Started By
Message

A Killer Story (New HBO True Crime Documentary)

Posted on 9/17/26 at 2:07 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 2:07 pm
This one is wild. Only one of three episodes out so far, I think EP2 drops tonight. But gave this a go last night and man it's pretty wild.

I remember this murder story from the 48 hours that is referenced in the show. Never remember hearing anything about it after until now.

The husband and wife and the investigative journalist are awesome.

If you're a true crime fan I'd definitely give it a watch. Short 40 minute episodes.
Posted by Nonc Chu Rouge
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2020
159 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 10:13 am to
I just watched it. It’s really good so far. I can’t wait for the next episode. The husband and wife team are awesome but they’re going to be really shook up if/when she’s found guilty. They have a lot invested into her innocence.
This post was edited on 9/20/26 at 10:17 am
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The husband and wife team are awesome but they’re going to be really shook up if/when she’s found guilty. They have a lot invested into her innocence


Yea they are genuinely good people and clearly a lot smarter than the first 20 minutes of the first episode led you to believe. Love that he still refers to them as pen pal and trash man throughout episode 2

I couldn’t tell if they said they had already sold that 500 acres of family land or they were just planning on selling it. I was just thinking in my head please for the love of god do not sell that land to support this case. It’d be different if this was your brother or sister you were defending but selling all that beautiful land to pay for a strangers case. No way.
Posted by TheBoogeyman
Covington
Member since Apr 2020
363 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 4:46 pm to
Pen Pal crying like she did talking about the ex wife sent up some red flags
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:20 am to
Yea that was a "Uh o this woman probably can't look at this through an unbiased lens" moment.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
7060 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:04 am to
The end of episode 2 is a humdinger!!!
Posted by GoldenSombrero
Member since Sep 2010
2926 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:11 am to
From the 48 hours and/or Dateline episodes on this case, it seemed pretty certain she was guilty. Nothing in this doc hasn’t changed that, just showing some police and prosecutorial misconduct.

The gas cans and over 24 hour period her phone was off are extremely coincidental with the timing of the shooting. Unless the defense could show that turning her phone off and driving thru remote mountains was a normal thing she did.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Nothing in this doc hasn’t changed that, just showing some police and prosecutorial misconduct.



IMO that alone is enough that she should be out of prison while awaiting the next trial. Not saying she didn't do it, but that was seriously messed up.

quote:

The gas cans and over 24 hour period her phone was off are extremely coincidental with the timing of the shooting. Unless the defense could show that turning her phone off and driving thru remote mountains was a normal thing she did.


I was curious about the gas cans. Had they been filled up and were now empty? Would those 10 gallons allow her to drive 700+ miles without stopping? Im sure the older 48 Hours talked about it but I was just curious.

But I'd also argue that not being able to prove that someone had ever shot or owned a gun that did the killing and not even to place the person in the state, much less the same town is something that needs to be proven without a doubt above her turning her phone off.

Like the first DA that never prosecuted her said, what is the means and opportunity? No way to prove that without even know if she owned/shot the gun or was even in the city. That's giving them the benefit of the doubt with motive.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
7060 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:28 pm to
Has everyone seen the end of episode 2 where the ex-husbands neighbor is a new surprise witness?
Posted by financetiger
Member since Feb 2008
1895 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:37 pm to
Yes and that was crazy! I went ahead and looked the case up so I know how it ends. I feel sorry for the couple who invested so much time.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:45 pm to
Well you could have left that last sentence off for those of us that haven’t looked it up
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5568 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Pen Pal crying like she did talking about the ex wife sent up some red flags


I think when this thing wraps up we're going to realize it's more of a documentary about unhealthy obsession and crawling down rabbit holes than it is a generic true crime 'murder in the heartland' show that gets spit out all of the time.

The way it opened was a pretty big clue - it didn't talk about a chilling murder or a crime scene that shocked the local community. It talked about a crazy woman sending thousands of emails to a random New York journalist.

Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
23403 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:41 am to
quote:

The gas cans and over 24 hour period her phone was off are extremely coincidental with the timing of the shooting.


She bought two 5 gallon gas cans, so she would have had an extra 10 gallons of gas. I don't know what kind of car she drove, but I doubt an extra 10 gallons of gas was enough to get her there and back without stopping. And her phone being turned off might seem odd today, but back then it was likely a pretty normal practice. Remember, this is well before smart phones and the constant connection. Most people only had cell phones for emergencies. My grandfather had a flip phone that he only turned on if he needed to call someone and he wasn't at his house.

If she really did go camping like she said, the gas cans and cell phone being turned off makes sense. 10 gallons of gas would have been enough to get her out of a difficult situation if she found herself stranded or something, and turning her cell phone off to conserve battery makes sense.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43948 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:53 am to
quote:

If she really did go camping like she said, the gas cans and cell phone being turned off makes sense. 10 gallons of gas would have been enough to get her out of a difficult situation if she found herself stranded or something, and turning her cell phone off to conserve battery makes sense.


