about progress, they only want to complain because it affects them. No one in their right mind would want to keep around people from the equestrian industry at the advent of cars just because they feel bad that they lost their jobs. The future is here. Quit fighting it, you'll only get yourself behind. Pivot now in the new industry and get ahead of the curve so you can be one of the ones who will have a job in entertainment in the future.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6111 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

progress


Computer generated wish fulfillment is not progress.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7230 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Computer generated wish fulfillment is not progress.


Oh God you people are insufferable. AI isn't progress? We've literally been talking about this in Sci Fi circles for almost 100 years. We've been progressing toward this period for a long time. Sorry it caught you off guard.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122517 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 6:15 am to
Tell him. This is how we win and return Hollywood over to like minded patriots.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6111 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

We've literally been talking about this in Sci Fi circles for almost 100 years.


You didn't read those books too close, I guess.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35348 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

None of the people worried about losing their jobs actually care about progress, they only want to complain because it affects them


So all those people with jobs in natural gas and coal should STFU when a nuclear plant or solar farm is built nearby?
Posted by Josh Fenderman
Ron Don Volante's PlayPen
Member since Jul 2011
7041 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 10:37 pm to
So all those horse and buggy drivers should stfu when the ford plant is built nearby?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35348 posts
Posted on 2/19/26 at 12:32 am to
quote:

So all those horse and buggy drivers should stfu when the ford plant is built nearby?


What point are you trying to make, exactly?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35348 posts
Posted on 2/19/26 at 12:38 am to
quote:

AI isn't progress?


Sometimes, sure.

When AI is used to discover cancer cells years earlier, or determining the optimal way to plan streets to prevent accidents, or to locate missing people.

Everyone, though, applies it to art and moves simply because they hate the people making it. Because it was a lot easier to let someone else learn the skills, then someone else write the code to learn from those people, instead of putting in any of the work themselves. AI isn’t some godsend to free Hollywood from wokeness; it is the ultimate form of fat, lazy, soulless creation. A world where great composers and incredible cinematographers are never seen again.

Political ideologies are cyclical. We happen to live in a time where awareness are turned up to 11 but eventually it will reach an equilibrium. When that time comes will you be happy you destroyed the industry because someone made movies you didn’t like?

Or ask yourself this… would you be okay if AI had taken over 50 years ago?
Posted by Josh Fenderman
Ron Don Volante's PlayPen
Member since Jul 2011
7041 posts
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

What point are you trying to make, exactly?

That your argument is fricking dumb.

More efficient, cheaper technologies come along all the time. It’s the same thing with AI just to a much higher degree. Are we all supposed to forego a cheaper more efficient energy source because there’s still coal and people can mine it and have jobs?

The thing about AI it seems people don’t understand is it’s here and progressing at breakneck speed. I realize some of you would like the government to put regulations on it so people can keep their jobs, but do you think China is going to do that as well? Whatever country decides to do that is screwing themselves over.

When China is sending their kung fu robots over here to beat our asses and turn us into AI food, I hope you can be satisfied in your moral victory that we didn’t put Hollywood out of their jobs
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram