
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
With a few exceptions I think the transfer portal is
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:27 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:27 am
Like a yard sale buying someone else's junk.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:32 am to ELTIGRE55
Depends on the situation- a guy like Seaton is great, you also have ones like Coleman that are beast but went to a down p4 school.
Jones is a pretty good yard sale find and so is Ty benefield
Jones is a pretty good yard sale find and so is Ty benefield
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:41 am to Big4SALTbro
But besides Jones the rest of the rb's bought are trash, besides Seaton the rest of OL bought are trash, besides Harris rest of WR's bought are trash, TE's bought trash hit on defense more than anything .
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:48 am to ELTIGRE55
Moore is usually pretty good.
Harris has been good, Wilson and Winnie have their spot.
I agree on the rest of the oline they haven’t been good.
Our biggest problem was how drained BK left the offense, even with our funding if you need 9 oline and 9 WRs, you can’t unload the bank on the top.
It’s why the best ratio will be 20 recruits and about 20-25 portal guys, spend big money to plug holes and then the other 10-15 can be diamond in the rough.
Harris has been good, Wilson and Winnie have their spot.
I agree on the rest of the oline they haven’t been good.
Our biggest problem was how drained BK left the offense, even with our funding if you need 9 oline and 9 WRs, you can’t unload the bank on the top.
It’s why the best ratio will be 20 recruits and about 20-25 portal guys, spend big money to plug holes and then the other 10-15 can be diamond in the rough.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:55 am to Big4SALTbro
Jones is pretty good,, but he's no Faulk Fournette, Guice, Hill,,or Helaire. What it takes to win championships .
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:00 am to Big4SALTbro
Wilson and Winnie are 2nd string wide receivers at Alabama and Georgia .
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:03 am to ELTIGRE55
I don’t disagree Jones isn’t a guice, buga, Faulk
He might be closer CEH but just not as fast. He still has had some nice flashes.
I have a feeling we will see us spend big at LT, LG,RG next year, perhaps we grab a top back and big WR.
The good news is the qb room should be good.
We had a lot of holes to fix year 1. UGA fricked us a bit by choking to ole miss. If they beat ole miss we probably have more of their guys giving us a nice core of guys that had been in Lanes system.
I won’t be surprised to see year 2 improve and year 3 is the payoff year.
I just don’t see the sec being a recipe for quick 1 year turn arounds especially if your roster is terrible like ours was.
You can see how bad our roster was by how our transfer outs are doing.
He might be closer CEH but just not as fast. He still has had some nice flashes.
I have a feeling we will see us spend big at LT, LG,RG next year, perhaps we grab a top back and big WR.
The good news is the qb room should be good.
We had a lot of holes to fix year 1. UGA fricked us a bit by choking to ole miss. If they beat ole miss we probably have more of their guys giving us a nice core of guys that had been in Lanes system.
I won’t be surprised to see year 2 improve and year 3 is the payoff year.
I just don’t see the sec being a recipe for quick 1 year turn arounds especially if your roster is terrible like ours was.
You can see how bad our roster was by how our transfer outs are doing.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:06 am to ELTIGRE55
Wilson and Winnie are good slot and gadget guys, they would make a top team even better.
They are not outside big play WRs.
Lane had much different WRs at ole miss than what we have right now. Going forward we should have big outside beast
They are not outside big play WRs.
Lane had much different WRs at ole miss than what we have right now. Going forward we should have big outside beast
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:35 am to ELTIGRE55
"Outside of these dozen or so players we got who are good from the portal, everyone is trash" 
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:44 am to thunderbird1100
To be fair when 1,000 plus guys are in there will be a lot of trash around.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:56 am to ELTIGRE55
It's a free agent market. Your opinion is based only on what you see publicly in the portal. The reality is that players WHO ARE NOT IN THE PORTAL are negotiating deals and being recruited by schools as well. They don't get recruited only after they enter the portal. The recruiting starts well before.
After this season just about the entire LSU team, and the players on every other team, will be looking to "renegotiate" their contract. So the coaches/GMs have to decide - do we want to resign this player? If so, what is the monetary value we have on him? Do we want to sign an outside FA? And how much do we want to spend on a "rookie"? (HS signee).
Think of it a bit in MLB terms. Teams have to decide - do we want to be the Dodgers or Yankees where we use our money advantage to sign proven FAs as opposed to building through he farm system? Or do we want to be more like a small market team where we sign less or unproven players for cheaper and try to development them? The one flaw in that thinking is unlike in the MLB, the developmental players aren't signing long term contracts. So just because you sign the 5* freshman this season there is no guarantee you have him locked up for more than just one season
After this season just about the entire LSU team, and the players on every other team, will be looking to "renegotiate" their contract. So the coaches/GMs have to decide - do we want to resign this player? If so, what is the monetary value we have on him? Do we want to sign an outside FA? And how much do we want to spend on a "rookie"? (HS signee).
Think of it a bit in MLB terms. Teams have to decide - do we want to be the Dodgers or Yankees where we use our money advantage to sign proven FAs as opposed to building through he farm system? Or do we want to be more like a small market team where we sign less or unproven players for cheaper and try to development them? The one flaw in that thinking is unlike in the MLB, the developmental players aren't signing long term contracts. So just because you sign the 5* freshman this season there is no guarantee you have him locked up for more than just one season
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:27 am to ELTIGRE55
It has its pros and cons. Hard working kids should get rewarded. Dumb kids making dumb decisions surrounded by dumb adults. Should be restricted to one transfer every 2 years. Too much roster turnover.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:57 am to ELTIGRE55
I don’t know about junk, but people drastically overrate the average quality of player available in the portal, especially at non-skill positions.
There a like 20 guys in a given cycle who really move the needle for a contender, and maybe another hundred replacement-level players, best I can tell.
You can count the OL difference makers in the portal on one hand.
There a like 20 guys in a given cycle who really move the needle for a contender, and maybe another hundred replacement-level players, best I can tell.
You can count the OL difference makers in the portal on one hand.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:25 pm to ELTIGRE55
Free agency call it what it is
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:31 pm to ELTIGRE55
quote:Few exceptions?
With a few exceptions
7 of the last 9 Heisman winners were transfers
Posted on 11/11/26 at 2:39 pm to lsupride87
I mean if the going rate for a good OL is 3-5 mil, you gonna drop $15-20 mil every season just to have a good OL?
None of this is sustainable. Even Gordon and MMR don't have unlimited funds.
None of this is sustainable. Even Gordon and MMR don't have unlimited funds.

Popular
Back to top
7