Kind of what I was thinking. Not sure if they ever proved that she even filled the gas cans up or not but even if she did it would seem more practical for a camping road trip than one that wouldn't even provide enough gas to help get her all the way back from Kansas.

The guys post earlier spoiling the ending tells me she gets found guilty but there is way too many things that cause reasonable doubt. She might have done it I don't know, but there's certainly not enough evidence and plenty of reasonable doubt to keep her out of jail. I'm sorry if you can't prove that she had the murder weapon or even able to shoot a gun for that matter or even put her in the STATE at the time, you can't convict someone of murder.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 3:18 pm
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
23403 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:20 pm to
Not only that, but there is a hair that is singed into one of the shell casings that does not belong to either of the victims, Dana, or the SIL. How does an unknown hair get singed to the shell casings without that person being involved?
Posted by PillPusher
Gulf Coast
Member since Oct 2009
5961 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I went ahead and looked the case up so I know how it ends. I feel sorry for the couple who invested so much time.


Bruh
Posted by GeauxldMember
Member since Nov 2003
5846 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

She might have done it I don't know, but there's certainly not enough evidence and plenty of reasonable doubt to keep her out of jail.


In fairness, like most of these shows, I doubt they’ve given you a full look at all the evidence presented in the trial(s). Hell, there are still plenty people out there who legitimately believe Steven Avery was railroaded.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5568 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

'm sorry if you can't prove that she had the murder weapon or even able to shoot a gun for that matter or even put her in the STATE at the time, you can't convict someone of murder.


From what I understand, the documentary is painting her in a favorable light. They kind of glossed over the fact that she repeatedly called the victims, harassed them and threatened to kill them and that she openly talked about killing them one day in front of other witnesses, including her friends and children.

As far as the phone being turned off for 24 hours, that had only happened twice in the previous year - once during the weekend of the murder and a few months before when she allegedly broke into the home of the ex. They were able to place her in the state that weekend and she told her friend that she drove all the way there and broke in.

The gas cannisters could have helped her establish her alibi (I was camping in the wilderness and didn't want to run out of gas). But instead she lied about them - said she didn't buy them, then said she bought them for a friend, then said she bought them for someone in AA whose name she doesn't know even though every AA meeting starts with people standing up and saying "Hi, I'm Jane Doe and I'm an alcoholic".

Her alibi is also problematic. For starters, "I was camping by myself in remote areas" is always going to be a suspicious excuse. But OK, she's a flaky single person living in Colorado so maybe. But then she gave conflicting statements about where she went and the routes she took. Not surprisingly, nothing about any of her alibi statements could be verified.

The gun is more interesting. No records of her owning or attempting to purchase firearms. But the documentary is again disingenuous. They strongly implied - via crazy married couple - that the victims were killed with an Uzi (not a gun that is easy to obtain or operate for a novice). But there's no evidence it was an Uzi. They ammo was manufactured by the Israeli company that also manufactures the Uzi weapon, which fires 9mm. But that 9mm ammo can also be used in any 9mm handgun or weapon and 9mms are the most common gun.

The bottom line is this is a batshit crazy woman who almost certainly did it. The lack of a "smoking gun" or hard forensic evidence placing her at the crime scene makes prosecution more challenging, but not impossible. Plenty of convictions are secured on nothing but circumstantial evidence. But if someone wants to qualify that as reasonable doubt under the standards, I wont put up a fight. Especially considering the original investigator and prosecutor did some ethically shady stuff.
Posted by carrguitar
Member since Oct 2014
1021 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:13 pm to
Pen Pal and Trash Man lost me over the course of this doc. Started off appearing as fervent seekers of justice, but the slow reveal of their own personal squabbles with people clouding their judgement and the sanctimonious stances when their foundations got rocked…get lost.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24749 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

They strongly implied - via crazy married couple - that the victims were killed with an Uzi (not a gun that is easy to obtain or operate for a novice). But there's no evidence it was an Uzi.

I just finished the series and I kept asking myself how they knew it was an Uzi. I thought that I must have missed the part where they explained that the police had somehow found the murder weapon. Even went back to watch episode 1 to see if I missed it.

Nope. Just 9mm casings at the scene. They just assumed it was an Uzi because, as you said, same manufacturer...AND the fact they had a vendetta against that prosecutor and the dude they were positive that his DNA would be in that hair.

Those two are straight Karens with nothing better to do than stir shite up. The wife is all over the place emotionally. The part where the director was asking her what she thought about Dana having multiple stories for her alibi and she didn't wanna discuss that. Then he is like "Well, you can't really have it that way 'Mrs Champion-of-Truth'..." That was pretty funny.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram