Started By
Message

Would you rather Marcus Freeman or Billy Napier as your head coach?

Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:28 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:28 pm
Odds are at least one of these guys will be a flop. Who would you bet on if it was your school?

Billy has head coaching experience but if you look at it, the hot g5 coach misses a good bit more often than they hit when stepping up to p5.

Freeman could be the next Aranda, but more often these hot coordinators end up like Will Muschamp.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted by Dubosed
Gulf Breeze
Member since Nov 2012
7055 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:30 pm to
Notre Dame for a first time head coach? It's not gonna go well.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36221 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:31 pm to
I don’t have high hopes for either. But I am a Notre Dame fan so I hope Freeman works out.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60184 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:32 pm to
I think the upside is higher with Freeman. ND has been recruiting off the charts in his first full cycle and I feel like young promising OCs are in constant supply these days to pair with him.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

if you look at it, the hot g5 coach misses a good bit more often than they hit when stepping up to p5.


so do first time head coaches at major programs. Head coaching hires, in general, miss more than they hit big

I think it's close to a push as to who I'd rather have, but I think I'd give the tie-breaker to Freeman for now as he, so far, has recruited circles around Napier. Honestly, they're completely different types of coaches so it's hard to say.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:52 pm
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44893 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:40 pm to
Napier. I think Notre Dame fricked up by not hiring Luke Fickell and they will have to ask him nicely again 4 years from now.
Posted by WMTigerFAN
Ouachita
Member since Feb 2005
4477 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:42 pm to
Only One has successful head coaching experience and been to bowl games, and worked under some really good coaches at some really good programs. That one is the one to bet on. The other may wind up a superstar but lots of big recruiters have failed as head coaches.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

so do first time head coaches at major programs. Head coaching hires, in general, miss more than they hit big


It worked at Ohio State, Oklahoma, and Georgia, among others.

Head coaching hires in general miss more than hit.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89886 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:44 pm to
Freeman.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120329 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

I think Notre Dame fricked up by not hiring Luke Fickell and they will have to ask him nicely again 4 years from now.


Agree but they would have been crucified by the media if they passed on Freeman

That being said Freeman wasnt a bad hire, Fickell just feels like a possible top 5 head coach
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

and worked under some really good coaches at some really good programs

Freeman has coached under Jim Tressell at OSU, Luke Fickell at Cincinnati, and Brian Kelly at Notre Dame. Napier coached under Dabo early in Dabo's career and under Saban. I'd call that a push regarding them coaching under good coaches at good programs.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:50 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

It worked at Ohio State, Oklahoma, and Georgia, among others.

Head coaching hires in general miss more than hit.

So you're agreeing with me?
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
11721 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:51 pm to
ND should go 9-3 this year, losing to OSU, splitting Clemson and USC, then one upset (UNC or BYU is my guess). If Freeman can hold it together after OSU week 1 and actually finishes 9-3 or better then he has a chance to long term be successful. If the wheels come off early in the season he is toast. Blowing the lead against Okie State will haunt him.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

If the wheels come off early in the season he is toast.

That's going to be really unlikely with their schedule. After OSU to open the season, they have Marshall, Cal, UNC, BYU, Stanford, UNLV, and Syracuse. I'd be pretty floored if Notre Dame started the season worse than 6-2 (and honestly expect them to start 7-1), and I really have a hard time seeing them go worse than 8-4 overall.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:55 pm
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139848 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:54 pm to
Napier because he at least has been a Head Coach, Freeman seemed like a rush hire to keep the staff from bolting to LSU
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13467 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:58 pm to
I think Napier, while he has more experience, is more in over his head. Freeman is a great DC, elite recruiter, and they grow modern OCs on trees these days.

Napier seems like he's going to micromanage and overthink his way out of a job. Georgia winning a title and Miami turning their machine around has turned the heat up to 10000 degrees in Gainesville too.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

So you're agreeing with me?


I'm saying all hires, regardless of previous experience, are usually not great, and miss more than hit.

Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Miami turning their machine around

again? Didn't they just fire another head coach last year? I don't think anyone can say they've turned their machine around until they actually start having good football seasons at least two years in a row. And they haven't done that in 20 years. They've had one lone 10 win season since 2003. Maybe Cristobal will be that guy. But that state is still wide open for any of Florida, FSU, or Miami to take over.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64789 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

I'm saying all hires, regardless of previous experience, are usually not great, and miss more than hit.

I literally said the same exact thing in the post you quoted. Like almost word for word

My post
quote:

Head coaching hires, in general, miss more than they hit big


Your post
quote:

Head coaching hires in general miss more than hit.


So we are in agreement, no?
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 2:17 pm
Posted by lsufb1912
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2021
5965 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Notre Dame for a first time head coach? It's not gonna go well.


compared to Florida who plays in the SEC? & opens the season against Utah?

To be fair, it is a good question. Outside of 2 games, Notre Dame has a very cupcake schedule. I can tell you they have no business being ranked #5 with a first year coach. I think Florida will have a more difficult year with a first time head coach, but that doesn't mean Freeman is better.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram