- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Worst QB to ever have 2 rings as a starter?
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:26 am to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:26 am to H-Town Tiger
I was only joking.....but
The Steelers weren't guaranteed a #1 seed "if healthy". And I wonder what in the world Tebow had to do with the Steelers not making it to the SB.....
The Steelers weren't guaranteed a #1 seed "if healthy". And I wonder what in the world Tebow had to do with the Steelers not making it to the SB.....
1
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:27 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
Doesn't Griese only have one ring as a Starter?
SB 7 and SB 8. They beat the skins 14-7 and then beat the Vikes the next year 24-7.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:28 am to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
You know you're a fluke when the only time you have won a playoff game was during 2 fluke superbowl runs.
Ridiculous statement. Winning 3 playoff games in a row just to get to the 2 SBs...yep, all fluke.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:30 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
anything can happen in one game, though of course back up punt returns muffing 2 punts are regular occurances, not flukes
And while we're talking about flukes, I don't think that Brady's Pats beat the Panthers that year if Kasay's kickoff stays in bounds...
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:31 am to Kracka
quote:
Also this is a question I have been dying to ask to all of you who hate Big Ben and Eli. Why is it the norm to say a player has a better team around him to discredit a Quarterback who wins in the post season?
I don't hate Big Ben. Much like Tebow, I hate the narrative that is built up around him.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:31 am to Kracka
quote:
Also this is a question I have been dying to ask to all of you who hate Big Ben and Eli. Why is it the norm to say a player has a better team around him to discredit a Quarterback who wins in the post season? I mean yall say how any quarterback could be on the Giants and win a SB. To me it's just that you guys can't handle the fact that Eli and Big Ben are Elite QB's who produce on the biggest stage. And so what if they have a subpar superbowl or playoff game.
Why are you bunching Ben with Eli. Ben is actually a good QB and has the #s to back it up. Eli has a career 82 QB rating.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:33 am to Kracka
quote:
How is it a fluke getting to the Super Bowl?
going from 6-6, to 7-7 to making the playoffs is the fluke. Winning a playoff game on 2 muffed punts, one of whihc bounced up and hita guy in the knee is not the norm either.
quote:
I have been dying to ask to all of you who hate Big Ben and Eli
I'm not sure who hates these guys, I don't, but I'll try and answer.
quote:
Why is it the norm to say a player has a better team around him to discredit a Quarterback who wins in the post season?
Its not to discredit the QB, its to discredit the people that insist on saying the QB "won" the game. It takes a team to win. Think Eli would be holding the trophy if he played for Washington or the Rams? No chance. Now, would those teams have ben better with him? probably so.
quote:
To me it's just that you guys can't handle the fact that Eli and Big Ben are Elite QB's who produce on the biggest stage. And so what if they have a subpar superbowl or playoff game.
so you admit the whole false argument that people "hate" Eli or Ben is your own strawman, good for you.
I don't know how you define elite, but to meEli and Ben are very good QB's, just below Brady, Rodgers, Brees and Peyton, nothing wrong with that.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:33 am to dukke v
For some reason, I though Morrell started one of those Superbowls.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:36 am to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
The Steelers weren't guaranteed a #1 seed "if healthy
Nothing is guarentted, but all they needed was 1 more win. I don't know if they beat SF if he was healthy, but he clearly was not when they played.
quote:
And I wonder what in the world Tebow had to do with the Steelers not making it to the SB.....
He had a good game when the Broncos beat them, nothing more, nothing less.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:36 am to Sophandros
quote:
And while we're talking about flukes, I don't think that Brady's Pats beat the Panthers that year if Kasay's kickoff stays in bounds...
And two years before that...Tuck Rule?
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:37 am to VerlanderBEAST
Jim Kelly is an 84. Marino is an 86.
You think Ben is better than those guys?
Big Ben's rating is roughly the same as Joe Montana's. Do you think they are equivalent?
You think Ben is better than those guys?
Big Ben's rating is roughly the same as Joe Montana's. Do you think they are equivalent?
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:37 am to Sophandros
quote:
And while we're talking about flukes, I don't think that Brady's Pats beat the Panthers that year if Kasay's kickoff stays in bounds...
maybe not, they also don't beat Oakland with out some biazzare tuck rule or make the SB with out Drew Bledsoe.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:39 am to Sophandros
quote:
Yeah, who the frick names their children after Biblical figures?
David
Michael
Seth
Should I continue?
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:40 am to ragincajun03
quote:
And two years before that...Tuck Rule?
Yep.
I'm really enjoying the Giants' win last night on so many levels.
Now, the Patriots' point differential in their SB appearances is a mere +2.
A Manning is "clutch". Again.
And thanks to this thread, two of those wins by the Pats can be considered "flukes".
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:41 am to glassman
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:56 am to Sophandros
quote:
two of those wins by the Pats can be considered "flukes
I don't really like the word fluke, but not sure what else to say.
I'm just glad something brought the Pats down to earth a bit, when they won 3 of 4 people were over reacting and comparing them to the 49ers and Cowboys.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 11:59 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
I don't really like the word fluke, but not sure what else to say.
Same here.
quote:
I'm just glad something brought the Pats down to earth a bit, when they won 3 of 4 people were over reacting and comparing them to the 49ers and Cowboys.
Yep. And don't forget the smug fans and media. No more of this, "Only the Patriots would do this 'whacky', out of the box thing and win..." (when that thing is actually pretty common among NFL teams...).
Posted on 2/6/12 at 12:01 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Jim Kelly is an 84. Marino is an 86.
You think Ben is better than those guys?
sadly, I think he might
Posted on 2/6/12 at 12:01 pm to Sophandros
How come Eli isn't IIII ??
And I find it funny his middle name is his Momma's maiden name. He comes across as a huge Momma's boy, and he looks like a Nelson.
And I find it funny his middle name is his Momma's maiden name. He comes across as a huge Momma's boy, and he looks like a Nelson.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 12:05 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
How come Eli isn't IIII ??
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News