- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Why the College Football Playoff system isn’t working"
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:32 pm to tigerbank24
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:32 pm to tigerbank24
Right? Look at Michigan's Schedule
Colorado State (2-9)
Hawaii (3-9)
UCONN (6-6)
Maryland (6-5)
Iowa (7-4)
Indiana (4-7)
Penn St (9-2)
MSU (5-6)
Rutgers (4-7)
Nebraska (3-8)
Illinois (7-4)
They've played 2 games against teams with winning records in the last 2 months. What a fricking joke
Colorado State (2-9)
Hawaii (3-9)
UCONN (6-6)
Maryland (6-5)
Iowa (7-4)
Indiana (4-7)
Penn St (9-2)
MSU (5-6)
Rutgers (4-7)
Nebraska (3-8)
Illinois (7-4)
They've played 2 games against teams with winning records in the last 2 months. What a fricking joke
0
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:46 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
the playoffs were created out of necessity when it was obvious that you REGULARLY have more than a measly two teams that had done enough over 13 weeks to have a case for title contention.
Yeah but there’s never more than 4 such teams. Certainly not 12.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:46 pm to Gountiss
What makes you an expert because you watch games. You are biased like the committee. 
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:50 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Alabama truly doesn't factor into the playoff decision this year at all
Just wait until Bama makes the playoffs. It’s not far fetched at all.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 2:56 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
then play UAB and USC doesn't pass them even though they crushed Colorado and then beat UCLA
It's relative. I guarantee you if LSU only beat UAB by two scores USC would have jumped us. We did what we should have done against UAB, they SKATED by UCLA. Those are even performances. USC did not outperform LSU last weekend.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 3:01 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
I mean, he’s not wrong. The rankings are all kinds of screwed up. Bring back the BCS.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 3:10 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
I mean, he’s not wrong. The rankings are all kinds of screwed up. Bring back the BCS.
All they’ve done is put themselves into a position to put LSU in if they win out without people losing their minds, which is exactly what should be done for a 1 or 2 loss SEC champ.
Imagine the outrage of LSU were 7 or 8, but won out and they jumped them 4 spots over USC in the final polls. It would be worse than the whining we’re getting now. Everyone knows deep down which team out of LSU and USC would have earned a spot if they were both to win out, and it’s not the team out west with no defense and a charmin soft schedule.
In a year where only a few 1 loss teams remain, the committee knows exactly what they’re doing with these rankings.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 5:46 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
I'm sorry, but beating BAMA holds way more weight than beating 8-2 UCLA
Posted on 11/23/22 at 6:24 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
If he wants to talk strength of schedule why doesn't he criticize Michigan?
If he wants to talk about how the teams have won why isn't he critical of OSU, Michigan and TCU who have struggled big time against weak teams?
This is why he shouldn't be taken seriously. He always says one side and never both. He is incapable of being completely honest. He just says facts about one-side which is the definition of being bias
If he wants to talk about how the teams have won why isn't he critical of OSU, Michigan and TCU who have struggled big time against weak teams?
This is why he shouldn't be taken seriously. He always says one side and never both. He is incapable of being completely honest. He just says facts about one-side which is the definition of being bias
Posted on 11/23/22 at 6:25 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
mean, he’s not wrong. The rankings are all kinds of screwed up. Bring back the BCS.
Go look at where the BCS has Alabama and LSU then slap yourself.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 6:37 pm to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
USC and maybe Clemson should be ahead of LSU.
Based on what? None of these team’s conferences has done shite in OOC for the most part.
Utah lost to UF for goodness sake. Oregon got blasted by UGA. Yes FSU beat LSU, but it was a 1 point win despite LSU shooting itself in the foot in almost historic fashion.
Best Pac12 win? Michigan State? Wisconsin?
For the ACC, the LSU win for FSU is their best win. Outside of that, what y’a got? Purdue?
Posted on 11/23/22 at 6:43 pm to Geauxgurt
FSU beating LSU is probably the single best OOC win. In fact it absolutely is.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 6:50 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
So he’s bringing in Utah, the same Utah that lost to Florida..okay.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 9:00 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Four teams has always been the right number. The solution is so easy: BCS formula, top 4 teams.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 4:19 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Joel Klitt
Posted on 11/24/22 at 5:08 am to POTUS2024
quote:
Four teams has always been the right number. The solution is so easy: BCS formula, top 4 teams.
If you believe the BCSKnowHow Twitter page, the playoff committee has selected the same 4 teams that the BCS would have every year since the playoff began.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News